Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • in Search of Linguistics of Silence: Caryapada

    Uploaded by

    Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay
    369 views5 pages
    2012. “In Search of Linguistics of Silence : Caryapada চর্যা-চর্চায় নীরবতার ভাষাতত্ত্ব সন্ধান : উপক্রমনিকা ” Pranab K. Chakroborty ed. Interaction VIII. (২৬-৩১ পাতা) Nabadwip. he author of this paper did not bother about the (a)formal linguistic analysis (meta-speaking on speaking, i.e. formal linguistics and philology) of the text of Caryapada (approx. 9th C A.D. A Tantric Buddhist text written in a sandhyabhasa or anti-language a la Halliday); (b) retrospective (pratyabhijna) construction of genealogical fantasy or linguistic statist identity or imagiNATION, instead he was proposing a secret guide to exquisite kayasadhana (the praxis within the body within the ambit of corporal studies)by following the path of Bhartrihari and Abhinavagupta’s post-formal non-analysis. The author followed Munidatta’s Sanskrit commentary of the Caryapada-text (written in an anti-language to hide the secrets of physiological (not in the Western medical sense of the term) points that is shaped and perceived by the world views of the so-called lower caste Tantric Buddhists)and that was commented in Sanskrit by Munidutta. This reciprocal discourse-exchange bi-way traffic) in between so-called H(igh)and L(ow) was also being observed by the author. The paper ironically started with the salutation to the contemporary interpreters of the said text, though the author said that they are missing the world-views of the Tantric Buddhists as the contemporary scholar-interpreters did not link the perceptions of Tantric kayasadhana that is meant for ‘care of self’ (epimelia heatue). Only Shashibhusan Dasgupta (1969) discovered the secrets of the kaya(corporeal). Thus, the scholarship was condemned by the Caryapada-composers, who were considered to be ‘illiterate’ according the norms of literacy. Dasgupta(ibid) thus described the “illiterates’”(?) aversion to the recondite scholarship. After that the author elaborated the rhetoric-terms (utpreksa/metaphor, comparison in general, vyaja/ having only appearance of, deceitful, false, simulated..) used by Munidutta to explain the surplus meanings of the texts. Even the author supplied the architectural details of Kakhar (female-shaped shrines) temples (Orissa) to explain the boat-utpreksa as used in Caryapada. Lastly, the author had linked the cakras (so-called Hindu and Buddhist systems were amalgamated here—a case of syncretism) with different stages of speeches/non-speeches (a trajectory from parole to silenceme) and sleeping/non-sleeping to reach the point of “vakpathatia” (cf. caryapada, 37 a cordoned zone of silenceme or paravak) in a tabular form with illustration. One point must be noted: the authors selfhood as a scientist was condemned here by the author himself as he criticized (a) the recent neuro-physicists’ anatomo-bio-political intervention into in body of the sadhakas/ practitioners; (b) the gap between theory and praxis as it was found in recondite scholarship. Thus the paper was an addition to the author’s agenda of introducing two novel disciplinary technologies: Silence and Corporal studies.

    Original Title

    চর্যা-চর্চায় নীরবতার ভাষাতত্ত্ব সন্ধান In Search of Linguistics of Silence : Caryapada

