Sequel #4 to 'Nut Case" Islamic Conspiracy Weavers Are A Bane To Truth and RealityINTRODUCTION:As one author brought out in his book, “In The Truth about Muhammad,” New YorkTimes bestselling author and Islam expert Robert Spencer offers an honest andtelling portrait of the founder of Islam that all should read.But Islam can not deal with exposure of the truth since it is a dungy religionthat worships a false god, the mythical old middle eastern celestial mood god,"Allah," actually controlled per 2 Corinthians 4:4 by the god of this system ofthings to mislead mankind, “In whom the god of this world hath blinded the mindsof unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is theimage of God, should not shine unto them” (Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible; DRCB).Some of their members will go to extreme lengths to cover-up the wrong doings oftheir particular beloved Muslim religious leader. Now one may rightfully askwhy!Well, let’s look into it. Islam has taken the blood guilt on themselves forfailure to take action against their wicked and evil Muslim religious leaders –how, by their failure to act when they had the responsibility to do so. Butshould this cause a surprise? Remember, it is not what either the Bible or theBible knockoff the Qur'an actually say, but how religious leaders be they priestand/or sheiks or imams or muftis or what ever teach the people is theinterpretation of what is written either in the Bible or the bible knockoff theQur'an that matters and governs actions. It matters not what the Bible and/orthe Bible knockoff really say. People go by what they are taught by theirreligious leaders. Take the genocide committed by the Roman Catholic Church atthe direction of their supreme religious leader, the pope, what mattered was notthat the Bible clearly said at Exodus 20:13, "Thou shalt not kill." (AuthorizedKing James Bible; AV), but what their religious leaders told them. Therefore, itis the religion at fault, irregardless of what their particular holy book, be itthe Bible or the Bible knockoff the Qur'an may say. Neither is so calledChristianity or in Islam are most individuals actions really governed in any wayby what their particular holy book really says, but they are governed by theinterpretation of their religious leaders. Thus, knowing this reality, one wouldbe either just plain stupid and/or dumb to even bother looking at a particularreligion's holy book and expect the members would conform to it. Take the RigVede and find me for example a Hindu actually conforming to it instead of theinterpretation given to it by his religious leaders, like looking for a needle inthe haystack per K.S. Lal, India's greatest historian.In fact, the Qur’an clearly says at Sura 5:13 That one should be kind to others.Let’s look at this Sura from three different versions of the Quran:Sura 5:13 AL-MAEDA (THE TABLE, THE TABLE SPREAD). Which we shall show from threedifferent versions/translations, requires members of Islam to be kind with others.Now let's look at how it stated in three different versions of the Qur'an.YUSUFALI: But because of their breach of their covenant, We cursed them, and madetheir hearts grow hard; they change the words from their (right) places and forgeta good part of the message that was sent them, nor wilt thou cease to find them-barring a few - ever bent on (new) deceits: but forgive them, and overlook (theirmisdeeds): [b]for Allah loveth those who are kind.[/b]PICKTHAL: And because of their breaking their covenant, We have cursed them andmade hard their hearts. They change words from their context and forget a part of
that whereof they were admonished. Thou wilt not cease to discover treachery fromall save a few of them. But bear with them and pardon them. Lo! [b]Allah loveththe kindly.[/b]SHAKIR: But on account of their breaking their covenant We cursed them and madetheir hearts hard; they altered the words from their places and they neglected aportion of what they were reminded of; and you shall always discover treachery inthem excepting a few of them; so pardon them and turn away; [b]surely Allah lovesthose who do good (to others).[/b]So obviously this evil and wicked Muslim religious leader, Osama bin Ladin was inviolation of this Sura.Of course the same situation exist among so called Christians, but NOT amonggenuine true followers of Jesus (Yeshua) Christ. In fact, there is a book thatasks and answers the question with respect what the Bible really says, “What Doesthe Bible Really Teach,” by Watch Tower Bible and Track Society of Pennsylvania.Now let’s look at an actual example of how they try and mislead and confuse tocover-up wrong doing by one Muslim religious leader who is beloved by many misleadindividuals, such as the one’s example I am using, Sheik Osama bin Ladin.