Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
See Premium Plans
 
fl
,
.
.
.
~
;
t
l
n
I
If
II
"If
1
r
~-T
I'
'j
I
]r
IJ
'1[
!
I
U
,
.
I~
!
I
_
r:
i!
I
II
I!
I:
~_J
!
I
,I
I!
~
I
i'.
INTHEMISSOURICO·tJRTOF
AP'PEALS
EASTERNDISTRICT
BONZELLASMITH,
etal
))
)
)AppealNo.ED95733
)
)
))
Respondents
vs.
TIFCOMMISSIONERS,
etal.;
Appellants.
Appeal
fromtheCircuitCourt
ofSt.
LouisCity,Missouri
CaseNo.{)922~CC9379
Hon.RobertH.Dierker,Jr.Division18
REPLYBRIEFANDRESPONSEBRIEFONCROSSAPPEALOFAPPELLANTNORTHSIDEREGENERATION~LLC(INTERVENORSNELSONANDMCINTOSH)
Paul
J,
Puricelli,#32801
Robb
E.
Hellwig,#60570Stone,Leyton
&
Gershman,
AProfessionalCorporation7733ForsythBlvd.,
Suite
500
81.
Louis,
Missouri63105
(314)721-7011
(314)721-8660
pjp@Sto?-eleytoll.comrhellwig@stoneleyton.com
-
AttorneysforAppellantNorthsideRegeneration,LLC
 
TABLEOFCONTENTS
TABLEOFAUTHORITIES,,.,',,,,,4
REPLYBRIEF
MOTIONTOSTRlKEFORFAILURETO
C01vIPLYWITHRULE84,046JURISDICTIONAL
STA'fE1v1ENT..,..,.,,.,,".,,.,..9
STATEMENTOFFACTS,',.,,"12ARGUMENT
PointI..;.
to,".."••
t..
1'•;.."~~
4-
4.I.
t
t.."""t"t
r
23
I.THETRIAL-COURTERREDINRULINGTHATTHEREDEVELOPMENTORDINANCESLACKEDAREDEVELOPMENT
:
~
,
PROJECTANDTHUSDIDNOTSATISFYTHETIFACTBECAUSERESPONDENTSWAIVEDANDFAILEDTOPRESERVEANYSUCHCHALLENGEINTHAT
RESPONDENTS
FAILEDTORAISEANY
LEGAL
ORFACTUALCHALLENGEBASEDUPONTHELACKORSUFFICIENCYOFAREDEVELOPMENTPROJECTINTHEIRPLEADINGSORATTRIAL.
Point11,
+..
t.."t..;.
I
'1""'''''''''
I
t
I"•.,.,"~I"I~
t".
-.I.~
t~
",27
II.THETRIALCOURTERREDINRULINGTHATTHEREDEVELOPMENTORDINANCESLACKEDAREDEVELOPMENTPROJECTANDTHEREFOREDIDNOTSATISFYTHETIFACTBECAUSETHETRIALCOURT'SNEWDEFINITIONOFA
REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
AS~'A
SPECIFIC
PLANOR
DESIGN"
IS
1
 
CONTRARYTOTHEBROADDEFINlTIONOF
REDEVELOPM:ENT
PROJECTUNDER,ANDTHEINTENTOFSECTION99.805(14)OFTHETIFACTINTHATTHETIFACTREQUIRESONLY"ANYDEVELOPMENTPROJECT"ANDTHEREDEVELOPMENTORDINANCESINCLUDED
A
REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECTWITHIN
THEMEANINGOFTHETIFACT.
Point
ill
I
a
III
4-~..
t
r~..~
4••
f..-
t..-.
iIiI;.
'II
II•II
-•
II
+'"
I,.•
45
ID.THETIDAL
COURTERREDINRULINGTHATTHEREDEVELOPMENTORDINANCESDIDNOTSATISFYTHETIFACTBECAUSETHEORDINANCESLACKEDACOST-BENEFITANALYSISREFERABLETOASPECIFICPROJECTBECAUSETHETIFACTDOESNOTREQUIREACOSTBENEFITANALYSISINCQNNECTIONWITH.INDIVIDUALREDEVELOPMENTPROJECTS;RATHER,RSMo§99.810.1(5)REQUIRESACOST-BENEFITANALYSISOFTHEREDEVELOPMENTPLANASAWHOLEANDTHEREDEVELOPlVIENTORDINANCESSATISFIED
THE
TIFACTINTHATTHEYINCLUDEDACOSTBENEFITANALYSISOFTHEPLANASAWHOLE.
2
Search
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
    • Notes
    Load more