ag aq 3.007 (1284) SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN WALTER KAMBULOW Plaintiff = and - TORONTO AIRPORT CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP JOHN ARNOTT and STEPHEN LONG Defendants MOTION before the Honourable Mr. Justice Clarke on the 15% of January, 2008 at Milton, Ontario APPEARANCES W. KAMBULOW Self represented P. MIEHLS Counsel for the defendants1d 1 | as 1 Kambulow v Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship et al JANUARY 15, 2008 THE COURT: Counsel, are you here on a case? MS. MIEHLS: Yes, I am. THE COURT: What are case are you acting for? MS. MIERLS: I’m acting for Toronto Airport on the first matter, Toronto Airport... THE COURT: Sir, what's your name? MR. KAMBULOW: Walter Kambulow. THE COURT: Oh, yes, sir. All right. I’ve gone through the file. Take a seat, sir. You're Patricia... MS. MIEHLS: Pamela Miehls, Your Honour. THE COURT: I’m sorry. MS. MIEHLS: That’s okay. THE COURT: You're Pamela... MS. MIEHLS: Miehls. THE COURT: ...Miehls - M-E.. MS. MIEHLS: M-I-E-H-L-s. THE COURT: Miehls. MS. MIEHLS: Yes. THE COURT: Ms. Miehls, I’ve gone through the file and I’ve looked at the nature of the - actually, there are two files, there are two actions, actually, one is a Statement of Claim in Toronto.... MS. MIEHLS: Correct. THE COURT: -.and there's Statement of Claim in Milton. And I’ve read the allegations made by the Plaintiff, Mr. Kambulow, and I’ve read the15) 2 2 EN oer 1298 Kambulow v Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship et al allegations made - your position on all of this. MS. MIEHLS: Correct. THE COURT: And I note that the action in Toronto was started on October the 18" and then on the 29 of October the second action was started here in Milton, and I note too that you've got a motion for injunction and contempt combined now for the 13” of I think, February, isn’t it. MS. MIEHLS: That’s correct. THE COURT: ...in Toronto? MS. MIEHLS: Right. THE COURT: And to cut to the chase I’m going to hear you out if you have anything to say about this. I know you're seeking to strike out the Plaintiff’s Statement of Claim today... MS. MIEHLS: Correct. THE COURT: ...but I’m very loathe to do that. But I am very, very open to the idea of consolidating this matter and moving them to Toronto... MS. MIEHLS: Okay. THE COURT: ...because I do think that they interweave, and subject to what you say I think it’s in the interest of justice that they be consolidated. Now, do you disagree with that? MS. MIEHLS: No, I completely agree with the fact that the matter should be transferred to Toronto if it still stands. THE COURT: You want me to strike out his claim today. MS. MIEHLS: I want you to strike out the claim