Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
7Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Google Amicus Brief in Cariou v Prince

Google Amicus Brief in Cariou v Prince

Ratings: (0)|Views: 4,730 |Likes:
Published by pbfriedman
Amicus brief filed by Google in Patrick Cariou v. Richard Prince, purportedly in favor of neither party but arguing re the transformative nature of many different kinds of appropriations
Amicus brief filed by Google in Patrick Cariou v. Richard Prince, purportedly in favor of neither party but arguing re the transformative nature of many different kinds of appropriations

More info:

Published by: pbfriedman on Jan 27, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/14/2012

pdf

text

original

 
11-1197-cv
 
IN THE
 
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
 P
 ATRICK 
C
 ARIOU
,
 Plaintiff-Appellee,
 
v.
R
ICHARD
P
RINCE
,
 
 Defendant-Appellant,
G
 AGOSIAN
G
 ALLERY 
,
 
I
NC
.,
 
L
 AWRENCE
G
 AGOSIAN
,
 Defendants-Cross-Defendants-Appellants.
 ___________ On Appeal from the United States District Courtfor the Southern District of New York
BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE GOOGLE INC.IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY
Of Counsel:
Oliver MetzgerG
OOGLE
I
NC
.1600 Amphitheatre ParkwayMountain View, CA 94043650-253-0000Joseph C. GratzD
URIE
T
 ANGRI
LLP217 Leidesdorff StreetSan Francisco, CA 94111415-362-6666
ttorneys for Amicus CuriaeGoogle Inc.
 
Case: 11-1197 Document: 130 Page: 1 11/02/2011 436711 27
 
i
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, counsel foramicus curiae certifies the following information:Google Inc. has no parent corporation, and no publicly heldcorporation owns ten percent or more of its stock.
Case: 11-1197 Document: 130 Page: 2 11/02/2011 436711 27
 
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTSP
 AGE
N
O
.
IDENTITY AND INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ...........................1
 
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................................................2
 
 ARGUMENT ..........................................................................................4
 
I.
 
 A use need not comment on the original in orderto be transformative. .........................................................4
 
II.
 
The court should be particularly cognizant of theimpact of its decision on digital uses of manyworks at once, which rarely comment but arefrequently held to be transformative. ...............................9
 
III.
 
If a use is otherwise fair, it does not matterwhether the defendant sought a license.......................... 17
 
CONCLUSION ..................................................................................... 20
 
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ..................................................... 21
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .............................................................. 22
 
Case: 11-1197 Document: 130 Page: 3 11/02/2011 436711 27

Activity (7)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Ben Sheffner liked this
Ian McDiarmard liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->