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    2012. “In Search of Linguistics of Silence : Caryapada চর্যা-চর্চায় নীরবতার ভাষাতত্ত্ব সন্ধান : উপক্রমনিকা ” Pranab K. Chakroborty ed. Interaction VIII. (২৬-৩১ পাতা) Nabadwip. he author of this paper did not bother about the (a)formal linguistic analysis (meta-speaking on speaking, i.e. formal linguistics and philology) of the text of Caryapada (approx. 9th C A.D. A Tantric Buddhist text written in a sandhyabhasa or anti-language a la Halliday); (b) retrospective (pratyabhijna) construction of genealogical fantasy or linguistic statist identity or imagiNATION, instead he was proposing a secret guide to exquisite kayasadhana (the praxis within the body within the ambit of corporal studies)by following the path of Bhartrihari and Abhinavagupta’s post-formal non-analysis. The author followed Munidatta’s Sanskrit commentary of the Caryapada-text (written in an anti-language to hide the secrets of physiological (not in the Western medical sense of the term) points that is shaped and perceived by the world views of the so-called lower caste Tantric Buddhists)and that was commented in Sanskrit by Munidutta. This reciprocal discourse-exchange bi-way traffic) in between so-called H(igh)and L(ow) was also being observed by the author. The paper ironically started with the salutation to the contemporary interpreters of the said text, though the author said that they are missing the world-views of the Tantric Buddhists as the contemporary scholar-interpreters did not link the perceptions of Tantric kayasadhana that is meant for ‘care of self’ (epimelia heatue). Only Shashibhusan Dasgupta (1969) discovered the secrets of the kaya(corporeal). Thus, the scholarship was condemned by the Caryapada-composers, who were considered to be ‘illiterate’ according the norms of literacy. Dasgupta(ibid) thus described the “illiterates’”(?) aversion to the recondite scholarship. After that the author elaborated the rhetoric-terms (utpreksa/metaphor, comparison in general, vyaja/ having only appearance of, deceitful, false, simulated..) used by Munidutta to explain the surplus meanings of the texts. Even the author supplied the architectural details of Kakhar (female-shaped shrines) temples (Orissa) to explain the boat-utpreksa as used in Caryapada. Lastly, the author had linked the cakras (so-called Hindu and Buddhist systems were amalgamated here—a case of syncretism) with different stages of speeches/non-speeches (a trajectory from parole to silenceme) and sleeping/non-sleeping to reach the point of “vakpathatia” (cf. caryapada, 37 a cordoned zone of silenceme or paravak) in a tabular form with illustration. One point must be noted: the authors selfhood as a scientist was condemned here by the author himself as he criticized (a) the recent neuro-physicists’ anatomo-bio-political intervention into in body of the sadhakas/ practitioners; (b) the gap between theory and praxis as it was found in recondite scholarship. Thus the paper was an addition to the author’s agenda of introducing two novel disciplinary technologies: Silence and Corporal studies.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Flag for inappropriate content
    369 views5 pages

