U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t
F o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f C a l i f o r n i a
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAORACLE AMERICA, INC.,Plaintiff,v.GOOGLE INC.,Defendant./ No. C 10-03561 WHA
OMNIBUS ORDER ONMOTIONS IN LIMINE FORPRETRIAL CONFERENCE
The pretrial conference in this action was heard on December 21, 2011. In advance of thatconference, plaintiff submitted five motions in limine and defendants submitted five.
Google’s motion in limine number one is
. Google seeks to exclude the Lindholmemail under FRE 403, assuming that its pending petition for writ of mandamus is eventuallydenied. In support, Google submits the declaration of the email’s author, Tim Lindholm, statingthat prior to writing the email, he never reviewed the patents or copyrights asserted by Oracle, henever reviewed any of the source code or implementation for the allegedly infringing aspects of Android, and he did not (and had no legal training necessary to) analyze whether
Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document676 Filed01/04/12 Page1 of 8