“Let the reader judge whether the sites I gave are outlandishing or launching warand killing innocent people based on STUPID CONFESSION TAPE is just plane stupidand evil. Read on:Senator Max Cleland – Former member of the 9/11 Commission, resigned December2003. U.S. Senator from Georgia 1996-2002. Currently serves on the board ofdirectors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. Administrator of U.S.Veterans Administration 1977-1981. Awarded Silver Star and Bronze Star for U.S.Army bravery in Viet Nam. Triple amputee from war injuries.Boston Globe Article 11/13/03: "If this decision stands [to limit 9/11 Commissionaccess to White House documents], I, as a member of the commission, cannot lookany American in the eye, especially family members of victims, and say thecommission had full access. This investigation is now compromised."http://www.bost on.com/... - Link to Boston Globe articleURL: http://www.wanttoknow.inf o/officialsquestion911com missionreport”Clearly this lover of Muslim religious leader, Sheik Osama bin Ladin, eitherwillfully or by ignorance, overlooks the political in-play in Senate Commissions,and either does NOT recognize them for what they are and/or is just playingignorant of same. In US politics it is common practice for one party to disagreewith the other and make comments like this to ‘score’ points in the arena ofpublic opinion. However, this does not affect reality in any way.This same lover of evil and wicked Sheik Osama bin Ladin went on to say,“You think you can shut up the truth by deleting my comments and only leavingyours unchallenged??? Well forget it. Not with CONFESSION TAPE, you can't convinceus the truth using confession tape. Its only for retards. Read on:"By now you have probably heard that many of the “hijackers” named by the FBI arealive and well. The Information Times, an on-line publication, reported that SaudiArabia’s Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al-Faisal told the Arabic Press aftermeeting with President George W. Bush on Sept. 20: “It was proved that five of thenames included in the FBI list had nothing to do with what happened.”
Accor ding to The Orlando Sentinel, the Saudi Arabian embassy confirmed that fourof the five mentioned by Al-Faisal - Saeed Alghamdi, Mohand Alshehri, AbdulazizAlomari and Salem Alhazmi- are not dead and had nothing to do with the heinousterror attacks in New York and Washington. (source: Christopher J. Petherick -American Free Press)From photos of all of those that perished on that flight, it is clear that noneare even “Arab looking.” This seems to rule out Arabs sneaking aboard underassumed names...."URL: http://www.physics911.net /olmsted”But he overlooks the fact that the FBI made mistakes with regard to identity earlyon in the case before they could double check identity information and also due totheir dealing with unfamiliar name types – so what? Now, let’s look at realityafter they had time to shift through all the data and get familiar with unfamiliarname types.[1] The first hijackers to arrive in the United States were Khalid al-Mihdhar andNawaf al-Hazmi, who settled in the San Diego area in January 2000. They werefollowed by Mohamed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, and Ziad Jarrah, who all arrived earlyin the summer of 2000, in order to undertake flight training in south Florida. Thefourth pilot, Hani Hanjour, arrived in San Diego in December 2000. The othermuscle hijackers, who were trained to help overpower and take over the aircraft,all arrived in the spring and early summer of 2001. [[Now today as we all know,they are dead.]][2] Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi were both experienced and respectedjihadists in the eyes of al-Qaeda leader, Osama bin Laden. Mihdhar and Hazmi bothhad previous experience fighting on Bosnia, and had trained during the 1990s atcamps in Afghanistan.[1] When Bin Laden committed to the September 11 attacks plotidea, he assigned both Mihdhar and Hazmi to the plot.[2] Both were so eager toparticipate in operations within the United States, that they obtained visas inApril 1999.[3] Once selected, Mihdhar and Hazmi were sent to the Mes Aynaktraining camp in Afghanistan. In late 1999, Hazmi, Attash and Yemeni went toKarachi, Pakistan to see Mohammed, who instructed them on Western culture andtravel; however, Mihdhar did not go to Karachi, instead returning to Yemen.[2][3] Two flight attendants called the American Airlines [[Flight 11]] reservationdesk during the hijacking. Betty Ong reported that "the four hijackers had comefrom first-class seats: 2A, 2B, 9A, and 9B."[4] Flight attendant Amy Sweeneycalled a flight services manager at Logan Airport and described them as MiddleEastern.[4] She gave the staff the seat numbers and they pulled up the ticket andcredit card info of the hijackers, identifying Mohamed Atta al-Sayed.[5][4] Two hijackers, Hani Hanjour and Majed Moqed were identified by clerks ashaving bought single, first-class tickets for Flight 77 from Advance TravelService in Totowa, NJ with $1,842.25 in cash.[5] Two of the passengers had been on the FBI's terrorist-alert list: KhalidAlmihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi. [[Lax check in or they would have been identifiedbefore boarding.]][6] Forensic remains of the five hijackers were found at the Pentagon, along withremains of the victims.
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Notes
Load more
