2this morning, Beshara posted more than 25 additional Facebook messages, which variouslycriticized the government, celebrated NinjaVideo.net’s copyright infrignement, and sought toassemble a public relations team to engage media and documentary filmmakers to help her “fight back” and “change[ ] history . . . again.”
See
Exhibit 1. Beshara also posted several entries onwhat remains of the NinjaVideo.net forum boards, now hosted at www.ninjavideoforum.net,one
of which belittled the sentence imposed by the Court and mocked the named victim of her crimes.
See
Exhibit 2 (visited Jan. 9, 2012).Beshara’s post-sentencing actions demonstrate a clear lack of remorse over her illegalconduct and a disregard of the harm her actions have caused, and pose a danger to thecommunity. Courts regularly note such a lack of remorse in ordering post-conviction detention.
See
,
e.g.
,
United States v. Nicolo
, 706 F.Supp.2d 330, 335-36 (W.D.N.Y. 2010) (“Nicolo’srefusal to accept any responsibility for his actions, and his utter lack of remorse for his crimes, or for the harm and suffering that he has inflicted upon others, reinforces this conclusion” thatdetention pending appeal was appropriate);
United States v. Jinwright
, No. 3:09-cr-67, 2010 WL2926084 (W.D.N.C. July 23, 2010) (“economic danger” to community justified post-convictiondetention where court believed defendant may “continue[] to participate in possibly fraudulentschemes”);
United States v. Norman,
No. 08-tp-80004-Cr., 2009 WL 464078, *3 (S.D.Fla. Feb.24, 2009) (commenting on “Defendant’s fundamental lack of respect for the rule of law,” andfinding he “pose[d] a threat of economic danger to the community”);
United States v. Malquist,
619 F.Supp. 875, 878 (D.Mont.1985) (non-violent tax protester detained pending appeal basedon militant lack of responsibility). In addition, in Facebook posts made in response to commentson her NinjaVideo.net forum entry entitled “My, ‘I AM GOING TO PRISON’ Post”, Besharasuggests she may engage in physical violence with her future fellow inmates.
See
Ex. 3 at 2
Case 1:11-cr-00447-AJT Document 101 Filed 01/09/12 Page 2 of 4 PageID# 666