Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword
Like this
11Activity
×
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
TAITZ v FUDDY (HI CIR CT) - Amended Ex Parte Motion Reciprocal Subpoena Enforcement

TAITZ v FUDDY (HI CIR CT) - Amended Ex Parte Motion Reciprocal Subpoena Enforcement

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,137|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan

More info:

categoriesTypes, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Jan 11, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less

04/22/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Dr.OrlyTaitz,
ESQ
29839
Santa
Margarita ste
100Rancho
Santa
Margarita
CA
92688
Ph
949-683
5411 fax949-766-7603Orlv-Ta;tz(agmail.com
rltll.rf
trlririi.
!i,0.Ylr
''"'itr''
., a\?
...r'!r'_.\i4.--
-
-c:
.
.1.
-('i;n
ctvtL
11-1-1731-08
HON, RHONDA
NISH
IMURA
PRESIDING
FITED
AUGUST 10,
2011
AGENCY APPEALDATE OF HEARING:CIRCUIT COURT
FOR
THE
FIRST
CIRCUIT
HONOLULU,
HAWAII
DR.
ORLY
TAITZ,
ESQ
PLAINTIFF
LOREIIA
FUDDY
IN
HER
OFFICIAL CAPACITY
AS
DIRECTOR
OF
THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
STATE
OF
HAWAII,
DR,
ALVIN
T.
ONAKA,
)
PETITION
FOR
A
WRIT
OF
MANDAMUS
)
REQUESTFOR
INSPECTIONOF
RECORDS
UNDER
UNIFIEDINFORMATION
PRACTICES ACT
)
STATUTE
92F,
STATE
OF
HAWAII
IN
HIS
OFFICIAL
CAPACITY
AS
THE
REGISTRAR,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
STATE
OF
HAWAII
lanuary
5
2012
gam
EX PARTE
AMENDED
)Motion
Reciprocal
Subpoena Enforcement
)
)
)
Request for
judicial
notice of
order
Denying
motion
to
dismiss
by
defendant
Obama
inballot
challenge
by
attorney
Taitz
COMES
NOw
Plaintiff
Dr.
Orly
Taitz,
ESQ.
("Taitz")
and
hereby
seeks
EX-PaneEmergency Rcciprocal
Subpoenaenforcement.
Under
Rule
7.2
F,
7.2-G3
of
therules
of
the
Circuit
courts
of
HI.
Plaintiff
files
this
emergency
ex
partemotion
(3)
EX
PARTEMOTIONS.
(A)
Cases
Assigned
to
d
Judge.
An
e.r
parre
molion
accompanied
by
a
proposedorder
shdl
be daled
and
stamped'lodged"
or
"received" by
the
Legal
DocumentsBranch./Section
clerk.
listedon
the
docket.
and
transmitted
to
the
assigned
judge.
Upon the
judge's
action
onlhe
motion,
;t
shnll be
transmitled
to
theLegal
DocumenlsBranch./Section
for
6ling,
ns
well
as
fbr
ihe
designation
of
r
hearing/retum
date and
time
plr[suant
to
slrbseclion
(gXlXA)(i)(b).
if
applicable.
(2)
be supported
by
an
aftjdavit
ordeclaration
stoting the
reason(s)
for filing
the
motion
e-r
parte.
the
effons
made
to
notify
pafties,
and,
if
the
motion
is to shonen
time
or advance
a
hearingpursuantto subseclion
(g)(5)
oi
rhisrule,
the
efforls
made
to
obtain
a sripulation
or
response
from
the
otherpanies
in
the
case
or
the
reason(s)
why
no
attempl
was
made;
(3)
be
accompanicd by
a
proposedorder; and
Emergency Exparte
motion
to
compel
compliance
with
subpoena
 
