Manuel Franzmann/Sascha Liebermann - BIEN-Conference, Berlin, October 6/7 2000:
Saving Citizenship from the workhouse.Upholding the obligation to work undermines the citizen’s autonomy.
- 2 -But let us step back and have a look at the current contradictions of the modern nation-statewhich promotes a revitalization of what, in this paper, we would like to call a “workhousementality”.Modern democratic nation-states seek to achieve fundamental aims of
from which derive others, such as
The community’s decision to provide goods andservices within a competitive market economy, and its decision to distribute income via paidwork with reference to individual achievement, both create a dynamic of rationalization, of large-scale production, and of wealth, which results in significant inequality with respect tothe individual’s opportunity to succeed in this system. As a result, communities dedicate aconsiderable part of their budgets (generated by taxing economic value) to balance out theseinequalities. Since 1945 the main political parties in Germany have agreed to employ federalfunds to such ends.
Generally speaking, economic booms before the 1970s generated full employment inindustrialized countries. In the mid-1970s, however, things changed:
such a period,unemployment
, and thereafter, unemployment
The term“structural unemployment” came into use to characterize such non-cyclical unemploymentwhich has been with us ever since. Today an ever
amount of human labor isnecessary to create an ever
amount of wealth.
Back of this development lies theintroduction of technology (such as an increased use of computers) which replaces humanlabor. It is not difficult to see that this tendency will not go away, and that the rationalization itrepresents will continue to accelerate within the next decades. Standardized work will becomedispensable as it is translated into routines — routines being what computers and machines
als der Staat sie von ihrer Seite zulaeßt: er gilt als alleinige Quelle des 'Rechts' auf Gewaltsamkeit.“ Weber,
Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft
(Tuebingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1972), p. 822.
It is an interesting historical fact that political systems which claimed to be democratic but decided for a non-capitalistic, planned economy, soon turned into repressive regimes. (Foremost among those nation-states are theso called “people’s republics”, i.e. communist countries.) It is also interesting that repressive regimes, whichmaintained a market economy for some time, later turned into democratic nation-states.
Terms such as “Sozialstaatsgebot” and “soziale Marktwirtschaft” indicate that in Germany there is a politicalconsensus in this respect.
Kommission fuer Zukunftsfragen der Freistaaten Bayern und Sachsen
, “Erwerbstaetigkeit undArbeitslosigkeit in Deutschland. Entwicklung, Ursachen und Maßnahmen.
Teil I: Entwicklung vonErwerbstaetigkeit und Arbeitslosigkeit in Deutschland und anderen fruehindustrialisierten Laendern.“
(Bonn1996); A. Bassanini, S. Scarpetta, I. Visco: “Knowledge, technology and economic growth: recent evidence fromOECD countries.” 150
Anniversary Conference of the National Bank of Belgium: "How to promote economicgrowth in the Euro area." Brussels, 11 and 12 May, 2000 (OECD Internet-pages).