Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
McKee Appeal Brief1

McKee Appeal Brief1

Ratings: (0)|Views: 55 |Likes:
Published by nphillips0304

More info:

Published by: nphillips0304 on Jan 31, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/20/2013

pdf

text

original

 
INTHEMISSOURICOURTOFAPPEALSEASTERNDISTRICT
BONZELLASMITH,
etal
Respondents
)
)
)
)AppealNo.ED95733
))
)
)
VS.
TIFCOMMISSIONERS,
etal.,
Appellants.
AppealfromtheCircuitCourtofSt.LouisCity,MissouriCase
No.0922~CC9379
Hon,
Robert
H.
Dierker,Jr.Division18
BRIEFOFAPPELLANTNORTHSIDEREGENERATION,LLC
Paul
J.
Puricelli,
#32801RobbE.Hellwig,#60570Stone,Leyton
&
Gershman,AProfessionalCorporation7733
ForsythBlvd.,
Suite500
st.
Louis,Missouri63105
(314)721-7011(314)
721-8660
pjp@stoneleyton.comrhellwig@stoneleyton,com
AttorneysforAppellantNorthsideRegeneration,LLC
 
TABLEOFCONTENTS
TABLEOFAUTHORITmS....~~...
t.....
1...,,;.,
i~ff,,.....,•,
,4
JURISDICTIONALSTATEMENT,,,,,,",6STATEMENTOFFACTS",.12
PO.IN"TSIrnLIEDON
ill
01
f
I
t
I
t••
If.
i
ill
01.,.•I•I..
t••
i..
I1..I.;.
ill••
t
'ill~
t
I••
25
ARGUMENT
PointI,.
I.'ItIIi•,,
t
I,.1,.1
.t
+.
i
It
t
''I.
It.,.
t
I
'"iII'.t,.,",
i•'"I
'i
,.29
I.THETRIALCOURTERREDINRULINGTHATTHEREDEVELOPMENTORDINANCESLACKEDAREDEVELOPMENTPROJECTANDTIIUSDIDNOTSATISFYTHETIFACTBECAUSERESPONDENTSFAILEDTORAISEANYLEGALORFACTUALCHALLENGEBASEDUPONTIlELACKORSUFFICIENCYOFAREDEVELOPMENTPROJECTINTHEIRPLEADINGSORATTRIALANDTHEREFOREWAIVEDANYSUCHCHALLENGEPoint
rr.~
iI.,
t,,I;~,
','11
"',t
t••
III
't
Iti
'11"'11~
,.'11"'
34
n.
THETRIALCOURTERREDINRULINGTHATTHEREDEVELOPMENTORDINANCESLACKEDAREDEVELOPMENTPROJECTANDTHEREFOREDIDNOTSATISFYTHETIFACfBECAUSETHETRIALCOURT'SNEWDEFINITIONOFAREDEVELOPMENTPROJECTISCONTRARYTOTHEBROADDEFINITIONOFREDEVELOPMENTPROJECTUNDER,ANDTHEINTENTOFTHETIFACT;ANDTHEREDEVELOPMENT
 
ORDINANCESINCLUDEDAREDEVELOPMENTPROJECT'\VITIllN
THE
MEANINGOF
THE
TIFACT.
Point
ill.,.
t
14
f.'
t.
01.I01~I'011.1'
a.
10101
t••
t.
01..01..-.01
ill
1,01
't'"
.44
III.THETRIALCOURTERREDINRULINGTHAT
ran
REDEVELOPMENTORDINANCESDIDNOTSATISFYTHETIFACTBECAUSETHEORDINANCESLACKEDACOST-BENEFITANALYSISREFERABLETOASPECIFICPROJECTBECAUSETHETIFACTDOESNOTREQUIREACOSTBENEFITANALYSISINCONNECTIONWITHINDIVIDUALRE;DEVELOPMENTPROJECTS;RATHER,RSMo§99.810.1(5)REQUIRESACOST-BENEFITANALYSISOFTHEREDEVELOPMENTPLANASAWHOLE.PointIV,",.,,"'"49IV.THETRIALCOURTABUSEDITSDISCRETIONANDERREDINDENYINGNORTHSIDE'SMOTIONFORANEWTRIALBECAUSE,ASSUMINGTHETRIALCOURT'SNEWDEFINITIONOF"REDEVELOPMENTPROJECT"ANDASSUMINGTHEREDEVELOPMENTOUDINANCESDIDNOTOTHERWISECONTAINAREDEVELOPMENTPROJECT,THECOURTSHOULDHAVEALLO'WEDNORTHSIDETOPRESENTEVIDENCEOF
.
,
REDEVELOPMENTPROJECTSAPPROVEDBYTHECITYBOARDOFALDERMEN.
2

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->