    in Search of Linguistics of Silence: Caryapada

    Uploaded by

    Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay
    2012. “In Search of Linguistics of Silence : Caryapada চর্যা-চর্চায় নীরবতার ভাষাতত্ত্ব সন্ধান : উপক্রমনিকা ” Pranab K. Chakroborty ed. Interaction VIII. (২৬-৩১ পাতা) Nabadwip. he author of this paper did not bother about the (a)formal linguistic analysis (meta-speaking on speaking, i.e. formal linguistics and philology) of the text of Caryapada (approx. 9th C A.D. A Tantric Buddhist text written in a sandhyabhasa or anti-language a la Halliday); (b) retrospective (pratyabhijna) construction of genealogical fantasy or linguistic statist identity or imagiNATION, instead he was proposing a secret guide to exquisite kayasadhana (the praxis within the body within the ambit of corporal studies)by following the path of Bhartrihari and Abhinavagupta’s post-formal non-analysis. The author followed Munidatta’s Sanskrit commentary of the Caryapada-text (written in an anti-language to hide the secrets of physiological (not in the Western medical sense of the term) points that is shaped and perceived by the world views of the so-called lower caste Tantric Buddhists)and that was commented in Sanskrit by Munidutta. This reciprocal discourse-exchange bi-way traffic) in between so-called H(igh)and L(ow) was also being observed by the author. The paper ironically started with the salutation to the contemporary interpreters of the said text, though the author said that they are missing the world-views of the Tantric Buddhists as the contemporary scholar-interpreters did not link the perceptions of Tantric kayasadhana that is meant for ‘care of self’ (epimelia heatue). Only Shashibhusan Dasgupta (1969) discovered the secrets of the kaya(corporeal). Thus, the scholarship was condemned by the Caryapada-composers, who were considered to be ‘illiterate’ according the norms of literacy. Dasgupta(ibid) thus described the “illiterates’”(?) aversion to the recondite scholarship. After that the author elaborated the rhetoric-terms (utpreksa/metaphor, comparison in general, vyaja/ having only appearance of, deceitful, false, simulated..) used by Munidutta to explain the surplus meanings of the texts. Even the author supplied the architectural details of Kakhar (female-shaped shrines) temples (Orissa) to explain the boat-utpreksa as used in Caryapada. Lastly, the author had linked the cakras (so-called Hindu and Buddhist systems were amalgamated here—a case of syncretism) with different stages of speeches/non-speeches (a trajectory from parole to silenceme) and sleeping/non-sleeping to reach the point of “vakpathatia” (cf. caryapada, 37 a cordoned zone of silenceme or paravak) in a tabular form with illustration. One point must be noted: the authors selfhood as a scientist was condemned here by the author himself as he criticized (a) the recent neuro-physicists’ anatomo-bio-political intervention into in body of the sadhakas/ practitioners; (b) the gap between theory and praxis as it was found in recondite scholarship. Thus the paper was an addition to the author’s agenda of introducing two novel disciplinary technologies: Silence and Corporal studies.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 5
    eS a om Pea, RENCE, Ha ARw Bere Gee Ses he RAE siete oe Bars aiaarc, Sleers 1G Aa alta awe H ater mae Feta ofa, Qos Sa ASA IBA TATA afarces Biers Fore tare Vat Fae, “afar afb Serb coer aE FR HATTER SCA ATCA MS HLAITETS RC ASCO 2 I” Claires FG TASIT SAI | wialteta STTATAS set SR, Fe wry “walghoaed’; ‘ae’ “os ACT Rove agian Ter TIE NY, CRE ame Car afters Taal fea eT pe area wa tae WAT “PIGeI AMS w Sy Sere TIL RAITT — a8 oR cemrars Sreee at fier ries at erate was Use| Raney wi PoE aetaclatenna Cane shaaices at— afte os etztera (School) aay GAT dam Dita A BEM wars aC, Deis <2 as a Reshece aa AI piace PSSA STH BAT | Rao Teg