Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
USDC EDV a Motion for Legal Level Playing Field

USDC EDV a Motion for Legal Level Playing Field

Ratings: (0)|Views: 89|Likes:
Unfair Advantage Arlington Attorneys
Unfair Advantage Arlington Attorneys

More info:

Published by: James Renwick Manship, Sr. on Feb 01, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/01/2012

pdf

text

original

 
A.O., a child of 12
, and other minors,
by Manship, Next Friend
, and othersIndividually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,Next Friend Manship files
Pro Se
, and as Disabled Veteran,
 In Forma Pauperis
Plaintiffs,
v.ARLINGTON COUNTYSherri Brothers
, Karen Grane, Jason McCandless, George Varoutsos, et alDefendants.1.
Plaintiff in his 19 Dec. 2011brought to the Court’s attention the Massachusetts District Court's opinion in
Connor et. al. vPatrick,
 
C.A. No. 10-cv-30073-MAP
(2011), DENYING the Government’s Motion to Dismiss.
2. This was provided to Next Friend Manship by a non-Virginia Bar Civil Rights attorney withaccess to PACER, that as
 Pro Se
and
 In Forma Pauperis
, Next Friend Plaintiff Manship does nothave and can not afford to pay for access to PACER, even if authorized, so is disadvantaged inhis efforts to assist the minor children. The “assistance of counsel” attorney also sent the Docketfor the case against Massachusetts CPS, or its equivalent, filed by the Child Welfare Leaguelawyers, and one order where the Massachusetts Defendants Motions to Dismiss were DENIED.3. WHY do I repeat words from my last pleading DATED: 19 December 
anno domini
2011? Read on...4. In Court when a Bar member attorney at law in argument presents a ruling alleged to berelevant, the lawyer is expected to provide a copy to both the judge and the opposing counsel, sothat in an instant the opposing counsel can “read and comprehend” the case sufficient to pose anOBJECTION where not relevant. Likewise the judge may question the relevance. The Arlingtonattorneys have FAILED to provide to this
 Pro Se, IFP 
“Counsel” copies of the MANY citations,and the same is true for the clerks to the magistrate judge, both who have taxpayer paid legalresearch resources the Plaintiff lacks.
IFP Plaintiff moves ALL cases cited by opposing counselor judicial clerks be provided in their entirety on a CD (compact disk) in PDF format for fairness.
IFP PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EQUAL JUSTICE by LEVEL PLAYING FIELDwith TAXPAYER PAID LAWYERS’ LEGAL RESEARCH RESOURCES
 
p. 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THEEASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIAAlexandria Division
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
Case No:1: 11CV1003JCC/JFA
IFP PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EQUAL JUSTICE by LEVEL PLAYING FIELDwith TAXPAYER PAID LAWYERS’ LEGAL RESEARCH RESOURCES
 
5. Corresponding to this Motion for Equal Justice by Level Playing Field... between a singleCitizen plaintiff, disabled Veteran filing
 In Forma Pauperis
, and so recognized as
 IFP 
by Order of this Court, this
 IFP 
Plaintiff moves the Court to advance the cause of Equal Justice by“leveling the playing field”, so that taxpayer monies are not giving the government of Arlingtonan unfair advantage over Citizens engaged in litigation to stop abusive actions by Arlington.6. Plaintiff moves for the Court to Order the Arlington County Office of County Attorney, whotheoretically “serve the people” (not serve to advance its own bureaucratic “empires”), to providea code for access to both PACER and other legal research services available in their offices, suchas Nexis/Lexis, or WestLaw, or other legal research services this non-Bar member attorney infact is not yet aware exists in their offices, so to “level the playing field” and truly advance the potential for “Equal Justice Under the Law” and “Equal Justice for All” (NOT “more Equal Justicefor members of the Bar = unequal justice, or “even more Equal Justice for taxpayer paid Bar lawyers” = very much unequal justice.)
If this Court truly honors Equal Justice, this is mandatory.
7. Plaintiff moves the Court for a Continuance until 14 days after the opposing counsel provide both the CD of cases cited in their Sanctions pleading, and
provide a code for access to OUR legal research resources, so there can be created some semblance of Equal Justice for All.
Respectfully submitted by: __________________________ James Renwick Manship, Sr. , J.D.*J.D.* = Jesus DiscipleJesus = Advocate, Mediator, Counselor Chaplain, Legal Historian ** Next Friend, Lead Plaintiff,
 Pro Se
, and
 In Forma Pauperis,
Virginia Code “Attorney in fact”Amos 5:15 Project:
“Hate evil and love the good. Remodel your Courts into True Halls of Justice.”
God and Country Foundation, Box 76, Mount Vernon, Virginia 22121-0076,Phone: 703-672-1776 Facsimile: 703-638-1146
IFP PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EQUAL JUSTICE by LEVEL PLAYING FIELDwith TAXPAYER PAID LAWYERS’ LEGAL RESEARCH RESOURCES
 
p. 2
** “In New England, the clergy for along time maintained a completesupremacy in the magistracy and inthe courts… The clergy possessed,as in England, much of the legalknowledge of the community.” p. 7,
A History of the American Bar
,Chapter 1 “Law without Lawyers”.
** from Harvard Library

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->