BEFORE THE CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISIONAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSIONIN THE MATTER OFAN APPLICATION BY CANADIAN NETWORK OPERATORS CONSORTIUM INC.(APPLICANT)PURSUANT TO PART I OF THE
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION ANDTELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
ANDSECTIONS 24, 25, 27, 32, 47 AND 55 OF THE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT
DIRECTED TOBELL ALIANT REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BELLCANADA, COGECO CABLE CANADA INC., MTS ALLSTREAM INC., ROGERSCOMMUNICATIONS PARTNERSHIP, SHAW CABLESYSTEMS GP AND VIDEOTRON LTD.(RESPONDENTS)TO PROVIDE EXPEDITED RELIEF WITH RESPECT TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
BILLING PRACTICES FOR WHOLESALE RESIDENTIAL HIGH-SPEED ACCESS SERVICES
,TELECOM REGULATORY POLICY 2011-703, 15 NOVEMBER 20114 JANUARY 2012
Table of ContentsPage
1.0
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ........................................................................1
1.1
The urgency and importance of implementing TRP 2011-703 correctly ................1
1.2
Order Sought ............................................................................................................2
1.3
Structure of balance of application ..........................................................................5
2.0 LEGAL BASIS FOR APPLICATION ................................................................................6
2.1
Section 24 of the
Act
................................................................................................6
2.2
Section 25 of the
Act
................................................................................................6
2.3
Section 27 of the
Act
................................................................................................7
2.4
Section 32 of the
Act
................................................................................................7
2.5
Section 47 of the
Act
................................................................................................8
2.5.1
Application of section 27 of the
Act
............................................................8
2.5.2
Application of the telecommunications policy objectives of the
Act
..........8
2.5.3
Application of the Policy Direction .............................................................9
2.6
Section 55 of the
Act
..............................................................................................10
3.0 THE IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES RAISED BY INCUMBENT TARIFF PAGES .....11
3.1
The Bell Companies ...............................................................................................11
3.1.1
Realm splitting is unnecessary and unduly disruptive and costly forindependent ISP end-users – a different approach is required andindependent ISPs must have the means to audit the separation of residential and business traffic ...................................................................11
3.1.2
Allocation of contracted capacity dynamically across multiple interfaces isessential to facilitate ISP network redundancy and load balancingrequirements ...............................................................................................14
3.1.3
Capacity ordering intervals must be short to accommodate the removal of traffic shaping and other changing market conditions ...............................16
3.1.4
Independent ISPs should not be charged for 155 Mbps of capacity onlegacy OC3 interfaces, when those interfaces can only support 130 Mbpsof IP traffic .................................................................................................17
3.2
MTSA ....................................................................................................................17
3.2.1
Allocation of contracted capacity dynamically across multiple interfaces isessential to facilitate independent ISP network redundancy and loadbalancing requirements ..............................................................................18
3.2.2
Capacity ordering intervals must be short to accommodate changingmarket conditions .......................................................................................20
3.2.3
Legacy and VDSL traffic should be carried on the same AHSSPIs ..........20
3.3
Cogeco, Rogers and Videotron ..............................................................................21
3.3.1
Allocation of contracted capacity dynamically across multiple interfaces isessential to facilitate independent ISP network redundancy and loadbalancing requirements ..............................................................................22
3.3.2
Capacity ordering intervals must be short to accommodate changingmarket conditions .......................................................................................24
3.4
Cogeco, Rogers, Shaw and Videotron ...................................................................24
- ii -
4.0
THE NEED FOR RAPID AND FAIR IMPLEMENTATION OF TRP 2011-703 ...........26
4.1
Implementation of TRP 2011-703 must be competition friendly and must not bedelayed ...................................................................................................................26
4.2
CNOC request for abridgement of filing dates associated with this Application ..27
4.3
CNOC request to have the terms and conditions of implementation of TRP 2011-703 made interim ...................................................................................................27
4.4
This Application does not prejudice CNOC’s right to respond to various tariff notices ....................................................................................................................27
5.0
CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................28
6.0 LIST OF PARTIES SERVED ...........................................................................................30
7.0 NOTICE .............................................................................................................................31
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
CNOC Application Re Implementation of TRP 2011-703
860
Reads
0
Readcasts
1
Embed Views
More From This User
Notes
Load more