HAST TSA AAS AAT A APTANA SHS ett SEAT ee SRS, TAMAS: CSM SAE | MIAATOAT MIG aT AR, AAMT AAA STAT GR RETTA FEA 6 Five Pemfers aI; ata LR APOE des HIP GAT Reerrors aS AIA OR CoE ANT GR Gl ASR aaPaS Fey Pate © Sater | Reerreais wa fies fe aenferw nt waralae face eH a HIE aA TET wegre, Rear Dols CRAB AB e rIsIcaa MSHA ASS ASST Te | ASAT TATA, afS-com-oie-awera acts aw Fors oer wlzers TOS aa TA haa TNT Rens ara HeSceR, Slaacts etfs Gras Wold AAA MAA ACA | ATS AR 6 AACA ACT CATS HIS HA, TICS ATCA PHS aI Tac Ie eat SO ores atest iia-ay coe fea, wlaa vasa TH Dips fe ceaeren afiat areal Bia ener ete Feet ere Fares FRemaaIoy mle ou was oieH DS fen wa saTERA Tet wer! Sacal SAT wes FSS AON CTI Fett BE “Sekat Fen’) ofS wg ae mefemera ama SH CHT Fey, Treat vol I Fe Tes eats wre (meta speaking), wraiears wiiSat wal we ae HAE Hae OTT | aS 2A 6 feta Ui STRCIA ATT Pears eee Ba, wa eT Cla AG Cole Be | Fas We Xe BARAT, Sata Trwat ais wan wear OHTereTs ir fra aft 48 crigketaficea Linguistic nation statist identity aa aface aR wale Feat enitrara Rona crenas ate, cont, fear at omit few Fen, cet aia aaaia ets Palio Se ORI Ver cl tet Bafaw a, IA Aerie (coat ‘ace retrospection) 1a aM BEATE, SMIACA Clete Feet sea | eA Bacar Rone wera er FR CHT AAA, OIA to CeAlRET GAVE OT APICES Fo yet oe wa) aide, Cra ara Va AMAA AeA BIA SET AAT 22 Oils ARPS MN UHHAT | SO Ora US So TEA THA “VTE SRA” HG TAIT GT APSR’ Be “AeA eT FH” (tH AE wD) RS OR AH AA Eat sifemni : “NG SIE (SH) THA BT, frre feat Bester eIBz Coat” TR Od AA CHET 2 “STH HONEA GAM LR PAA...” BHF | Swsrin aire eeria ae cHRena wlan “aR we MPIC ae SEACH S Hoe Ak One? ras ary SEA | CHIT Be Pow eI Cw AB were Ferner et-ten Sera] iets Geib al Soa rc | Rea SMT ARS Beale Beas Beas ‘Weal Fhetatee, “having only appearence of...” 3 “simulated, decietful, false.” wae rer asker TTA” wre wee SH ane Sofas ora Sys ahs CM Al Gly OOD ace, fon fog) wet fe? yews sere, “Carrel acne SRN TH AS VS i wfSawe Fox” “ora yaaa aA Aare cera TAT Sra SCR RK ORI HSH PRA CHEAT BATH HAMA GaTwY/ Hse ae Bzay abre, oleta gacea, {f&@-aniba yore bos via aitiba seo 72 otter caET Tews ores a2 Aci a WE eraats Heat rem eae aia ora Fat oat aiatat Fert etcam, wiaiors ena wey RIC eIgKea fara way OI ofS OH | AAT era’ Ries Aiea gates ania Tine? aI ere TAY? Carer cater at Boat ara’ WIMIDTEA Mabe eS BRA) He, HA’; He’ att whoa Gisicottagal 173 GE, CHPAS WOM Dintcrticwa; ‘GET Hr Wee Ww Bara coals ye Ragerl-zS MTHS IS ACRE HE FALSE AT... | ‘feat aaeRet FOIE AE Aes Hele wa Veere cx efor palais cals ca Frecerrera com frat vet a aR) wleist erie cred Foure’ HRRAH IfecoR, FAP ROGEA PAA VA SHAMS aoe | HAS Pa salam aA Svat Graets AI Boaiahocs wlgal wwlaws Fea sca | re ATTA 19 GAZ ACA HGS MISA ANS anf arate stermte oaoray 2204 AT) BLOHOcs Ona HAA tea OAs AR, was valet afte ARI wens TOES Be wry Wa HI rE ARate/—wen Hd /-Bered Bele oar Feat et | SATS Foy BIER | ra Feratohy yaaa VARIA AB IGT Zoe aca, SiotT Sole Roe aia TOT OAIRY Seta CaeniecRT way BRE MCE | laa me aos ARehes weed BENET aa a Gren ory oats Peet Beceren | Faber ert apie shew viferwce Tre CHAT OER at | re, Bala 39 frat Sleral winaaias oreywer Cleat aaa eur vlaBowre |e Ma meta (anatomo-bio-polities) ae fee 4 2}4-areafoa aE PCIe Pera SCT A Fee ates ofl c Pace ata, Clea Ohare Biers AMC MAAR, (CD) Val ast aT Goos Far-aioacr wee Sra al; (GI) aga ae Yeror, elaial Ra-Borgionce arora alent sear wel wa Bfrcra At (Anthropocentric limit) 4a 8123 | GH44 UPiats FE ARI wa ae, aire saree, “Tel aca aefoerx (efor = ufos ait wIRas ara faeprex wr) aaMet EE OS ae ae ENTE UTI Hae afoeri wart pret snag aa Heuer CYT obs Portas A TIC wey ificefe, was otft emis *faoat (care of self @t epimelia heateu) 74am FHC Steere! PEACOHR | TSA Coote Wa] VAs STA GraMiw aaa fowa ae Seon aRRAICR | waa agar UPR -TPRCS AAA cteral AAA, Grr da wT, AMI WIS CGA Tes AeA 4 ia Gears else Whe ore oe MAA HA SCS, igor 421 Sia aay oP aera yee Holeat SH cy vata +h, orece ‘Rate SIT Fem wWeew aca “A secret guide to exquisite kaya sadha na”! efSOT Daa SN CFA HAI’ | Bb Sara Cls-Sry Te AACS RA ae WaT Raw eae aI wATAS GisNw (folk-we) 6 Verse eicwrecT EAT ‘almiaa (discourse reception) APys Sie | Ba are Bt VSIA TAPAS e SAAT STE caver | aR mes arf SR Fret SS SIT /A, OTN 6 GISPtA Va Dao GSAT aa near Rare aface afar! 8 anes sof airs nfl yerw fea sae ‘Sherrie frm”, oselaa “aayitin” 6 ules erga “Sule” aa were Hef HHSA-WSH ates GH Feratofa Gots 1 feared, Sra onal arn we afaibe, wat aGara wey ce Hee A ater Sar sarofe, oie ate: fey’ tea afer Rratbs | oronla fg ae) creas feer UES os Te VSIA! Ca LEN DE’ @ walt fey wim MAE THIGo WMA TAA ass Gorniers wile (Gala aay Mela HKCAAITS 97 Hee z syn- cretic amalgamated text) 7710# Teo aie SrA ete Te | oe Sree secure ona ere Shire saat Aas SOC AS’, Ta Ve +t | Set Bala Be Zara meray aa sets Fi) fe’ Cuts, v0) at Reese ores Fat StAST BIT AGRI atest iTS evITA BreTHaA | wie TaRl (SiH) Rephon’ sages |e ore TAVIS, SAI SMe ats s We Bora PS Sow Tasat’ as SAS fe (arbitrary sounds Ti signs) fete at By wy ww Ba Sowa Aes Dw, Sha WHS Bal FUSISHT | LARA Cr WH, BIA ee (ARR) SAR | GTS ITAA ROS rs WA WA BA BOI BCA! AA MH BAAS AT MGT” | AB GAY aaa HS aeI9y afaaert Ses HIG Bee 3 7S AGIs HOSE SA (ARIA AT BSYS}) ag STAS ATT PY PST | HAUS TA A GIS | Caals orcs orate shea (AGH Mar APH aa afeal ot fowca Foren yesigeda alata SrA Stans Bie) Fat Faeo aA AGTH UitS 3 DaTAA AN 8 SIRS, tawE CS enfora, weHlr yrs oPotoray GAT’ xb Ae2ta PRRICH | os sip fret fren” carats (Se) | ofr “Agha” | ai een SZ | a ARENA TE MAA GLB, ORI AA S| AZ oes as, ADIN, yerATs ee ARG | tants Balers as aioe fale eae | GA HAS AKAASIS’ (Daly, 09) she Tayq BIEL! ATPAAM’ Gaile, TE AAA ASS | GSAT oS Vase are Hatcas “Asay” s af Teale creel ert Qaians Akrra Ug | Uh brees Sot see 2 Bas wel ESacaw = “Owrass PAC ASK “ACS |” TATA / TAI GT Fae ew Fo BAe FETs YR ANOS WET ITT AUIS FATA AAT / GAGES Seales osEA BIT UA AR TGS THAIS OTS | AIA BATT / Fetal / teat / he / Fy cze wiles mer lel / Patent / aaa / Soe ee, BATT TAT NAGS APT SSA ALT eS HOT SATAY At HT GAR CTFACS WS TA NS Has HOSTS MCR S RS ov He] ARB THEY a, CMAN CPC LATS; OTA TAPAS OIL few 8 6 aifira 02 wey AME ofa! cats BreTE FF, DOTA, CUM GRA Bee CATERED coteiRaw 1 Becw Boies Sides eter aay Aes za Frat @ AE Ma) aI GIP areR CHARI, OO ATOI ww VS-aASroTA oN cea ate Beata fey crGat 8 org we a AR] eBarce! wet eat Oden AR oT SPAS TIC | Sea CAA CHEE TA BA MOL wid BS eal GIA wigforw Woh Dalat ye 6 D¢ Cw IONS Tre Berane BART Bee, wlaCs ata Fea THR A afore ameR | wes aR Ica CA aferatA TIA Va KATH ‘Biagra Saws CoH (Graduation) (2a ar afeys wets Bom caw Rey eles welGt BTS | Ber ariced Diare one caret Bara, Aacata YS’ (BC wd, spark Grex, gala afte ‘oI’ «A TART eee! an Taw ew Ae! RE’ AA SASS Bea, VPIS-y (my-ness)| Al; Was ae, aI Chie Svat CR Oratay Pisce eeace aT Fe Aare carataew faPranocMTeY’ (fit for use) | Sal gana Oral San ser, Tel AMAT SIs Bats Stat CoN Ree CORT ea, CITT OH TS fe? ele ay ATS ORICA (ISTE PRD) Aree 3 Betas Conley Geel | AIL TARAS WAS “KereHead”, fArretawn’ Bont A NEA! AS PERTES UIC-ofS OIA TAP! ates ETP Bhat (FRR) Bra... 1 Frans vel fraiféeqs “A secret guide to exquisite k ayasadhana” afat whee foes rferer RCAC Gras SSH feat Franfei Sarl Set saree (Care CRIS WH Ae, TNS TWH) caAlVAs coh Fey Ver aT eae PA ear He-caretwAA FA! CRIT Ge seay Vout Seat | SAT-cormvin Bara CaP ste AAT aT | fee oa 925 ATs Ba) ait aan Tadic ve five sat Rie Roce vient, ery ae AA ace cl eI Rw ee wle wre er a DAleteT frre Rice Fiat orienuca Merwe Shien aera ew Boee: 5 © 8 \ a ne aX ee [area Sota fieutem freynod Frat AS | : was Ay ae “Set -ETCAT | jevefae tat weal amare) Asay ‘aferaed (#21 71) (reser eat zen) | area) | (Sezer) ara ar are fee ar | are abract worRCT SP Fates (Reamer a} par are Tee estat (Ae) sap Saopr I sae aa ahabres-& rh era Rete 3) [Se the seals Weegee] ax es

    You might also like