Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Reasonable Wank Blog Post by Liz Hempel

Reasonable Wank Blog Post by Liz Hempel

Ratings: (0)|Views: 346 |Likes:
Published by Peter Tierney
Liz does something something
Liz does something something

More info:

Categories:Comics
Published by: Peter Tierney on Jan 10, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as ODT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/10/2013

pdf

text

original

 
ReasonableWank Monday, 9 January 2012The 'Life' of the SAVN
 The Stop the Australian Vaccination Network is a facebook hategroup, comprised of halfwit doctors, retired women's beauty mageditors and other trolling individuals and cyber bullies whootherwise have too much time on their hands. Their goal is not only to Stop the Australian Network, but tosuppress any civilised debate over the safety or effectiveness of vaccines or cracks in the Healthcare System. In the words of Daniel(the founder of the SAVN) "There is no debate. We are right andthey are wrong". Uh-okay...If you peruse the SAVN's FB wall, you will often see members of thegroup (admins included) referring to people who choose not tovaccinate as stupid, uneducated, uncivilised conspiracy theorists. Their posts are laced with spite and venom, which is why 'Stop theAustralian Vaccination Network - Don't question your doctor' cameto exist. We are here to take out the trash. The holier-than-thouadmin of the SAVN claim not to care, but we can see that they DO.Numerous ficticious abuse reports have been submitted to FBadmin (very few of them have been acted upon). Might I add thatsubmitting ficticious abuse reports is actually a violation of FB TOS.Abuse of this feature could in itself, lead to the person responsiblebeing suspended from Facebook (not that we pretend to care). The blogger who refers to himself as 'Reasonable Hank' (aka Peter Tierney) is particularly vendictive. He and a few of his lackeys havetaken it upon themselves to 'call out' the people they believe areresponsible for allegedly sending a series of nasty messages tomore outspoken members of the SAVN group.I personally have good reason to believe that these messages don'teven exist. Most are comprised of random screenshots with noname beside them that could have been written by anybody (even
 
possibly Peter Tierney himself).Reasonable Hank goes on to claim that the person who isresponsible for this alleged harassment must be Liz Hempel, herpartner and Joanne Bolland (at first he claimed it was her partner, tilLiz explained she wasn't even married).One has to wonder what basis he has for assuming that either of these people were responsible for these posts that he claims weresent from the profiles Othon Edmon and Charles Dickens.He also claims that Macbeth Lectar sent a message to Amy Ives, butwe're yet to see any proof of that. Screenshots of words with noidentity beside them. What does this prove? Where are the IPaddresses that Rhianna Miles claims have been traced? Weencourage you to produce them, Peter & Rhianna.Speaking of Rhianna, it seems she is in a little bit of hot water overa random phonecall that was received by the Hempel family inrelation to Sharon Hempel approximately two months ago.A member of the SAVN just happened to slip and mentionsomething of a 'Carmen Hempel' writing about Sharon on the AVNwall and stated that 'Sharon's sister in law' did not know thisperson, and therefore concluded that Liz Hempel was not who sheclaimed to be.Rhianna Miles was meanwhile also busy bragging (on the SAVN FBwall) about that same phonecall which actually did take place.Whilst Rhianna claimed to have no knowledge of contacting theHempel family, she left this very self-incriminating post (payparticular attention to the last one, more about the red arrow inbetween in a moment) :
 
 Take note of the words "Carmen Hempel who was APPARENTLYUNKNOWN TO THE HEMPEL FAMILY". Assuming this was true, howwould she know this? What gave a member of the SAVN the right tocontact an innocent family and quiz them? Sharon Hempel's familyhave already suffered enough because of five incompetent doctorsand a massive health cover up, the same flawed health systemwhich you have vehemently sworn to protect. Why would somestranger think it is okay to interrogate this family with questions inregard to Sharon Hempel?What's worse, is the SAVN actually applauds this kind of behaviour.Peter Tierney (Reasonable Hank) has not described it as'harassment', rather 'checking the identity of an internet troll' :Well firstly Peter. You are making alot of assumptions. Firstly you areassuming that the person that Rhianna claimed had mentionedSharon several months ago, was infact Liz Hempel. Rhianna claimsit was Carmel Hempel. Secondly, I would love to see some evidencethat this Carmel Hempel was indeed trolling, as this telephoneharassment took place over two months ago. Screenshots?ANYTHING?

Activity (4)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Maureen Chuck added this note
Ever heard of spellcheck?
Paul Jones liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->