Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Let s understand
Institution of Jan Lokpal at central govt level Jan Lokayukta in each state Correspondingly Jan Lokpal to accept corruption complaints against Central govt dept and Jan Lokayukta against state govt dept Each will have 10 members and 1 chairperson
Let s understand
Will be completely Independent Politicians and bureaucrats will not able to interfere in their functioning Will get whatever financial resources they require and will be empowered to select and employ any number of employees from within the government or outside.
Confiscation of Assets
Each bureaucrat, politician and judge to submit their statement of moveable and immoveable assets every year This will be declared publicly, on the official website
Confiscation of Assets
If an asset is found to be owned by a public servant later and undeclared, it will be deemed to be obtained through corruption After each election, assets declared by each candidate to be verified If undeclared assets are found, a case will be registered
How to ensure that there is no corruption within Jan Lokpal or Jan Lokayukta?
Selection Committee selects 5 members from retired Chief Election Commissioners and retired CAGs. These 5 members will select another 5 members from civil society to make the 10-member Search Committee.
Selection committee will choose from this list, by consensus All the meetings of the Search Committee and Selection Committee shall be video recorded and will be made public. Jan Lokpal and Jan Lokayukta will select & appoint its own officers and staff
3. By ensuring that Jan Lokpal and Jan Lokayukt are not influenced!
The Chairperson and members of Lokpal and Lokayukta will not be eligible for appointment to any position in the govt or for contesting elections after they leave office.
Comparison
CURRENT SYSTEM
PROPOSED JAN LOKPAL-JAN LOKAYUKTA SYSTEM Under Jan Lokpal Bill, the full bench of Lokpal will give permission to file a case against any judge. No permission will be required from Chief Justice of India. Therefore, corruption in higher judiciary will also be checked through Jan Lokpal Bill.
No FIR can be registered against any Supreme Court or High Court judge without the permission of Chief Justice of India. It has been seen in the past that the Chief Justice of India tries to protect his own fraternity of judges and rarely gives such a permission.
JUDGES SC & HC
Comparison
CURRENT SYSTEM
PROPOSED JAN LOKPAL-JAN LOKAYUKTA SYSTEM
PUNISHMENT
The quantum of punishment for people convicted of corruption ranges from: 6 months to 7 years of imprisonment which is inadequate!
The punishment will range from: 1 year rigorous imprisonment to life sentence. Higher punishment for those in higher rank.
Comparison
CURRENT SYSTEM
PROPOSED JAN LOKPAL-JAN LOKAYUKTA SYSTEM
In the current system, if anyone obtains any benefit from the government illegally, it is difficult to prove that the person did so by paying bribes
If a person obtains any benefit from the government in violation of a law or rules and regulations, that person along with concerned public servants shall be deemed to have indulged in corrupt practices.
EVIDENCE
Comparison
CURRENT SYSTEM
PROPOSED JAN LOKPAL-JAN LOKAYUKTA SYSTEM Jan Lokpal and Jan Lokayukta will be responsible for providing the whistleblowers, whether inside or outside the government, protection from: - Professional threat or victimisation - Physical threat or victimisation
Whistleblowers
Currently, people who report corrupt practices or raise their voice against corruption are being threatened, victimized and even murdered. There is no protection for them.
Comparison
CURRENT SYSTEM
PROPOSED JAN LOKPAL-JAN LOKAYUKTA SYSTEM At central govt level, anti-corruption Presently there are branch of CBI, CVC and all internal multiple anti-corruption vigilance wings of all dept should be merged into Jan Lokpal. agencies like: At state level, anti-corruption CBI, CVC, ACB, state branch of state police, the state vigilance department vigilance department, internal vigilance wings of all departments All these are controlled and existing Lokayuktas in states by corrupt officials and should be merged into Jan Lokayukta of that state. politicians and are This will do away with multiplicity ineffective. of anti-corruption agencies.
People s Grievances will overburden them . Lokpal should only investigate a few high profile cases of corruption! ..Lokpal should not be given the responsibility of protecting the whistleblowers! CBI, CVC and departmental vigilance should not be merged into Lokpal Let Lokpal be a small body and let the existing anti-corruption bodies keep functioning in ineffective manner as they are