3. Taken together with a number of other unlicensed economic operators, which inour view are Serbian Publicly Owned Enterprises (POEs) and Serbian Governmentsupplied public services ranging
from
health and education to fiscal and generalgovernance that already operate in Kosovo, this represents a formal challenge toUNMIK's authority to implement fully SCR 1244. Virtually all
of
the above entities,
and
institutions
of
the Government
of
Serbia, have been informed on numerousoccasions in meetings and in writing, that such operations are illegal and that anyundertaki.ngs operating in Kosovo must comply fully with the applicable law inKosovo. None
of
these approaches has produced any tangible effect,
a'ltd
newconstruction projects continue
to
be launched.
4.
Accelerating partition prejudices ongoing political developments by creating a
fait accompli
where the K-Serbian-inhabited areas
of
Kosovo are both separated fromthe rest
of
Kosovo and made increasingly reliant on Belgrade. At the current pace,areas inhabited by K-Serbs will soon
be
capable
of
consuming basic utilities provideddirectly from Serbia without any communication with the rest
of
Kosovo or anyrespect for Kosovo's laws and regulations.
5.
•
This will further hamper the Mission's and the' central PISG's ability to offerKosovo-based perspectives to Kosovo Serbs.
6.
Until now, UNMIK has been very cautious about encouraging executive actionagainst service providers
in
Kosovo Serbian-inhabited areas, in order to maintainstability
of
services and political calm during the process
of
status negotiations
..
However, it
s e ~ m s
that some Serbian companies and institutions have misinterpretedthis position as a sign
of
leniency or even indifference to the expansion
of
theiroperations.
..
.
,.
7.
To prevent further deterioration
of
both theJactual and the political situation onthe ground, as well as to avoid prejudicing political developments in the statusprocess,. UNMIK believes that effective
~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ? ; ! i ' s h o u l d
be taken against the offending
:,;;.,
compames.
8.
Moreover, UNMIK believes that in the spirit
of
the
SG's
call for the Troika
to
take a more pro-active role in the current round
of
status talks, UN Headquartersshould
calion
the Troika and Contact Group members to take the matter up directlywith the authorities in Belgrade by requesting that they ensure that Serbian publicinstitutions and companies cease and desist from engaging in any activities thattmderrnine implementation
of
SCR 1244 including the ongoing efforts in the statusprocess.
9.
Your comments and guidance would be highly appreciated.Best regards.
.
.....
,
'4
. ~ .
,
.....
~ _ " k ! l ! $ " I " ' . " " l I I "
,"",
.......
.•
IIi;."!I'\"'''''
..
:.,
lIIallll.'
•.
1S1S_::e"'.'II¥l!4l1'-I
'0'.'
,tee
"lbl
d )
f
tt'
••
'
t
Ui
l'
.,.
Add a Comment