Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Bouvier's Common Law Dictionary

Bouvier's Common Law Dictionary

Ratings:

4.83

(1)
|Views: 1,558|Likes:
Published by LakeshoreBaby
Bouvier's Law is an American Common Law dictionary. I am not sure if there is an earlier version than this.

What is interesting is that this version came out the same year as the famous Dred-Scott case, where it was stated that the terms "people" and the State "citizen" were equivalent (the artificial Sovereignty of the Monarchy having been transferred from the King of England to "The People" together after the American Revolutionary War. The people of the individual Republic's share a sovereignty together. To me, the Dred-Scott case confirms what was never really defined in the Constitution, that the State Citizen is indeed one of "the people", and that Citizens, as natural persons of a group, are indeed sovereign, and subject to the law, all at the same time.

Also interesting is that the next (I believe) version came out in 1914, around the time of the Federal Reserve Act. Yet another version in 1934 right after Executive Order 6102 and House Joint Resolution 192 were passed (the removal of Gold/money from circulation).

The latter stages of Bouvier and it's editions seems to me to signify how the operational law on the land changed over time. The original Constitutional legislated Common Law of the Land was replaced with corporate law after the civil war (North's war of aggression after South Carolina left the union) when the federal corporation UNITED STATES was created in Washington DC by the federal government. At this point common law of the states was replaced with civil law originating out of the new created corporate "state" government in Washington DC, contracting over the original state Republics with corporate versions of the Republics, incorporated into Washington DC as the head state. This civil law mimicked more or less the common law of the original republics of these united States of America, but was corporate and acted upon artificial all caps NAME persons, not the natural persons of the Republics. It was at this point after the civil war that the federation called "these" united States of America, now controlled by the federal government, began to be called "the" UNITED STATES. In 1913 the Federal Reserve Act was fraudulently passed within the UNITED STATES, and then in 1933 admiralty maritime law took over the incorporated federal corporation UNITED STATES of Washington DC when gold was removed from circulation.

So we can see layer upon layer of fraud. First the federal government creating the UNITED STATES corporate government in Washington DC and taking control of the Republics after the civil war. Then the fraudulent UNITED STATES government itself being taken over by international bankers in 1913, with full control taken in 1933.

The most interesting part of this dictionary I have found so far is the assertion that courts of record can be denied jurisdiction with express negative words, which I assume to be a negative averment. This only makes sense, given that men and women can be natural persons as a part of a jural society only by their consent [Chisholm v. Georgia]... a natural person's subjection to Constitutional written law being of the Republics. And to corporate law through the artificial person NAME a hallmark of the post 1933 admiralty law of the corporate UNITED STATES.

True Sovereignty must be found in the man [Chisholm v. Georgia], this being the class of lawmaker, and not themselves subject to legislation. From this I surmise that the natural person of the Republic is subject to the constitutional bonded statutes of the common law of We The People. And then the artificial person of the UNITED STATES, the all caps name we use in commerce, is a commercial entity slave of the federal government in Washington DC.
Bouvier's Law is an American Common Law dictionary. I am not sure if there is an earlier version than this.

What is interesting is that this version came out the same year as the famous Dred-Scott case, where it was stated that the terms "people" and the State "citizen" were equivalent (the artificial Sovereignty of the Monarchy having been transferred from the King of England to "The People" together after the American Revolutionary War. The people of the individual Republic's share a sovereignty together. To me, the Dred-Scott case confirms what was never really defined in the Constitution, that the State Citizen is indeed one of "the people", and that Citizens, as natural persons of a group, are indeed sovereign, and subject to the law, all at the same time.

Also interesting is that the next (I believe) version came out in 1914, around the time of the Federal Reserve Act. Yet another version in 1934 right after Executive Order 6102 and House Joint Resolution 192 were passed (the removal of Gold/money from circulation).

The latter stages of Bouvier and it's editions seems to me to signify how the operational law on the land changed over time. The original Constitutional legislated Common Law of the Land was replaced with corporate law after the civil war (North's war of aggression after South Carolina left the union) when the federal corporation UNITED STATES was created in Washington DC by the federal government. At this point common law of the states was replaced with civil law originating out of the new created corporate "state" government in Washington DC, contracting over the original state Republics with corporate versions of the Republics, incorporated into Washington DC as the head state. This civil law mimicked more or less the common law of the original republics of these united States of America, but was corporate and acted upon artificial all caps NAME persons, not the natural persons of the Republics. It was at this point after the civil war that the federation called "these" united States of America, now controlled by the federal government, began to be called "the" UNITED STATES. In 1913 the Federal Reserve Act was fraudulently passed within the UNITED STATES, and then in 1933 admiralty maritime law took over the incorporated federal corporation UNITED STATES of Washington DC when gold was removed from circulation.

