Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agenda
NXP System/Application Landscape Need for BI Archiving ST-Addons: Near Line Storage (NLS) Solution Proof of Concept BI Archiving
NXP Semiconductors
NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NASDAQ: NXPI) provides High Performance Mixed Signal and Standard Product solutions that leverage its leading RF, Analog, Power Management, Interface, Security and Digital Processing expertise. Our innovations are used in a wide range of automotive, identification, wireless infrastructure, lighting, industrial, mobile, consumer and computing applications. A global semiconductor company with operations in more than 25 countries, NXP posted revenue of $4.4 billion in 2010.
CATV infrastructure
Broadcasting
Personal health
Chargers
In-vehicle networking Car access & immobilizers Car entertainment Solid State Lighting Telematics Lighting
Tablet PCs Note- /Netbooks Desktops Power supplies. Monitors and peripherals
Agenda
NXP System/Application Landscape Need for BI Archiving ST-Addons: Near Line Storage (NLS) Solution Proof of Concept BI Archiving
Bex analyzer
CHAMP (Netweaver)
2500
> 1000 2.2 Terabyte 10 billion
Agenda
NXP System/Application Landscape Need for BI Archiving ST-Addons: Near Line Storage (NLS) Solution Proof of Concept BI Archiving
BW Accelerator requires that data growth is controlled -> this can be achieved by regularly archiving data
2.
What if not?
Strong growth of BW database leads to operational issues and complexity (adding storage) Performance decreasing over time Inefficient usage of storage
Other possibilities for Archiving -> Near Line Storage solutions from Development Partners
Agenda
NXP System/Application Landscape Need for BI Archiving ST-Addons: Near Line Storage (NLS) Solution Proof of Concept BI Archiving
13
Column-based Architecture
Relational Database
c 1 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 c 2 c 3 c 4 c 5 c 6 c 7 c 8 c 9
Data is stored horizontally in rows Reporting is very I/O-intensive No effective query access
SYBASE IQ
c 1 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 c 2 c 3 c 4 c 5 c 6 c 7 c 8 c 9
Agenda
NXP System/Application Landscape Need for BI Archiving ST-Addons: Near Line Storage (NLS) Solution Proof of Concept (PoC) BI Archiving
Why PoC? Scope PoC Expectations PoC Results PoC Business Case
17
Disadvantage:
Investment required (both license and hardware)
NLS IQ
SFF_O60
SFF_O63
19
Yes
Yes Yes Yes In most cases Yes 1 day
20
Yes
Yes Yes Yes In most cases Yes 1 day
Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes No 4 a 5 hours
21
Query response times NLS vs Online database (lower value means faster response time)
Response time in Seconds
250 218 200 155 150 96 65 50 37 9 0 Query 1, NLS data (3.016.771) Query 1, Online data (2.708.379) Query 2, NLS data Query 2, Online Query 3, NLS data (1.962.052) data (8.698.215) (6.980.163) Tested query ( avg. selected records ) Query 3, Online data (5.390.737) 32 13 6 1 before archiving 68 After archiving
100
92
Query 1 & 2 are real-world PCA querys Query 3 is a test query aggregating 1 keyfigure of a large amount PCA data on year level. Query 3 online data performance increase also due to other factors (upgrade Oracle 11) Correctness of output data all querys verified
22
Write
Store
Delete
Restore
23
Sizing
Decrease online storage (by the amount of archived data) Increase NLS storage
Compression factor: less promising results after Oracle 11.2g then initially, but measurements so far show a reduction of 50%
24
Yearly fee (recurring) Maintenance fee for PBS software (17%) Server costs Production (. eur/mnth) Optional: Server costs Quality assurance/test ( eur/mnth) TAM costs Total yearly fee (recurring)
25
120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 Cost for storage (yearly) when using archiving Cost for storage (yearly) w/o archiving Net saving
2011
-20000 -40000 -60000
2012
2013
2014
900000 800000 700000 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 Cumulative net saving including avoidance of additional BWA costs 2011 -100000 2012 2013 2014 Net saving including avoidance of additional BWA costs per year Net saving
Agenda
NXP System/Application Landscape Need for BI Archiving ST-Addons: Near Line Storage (NLS) Solution Proof of Concept BI Archiving
28
Next steps
Decide on initial investment Arrange license for PBS together with purchasing Make PBS archiving productive
Install production server and productive license Determine order of infocubes/DSOs to archive (based on combination of size and availability of a partitioning entity) Embed in structural process
29
Summary
Archiving in BW is a must. There are two options:
Archiving solution
Standard SAP (ADK)
Pro
Cheap
Con
Investment in BWA expansion required Time-consuming and cumbersome process to read from archive plus issue when data structure changes In case no investment in BWA expansion is/can be done: certain functional areas will have to be removed from the BWA -> performance decrease for end users No compression so hardly any saving on storage costs
Remarks
Reporting performance improvement, read directly from archive Data loading performance improvement Enables control over growth of BWA, no investment in BWA required
Strong business case in case majority of data in BWA is suitable for archiving
30