(4)
be
served
in
the
most
expeditious
manner available-
This
motion
is
supported
by an
attached
sworn
declaration
and
proposed
order.
Rule
7.2
G
5
Motion
to
shortentime
(5)MOTIO\
TO
SHOR1EN
TIME
FOR,
ADVANCE.
OR
IIESCHEDULE HEARINC.
(A)
A
motion to
sho(en
time
for
hearing
or
motion
to
adlance
hearing shall be
p.esen(ed
to
thejudge
assigned
the
case-
Upon
presentation,
the
motion
shall
be
dale stamped,
indicating
dare
of
receipt.
The
motion
shall
cire
the
authority
andstate
the
reason(s)and
factual or other
basis
for
the
request.
Thc
motion shall
be accompanied
b)
a
proposed
ordergrantingthe
motion
and
including
an
approprilte
space
for
thc datc
and
lime
of
the
hearing.
The
assigned
judgc
ma'
grant
or
deny
the motion,
and such
grant
or
denial shall
not
be
subj€ct
to
review
or
reconsid€ration.
If
granted,
the
date
and
time
for
the
hearing shall
be
indicutedon
the
order.
The motion
and
order
shall
be
transmitted
to
the
Legal
Documents Branch/Section
for
filing.
(B)
Requests
Io
reschedule hearings
shall be
made
by
motion
or
stipulation.Thestipulationshall
state
the
reason
lbr
reschedulinglhehearingand
shall
bepresented
for
approral
to
the
judge
assigned rhe
case
a( least.[8hours
belbre
the scheduled
hearin-q-
Upon
the
judge's
approval or denial
ol
the
stipulution.
it
shallbc
presented
tothe
Legal
Documents Branch-/Section
for
filiDg.(6)
COPIES
FOR
JUDCE.
(A)
Fi6t
Clr.r,it.A
pdrty
filing
a
molion,
response
to
a
motion, or
orher document
pertaining
to a
motion,
shall
deliver 2
file-stamped
copies
of
the
motioo.
responsc.
or
document
to
the
chambers
of
the
assigned
judge
on
the
filing
date.
Taitz
is
an attomey
for
Plaintiffs
in
case
Farrar.
Lax.
Judy.
Macleran.
Roth
vObama.
Brian
Kemo-Secretarv
of
State
of
GA
and Democrat
Partlof
GA
OSAH-
l2l5l36-60Malihi.
Subpoena
signed
by
Deputy
Chief
Administrativejudge
of
the
statc
of
GA
was
issued
ordering Director
of
Health
of
the
state
of
Hawaii,
LorettaFuddy,
(def'endant
in
this
case)
to
appearat
trial
andproducedocuments
requested,
as
well
as
appear
for
pretrial
deposition
and
inspection
of
documcnts.
Exiibits
l.
Subpoena
sought
under
rule
HAW
RCP
45(a)
and
HAW
RCP
45
(dxl),
HRS-624-24.5,
HRS
624-27
as
well
as
under
HRS 338.18t91.
EmergencyExparte
motion
to
compel compliance
with
subpoena
 
Due
to
the fact,
that
trial
is
set
of
January
26,2012
and
time is
of
the
essence,
Plaintilf
respectfirlly
asks
this
Honorable court
to
hear
this
emergency
motion
on
January
6,
2012
in
conjunction
with
the
scheduled
motion
in
this
case.
Additionally,
this
matter
is
integrally
related
to
the
scheduled
motion,
as
thesubpoena
at
hand
represents
grounds
to
grant
Motion
for
Reconsiderationunder
HRS
338-18(9).
Plaintiff
respectfully
requests
to
stay
final
ruling
on motion fbr
reconsiderationpendingdecision
on
this motion.
Underrule
7.2
G5this court
has
powerto
shorten thc
time
and
expedite
hearing.
Under rule 7.2 F
and7.2
G3
the
court
can hear
thismotion
ex-parte.
This motion
is
related
to
upcoming
trial
and
seeks
reciprocal
enforcement
of
a
subpoena
fbr
Def'endant
Director
of
Health Fuddy to
appear
at
trjal
and
tbr
pretrialdeposition
and
provide
lbr
inspection
original
birth
certificate
for
Barack
HusseinObama,
allegedly maintained
on
file.This
court
adviscd
the
Plaintiff
today,
that
it
scheduled
the
motion
fbr
reciprocal
subpoena
Enforcement
for
January 26,2012.
This
date
is
absolutely incompatible
with
the
case,
from which
subpoena
isissued,
as
the
trial
is scheduled
lbr
January
26,
same
dame.
PlaintitT
needs
to
depose
the
defendant,
fly
experts,
have
the
expertsready
with
their
reports
for trial
on January 26.
This is
a matter
of
national importance,
as
it
is
related
to
thc examination
of
the
original
birth
certificate
of
the
President
of
the
United
States
and
in light
of
the
Emergency Exparte
motion
to
compel
compliance
with
subpoena

Activity (11)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
funnyhaha71 liked this
Jack Ryan liked this
silverbull8 liked this
Jack Ryan liked this
funnyhaha71 liked this
funnyhaha71 liked this
silverbull8 liked this
funnyhaha71 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->