Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
×
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
2010-05-27 Amrstrong's Reply in Support of 2255

2010-05-27 Amrstrong's Reply in Support of 2255

Ratings: (0)|Views: 299|Likes:
Published by Hamilton Taft

More info:

Published by: Hamilton Taft on Jan 25, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less

01/25/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 
ARMSTRONG’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION
123456789101112131415161718192021222324CONNIE C. ARMSTRONG, JR.8309 Laughing Waters TrailMcKinney Texas, 75070Telephone: 469-212-2316e-mail:chip.armstrong@yahoo.com Petitioner
Pro Se
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAOAKLAND DIVISIONCONNIE C. ARMSTRONG, JR.
Petitioner v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
 Respondent 
No. CR 94 276 PJHARMSTRONG’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTIONArmstrong submits this Reply in support of his pending motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255and in traverse of the factual allegations and legal argument provided in the government’sresponse of July 24, 2009.
 
 
ARMSTRONG’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION Page i
123456789101112131415161718192021222324
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. iIndex of Authorities ........................................................................................................................ iiStatement of Issues ..........................................................................................................................1Statement of Facts ............................................................................................................................1Argument .........................................................................................................................................2A. Armstrong’s claims are properly before the court. ................................................2B. Improper suppression of 
 Brady
material requires thatArmstrong’s conviction be set aside. .......................................................................41. Summary ......................................................................................................42. Legal Standard .............................................................................................53. The Undisclosed Prior Investigation ............................................................64. The Undisclosed Political Pressure ..............................................................85. The Undisclosed Collusion with the Bankruptcy Trustee .........................10C. Fraud on the court requires that Armstrong’s conviction be set aside. ..................14Conclusion .....................................................................................................................................15Signature ................................................................................................................... Signature PageCertificate of Service .............................................................................. Certificate of Service Page
 
 
ARMSTRONG’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION Page ii
123456789101112131415161718192021222324
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
Cases
 
 Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Veneman
, 490 F.3d 725 (9th Cir. 2007) ...................................... 13
 Banks v. Dretke
, 540 U.S. 668 (2004). ........................................................................................... 4
 Bernstein v. Universal Pictures, Inc
., 79 F.R.D. 59 (S.D. N.Y. 1978) ........................................... 7
 Bousley v. United States
, 523 U.S. 614 (1998) ............................................................................... 3
 Carrington v. United States
, 503 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2007). ........................................................... 4
Clay v. United States
, 537 U.S. 522 (2003). ............................................................................... 2, 3
 Dodd v. Hood River County
, 59 F.3d 852 (9th Cir.1995). ............................................................ 11
Ferrell v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co.,
393 F.3d 786 (8th Cir. 2005); .............................................. 12
Gantt v. Roe
, 389 F.3d 908 (9th Cir. 2004). ............................................................................... 4, 6
 In re ABA Recovery Service, Inc.,
110 B.R. 484, 488 (Bankr. S.D. Cal.1990). ........................... 13
 In re Hamilton Taft,
53 F.3d 285 (9th Cir. 1995) ......................................................................... 10
 In re Intermagnetics America, Inc.,
926 F.2d 912 (9th Cir.1991) ................................................ 15
 In re Levander 
, 180 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 1999) ....................................................................... 14, 15
 In re U. S. Financial Securities Litigation
, 75 F.R.D. 702 (S.D. Cal. 1977) .................................. 8
 Jimenez v. Quarterman
, 129 S.Ct. 681 (2009); .............................................................................. 2
 Jones v. S.E.C.,
115 F.3d 1173 (4th Cir. 1997); ........................................................................... 12
Kunzelman v. Thompson
, 799 F.2d 1172 (7th Cir. 1986). ............................................................ 12
Kyles v. Whitley
, 514 U.S. 419 (1995). ........................................................................................... 5
 Memorex Corp. v. IBM Corp.,
458 F. Supp. 423 (N.D. Cal. 1978) ................................................ 7
 Missouri v. Jenkins
, 495 U.S. 33 (1990) ......................................................................................... 3
 Mitchell v. McCaughtry
, 291 F. Supp.2d 823 (E.D. Wis. 2003) .................................................... 4

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->