Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Genetic Testing - Breast Cancer, Huntington's Disease, and Bioethics

Genetic Testing - Breast Cancer, Huntington's Disease, and Bioethics

Ratings: (0)|Views: 10 |Likes:
Published by leduxx
Learn How to Live With Huntington's Disease

Learn How to Live With Huntington's Disease

More info:

Categories:Types, Research
Published by: leduxx on Jan 14, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





 ==== ====Learn How to Live With Huntington's Diseasehttp://amzn.to/yi8Cti ==== ====For genetic analysis related to breast cancer and Huntington's disease, it is likely suchinvestigations are initiated for an asymptomatic patient with a relevant family history. Testing forDown's syndrome is routine for pregnant women older than 35. With the advent of maternal serummarkers, aggressive obstetricians may recommend such screening to all their patients. The right to privacy - closely related to the bioethical principle of autonomy - is the main concern ingenetic testing. With whom are the results to be shared? With testing for BRCA mutations, amother or a daughter may learn she carries BRCA1 or BRCA2. Knowledge of this result might bevaluable to the daughter or mother, respectively. But the mother, for example, may wish to keepthe results private. She doesn't want her husband to know and fears her daughter may share thenews not only with family but also with friends. In some cases the mother and daughter share a family physician. Is that doctor obligated tocommunicate critical information to the daughter, even though such action will violate the mother'sright to privacy? The principles of autonomy and beneficence are in conflict in such a scenario.Does the mother have an obligation to communicate the information to her daughter? Herpersonal autonomy is at odds with her moral obligation to care for her children. Similarly a parent, whose own mother had Huntington's disease, chooses to be tested when he is40 years old. He learns he has an excessive number of CAG repeats in the HTT gene on the shortarm of chromosome 4. He will certainly develop Huntington's disease. Is he obligated to tell hischildren? Is his physician obligated to share the information? Again, the relevant bioethicalprinciples are in conflict. A mother-to-be wishes to learn as much as she can regarding the potential health of her baby-to-be. Her fetus carries an HTT anomaly suggestive of Huntington's disease onset after age 40. Shehas herself tested and learns she does not carry the gene. As a result of this process, she hasgained private medical information concerning her partner. He will develop Huntington's disease.Is she obligated to share this information? There are implications for his parents and his childrenfrom a previous marriage. Also, should she abort the fetus? If she chooses to have this child, is she imposing an unfairburden on society? Who will bear the costs of care for her child after the disease manifests? Mightthese resources have better uses elsewhere? Bioethical principles of justice and autonomy are inconflict. Would she be acting irresponsibly if she chooses to have additional children with her partner?Each child would have a 50% chance of developing Huntington's disease. Such actions would beethical, as decades of healthy existence would be preferable to never having been born at all.1

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->