So we can see layer upon layer of fraud. First the federal government creating the UNITED STATES corporate government in Washington DC and taking control of the Republics after the civil war. Then the fraudulent UNITED STATES government itself being taken over by international bankers in 1913, with full control taken in 1933.

The most interesting part of this dictionary I have found so far is the assertion that courts of record can be denied jurisdiction with express negative words, which I assume to be a negative averment. This only makes sense, given that men and women can be natural persons as a part of a jural society only by their consent [Chisholm v. Georgia]... a natural person's subjection to Constitutional written law being of the Republics. And to corporate law through the artificial person NAME a hallmark of the post 1933 admiralty law of the corporate UNITED STATES.

True Sovereignty must be found in the man [Chisholm v. Georgia], this being the class of lawmaker, and not themselves subject to legislation. From this I surmise that the natural person of the Republic is subject to the constitutional bonded statutes of the common law of We The People. And then the artificial person of the UNITED STATES, the all caps name we use in commerce, is a commercial entity slave of the federal government in Washington DC.

More info:

Published by: LakeshoreBaby on Nov 08, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/26/2015

pdf

text

original

 
Bouvier Law Dictionary A LAW DICTIONARY ADAPTED TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND OF THE SEVERAL STATES OF THE AMERICAN UNION With References to the Civil and Other Systems of Foreign Law by John Bouvier Ignoratis terminis ignoratur et ars. - Co. Litt. 2 a. Je sais que chaque science et chaque art a ses termes propres, inconnu au commun des hommes. - Fleury SIXTH EDITION, REVISED, IMPROVED, AND GREATLY ENLARGED. VOL. I. --------------------------- PHILADELPHIA CHILDS & PETERSON, 124 ARCH STREET 1856Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight hundredand thirty-nine, BY JOHN BOUVIER, In the Clerk's Office of the District9Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. -----------------------------Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight hundredand forty-three, BY JOHN BOUVIER, In the Clerk's Office of the DistrictCourt for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. -----------------------------Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight hundredand forty-eight, BY JOHN BOUVIER, In the Clerk's Office of the DistrictCourt for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. -----------------------------Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight hundredand fifty-two, BY ELIZA BOUVIER and ROBERT E. PETERSON, Trustees, In theClerk's Office of the District Court for the Eastern District ofPennsylvania. Deacon & Peterson, Printers 66 South Third Street. TO THE HONORABLE JOSEPH STORY, L L.D., One of the Judges of the Supreme Court of the United States THIS WORK is WITH HIS PERMISSION MOST RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED AS A TOKEN OF GREAT REGARD ENTERTAINED FOR HIS TALENTS, LEARNING, AND CHARACTER, BY THE AUTHOR. ADVERTISEMENT TO THE THIRD EDITION Encouraged by the success of this work, the author has endeavored torender this edition as perfect as it was possible for him to make it. Hehas remoulded very many of the articles contained in the former editions,and added upwards of twelve hundred new ones. To render the work as useful as possible, he has added a very copiousindex to the whole, which, at the same time that it will assist theinquirer, will exhibit the great number of subjects treated in thesevolumes.Page 1
 
Bouvier Law Dictionary As Kelham's Law Dictionary has been published in this city, and can behad by those who desire to possess it, that work has not been added as anappendix to this edition. Philadelphia, November, 1848. ADVERTISEMENT TO THE FOURTH EDITION Since the publication of the last edition of this work, its author,sincerely devoted to the advancement of his profession, has given to theworld his Institutes of American Law, in 4 vols. Svo. Always endeavoring torender his Dictionary as perfect as possible, he was constantly revising it;and whenever he met with an article which he had omitted, he immediatelyprepared it for a new edition. After the completion of his Institutes, inSeptember last, laboring to severely, he fell a victim to his zeal, and diedon the 18th of November, 1851, at the age of sixty-four. In preparing this edition, not only has the matter left by its authorbeen made use of, but additional matter has been added, so that the presentwill contain nearly one-third more than the last edition. Under one head,that of Maxims, nearly thirteen hundred new articles have been added. Thebook has been carefully examined, a great portion of it by two members ofthe bar, in order that it might be purged, as far as possible, from allerrors of every description. The various changes in the constitutions of thestates made since the last edition, have been noticed, so far as wascompatible with this work; and every effort made to render it as perfect asa work of the kind would permit, in order that it might still sustain thereputation given to it by a Dublin barrister, "of being a work of a mostelaborate character, as compared with English works of a similar nature, andone which should be in every library." That it may still continue to receive the approbation of the Bench andBar of the United States, is the sincere desire of the widow and daughter ofits author. PREFACETo the difficulties which the author experienced on his admission to thebar, the present publication is to be attributed. His endeavours to getforward in his profession were constantly obstructed, and his efforts for along time frustrated, for want of that knowledge which his elder brethren ofthe bar seemed to possess. To find among the reports and the varioustreatises on the law the object of his inquiry, was a difficult task; he wasin a labyrinth without a guide: and much of the time which was spent infinding his way out, might, with the friendly assistance of one who wasacquainted with the construction of the edifice, have been saved, and moreprofitably employed. He applied to law dictionaries and digests within hisreach, in the hope of being directed to the source whence they derived theirlearning, but be was too often disappointed; they seldom pointed out theauthorities where the object of his inquiry might be found. It is true suchworks contain a great mass of information, but from the manner in which theyhave been compiled, they sometimes embarrassed him more than if he had notconsulted them. They were written for another country, possessing lawsdifferent from our own, and it became a question how far they were or werenot applicable here. Besides, most of the matter in the English lawdictionaries will be found to have been written while the feudal law was inits full vigor, and not fitted to the present times, nor calculated forpresent use, even in England. And there is a great portion which, thoughuseful to an [vii] English lawyer, is almost useless to the Americanstudent. What, for example, have we to do with those laws of Great Britainwhich relate to the person of their king, their nobility, their clergy,their navy, their army; with their game laws; their local statutes, such asregulate their banks, their canals, their exchequer, their marriages, theirPage 2
 
