/  9
 
QUEENSBOULEVARD
A BOOK OF PRECEDENTS
 
INTRODUCTION
This booklet shows streets that are similar in size to Queens Boulevard, but have dierent uses in placeof trac lanes, including transit, space for pedestrians and cyclists, and parks. Use this booklet toexplore these other streets, as examples of how Queens Boulevard could be a safer place for all roadusers.For too long, New Yorkers have adapted to the dangerous condions of Queens Boulevard. Thoughonly 46 percent of New Yorkers own cars, Queens Boulevard is designed for fast travel by privatevehicles, to the detriment of others. The priorizaon of the car comes at a steep price – for the past15 years, ever since trac crash data was made public and mapped, Queens Boulevard topped the listof most dangerous streets every year.In Spring 2010, the Transportaon Alternaves (T.A.) Queens Volunteer Commiee with T.A.’s BicycleAdvocacy Director, Caroline Samponaro, embarked on a campaign to win pedestrian and cyclist safetyin Queens. T.A. is a New York City-based sustainable transportaon advocacy organizaon. Workingwith Planning Corps, a non-prot, volunteer network of urban planners, tools were developed to buildpublic support for changes to the street.One major insight from our analysis is there is enough space on Queens Boulevard to accommodate allthe communies’ needs. The only thing missing now is polical will.A project like this is a collecve eort. Thank you to the many people who aended Planning Corpsworking sessions over many months. In parcular, we would like to thank Mike Lydon of Street PlansCollaborave, Eric Galipo of H3 Hardy Collaboraon Architecture, and Anthony Denaro of OpenPlansfor working so diligently on this booklet.The dynamic Queens Volunteer Commiee movated the enre project, and we would be remiss notto menon David Dubovsky, the former commiee chair, and Jessame Hannus for their connuedengagement with Planning Corps.Finally, this whole collaboraon would not have been possible without the support of TransportaonAlternaves. Thank you Paul White and Caroline Samponaro.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
MULTIWAY BOULEVARD
 
200’150’25%LAND USE: URBAN, SUBURBANResidenal, Light Industry, RetailMEDIUM, LOW15’ SidewalksSparse Street Trees, Amenies1410’ - 11’ Trac Lane Width7.5’ Parking Lane WidthN/An/aBike RackBUS, SUBWAYBus Stops, SheltersSubway Staons/ViaductRight-of-Way WidthMotor Vehicle Space AllocaonPedestrian/Bicycle/Transit RaoLAND USE CHARACTERGENERAL USESPUBLIC FRONTAGE QUALITYOuter Sidewalk WidthLandscape Type# VEHICULAR, PARKING LANESTrac Lane WidthParking Lane WidthBIKEWAY TYPEMovementBicycle Parking
 
TRANSIT TYPEBus AccommodaonRail Accommodaon
Queens Boulevard features 14 vehicularlanes (including parking) and 5 dierentconguraons over its 6-mile trajectory.The Boulevard’s auto-centric design, mix-ture of suburban/urban forms, lack of treecoverage, and oversized intersecons dovery lile to enrich the quality of the pub-lic realm. Furthermore, access lanes areused as heavily as the thru-lanes, furtherdegrading the pedestrian experience.
QUEENSBOULEVARD
New York, NY; Urban Suburban.Residenal, Light Industrial, Retail
14
TRAFFICLANES
15’15’
SIDEWALKLANEWIDTHSNO MEDIAN AMENTITIESBUS STOPS W/ SHELTERSBIKE RACKSSPARSE STREET TREESAMENITIES
10’11’
TRAFFICLANEWIDTHSSUBWAYNO BUSLANESNO BIKELANES
7.5’
PARKINGLANEWIDTHS

Share & Embed

More from this user

Add a Comment

Characters: ...