Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1645337
Zoltan Pozsar, Tobias Adrian, Adam Ashcraft, and Hayley Boesky
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports
, no. 458July 2010JEL classification: G20, G28, G01
The rapid growth of the market-based financial system since the mid-1980s changed the natureof financial intermediation in the United States profoundly. Within the market-based financialsystem, “shadow banks” are particularly important institutions. Shadow banks are financialintermediaries that conduct maturity, credit, and liquidity transformation without access tocentral bank liquidity or public sector credit guarantees. Examples of shadow banks includefinance companies, asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) conduits, limited-purpose financecompanies, structured investment vehicles, credit hedge funds, money market mutual funds,securities lenders, and government-sponsored enterprises.Shadow banks are interconnected along a vertically integrated, long intermediation chain,which intermediates credit through a wide range of securitization and secured fundingtechniques such as ABCP, asset-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations, and repo.This intermediation chain binds shadow banks into a network, which is the shadow bankingsystem. The shadow banking system rivals the traditional banking system in the intermediationof credit to households and businesses. Over the past decade, the shadow banking system provided sources of inexpensive funding for credit by converting opaque, risky, long-termassets into money-like and seemingly riskless short-term liabilities. Maturity and credittransformation in the shadow banking system thus contributed significantly to asset bubbles inresidential and commercial real estate markets prior to the financial crisis.We document that the shadow banking system became severely strained during the financialcrisis because, like traditional banks, shadow banks conduct credit, maturity, and liquiditytransformation, but unlike traditional financial intermediaries, they lack access to publicsources of liquidity, such as the Federal Reserve’s discount window, or public sources of insurance, such as federal deposit insurance. The liquidity facilities of the Federal Reserve andother government agencies’ guarantee schemes were a direct response to the liquidity andcapital shortfalls of shadow banks and, effectively, provided either a backstop to creditintermediation by the shadow banking system or to traditional banks for the exposure toshadow banks. Our paper documents the institutional features of shadow banks, discusses their economic roles, and analyzes their relation to the traditional banking system.Key words: shadow banking, financial intermediation
Pozsar, Adrian, Ashcraft: Federal Reserve Bank of New York; Boesky, currently with Bank of AmericaMerrill Lynch, was with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York when this paper was written.Corresponding author: Zoltan Pozsar (email@example.com; phone: +1-917-602-0196). The viewsexpressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the FederalReserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System.