Bouvier Law Dictionarybirths, their burials, their beer and ale houses, and a variety of similarsubjects? The most modern law dictionaries are compilations from the moreancient, with some modifications and alterations and, in many instances,they are servile copies, without the slightest alteration. In the mean timethe law has undergone a great change. Formerly the principal object of thelaw seemed to be to regulate real property, in all its various artificialmodifications, while little or no attention was bestowed upon the ruleswhich govern personal property and rights. The mercantile law has sincearisen, like a bright pyramid, amid the gloom of the feudal law, and is nowfar more important in practice, than that which refers to real estate. Thelaw of real property, too, has changed, particularly in this country. The English law dictionaries would be very unsatisfactory guides, evenin pointing out where the laws relating to the acquisition and transfer ofreal estate, or the laws of descent in the United States, are to be found.And the student who seeks to find in the Dictionaries of Cowel, Manly,Jacobs, Tomlins, Cunningham, Burn, Montefiore, Pott, Whishaw, Williams, theTermes de Ley, or any similar compilation, any satisfactory account inrelation to international law, to trade and commerce, to maritime law, tomedical jurisprudence, or to natural law, will probably not be fullygratified. He cannot, of course, expect to find in them anything inrelation to our government, our constitutions, or our political or civilinstitutions.[viii] It occurred to the author that a law dictionary, written entirelyanew, and calculated to remedy those defects, would be useful to theprofession. Probably overrating his strength, he resolved to undertake thetask, and if he should not fully succeed, he will have the consolation toknow, that his effort may induce some more gifted individual, and betterqualified by his learning, to undertake such a task, and to render theAmerican bar an important service. Upon an examination of the constitutionand laws of the United States, and of the several states of the AmericanUnion, he perceived many technical expressions and much valuable informationwhich he would be able to incorporate in his work. Many of these laws,although local in their nature, will be found useful to every lawyer,particularly those engaged in mercantile practice. As instances of such lawsthe reader is referred to the articles Acknowledgment, Descent, Divorce,Letters of Administration, and Limitatio. It is within the plan of thiswork to explain such technical expressions as relate to the legislative,executive, or judicial departments of the government; the political and thecivil rights and duties of the citizens; the rights and duties of persons,particularly such as are peculiar to our institutions, as, the rights ofdescent and administration; of the mode of acquiring and transferringproperty; to the criminal law, and its administration. It has also been anobject with the author to embody in his work such decisions of the courts asappeared to him to be important, either because they differed from formerjudgments, or because they related to some point which was before eitherobscure or unsettled. He does not profess to have examined or even referredto all the American cases; it is a part of the plan, however, to refer toauthorities, generally, which will lead the student to nearly all the cases. The author was induced to believe, that an occasional comparison of thecivil, canon, and other systems of foreign law, with our own,[ix] would beuseful to the profession, and illustrate many articles which, without suchaid, would not appear very clear; and also to introduce many terms fromforeign laws, which may supply a deficiency in ours. The articlesCondonation, Extradition, and Novation, are of this sort. He was induced toadopt this course because the civil law has been considered, perhaps notwithout justice, the best system of written reason, and as all laws are orought to be founded in reason, it seemed peculiarly proper to have recourseto this fountain of wisdom: but another motive influenced this decision; oneof the states of the Union derives most of its civil regulations from thecivil law; and there seemed a peculiar propriety, therefore, in introducingit into an American law dictionary. He also had the example of a Story, aKent, Mr. Angell, and others, who have ornamented their works from the samePage 3