judge speaks: the new scheme political accountability replaced with judicial accountabilityshe has a lovely voice---the only woman on the court montgomery:arrest and surrender executionwhat is requiredfundamental rights judicial intervention judicial means one thing at one timeits axiomatic (nihilists for nothing) different situationaxiomatic in the framework article 5,4 rights---these are what MP dominic raab and cameron are against---!!!! if we exceeded this appeal---second from right speaks---take 1957 convention---how many actually ratified and appplied---nationals---sensitive----it mightwell benot present in the convention montgomery:in number of states party----38 states---2001we have in the electronic number----thirty left---in relation to those---there were significantnumbers---nationals---in relation---the position altered.there were similar schemes in relation to EU 95, 96the simplified schemes that existed req. all states to limit 5 years nationals---parties to besimplified---the exlusion of the political--- (in sweden highly political bribes-lobby--conflict of interest---)under article 95 extradition under shengen information systemyou cant simply saythe position had moved on considerablyby the time the framework decision direct contact without reservatiosn---without the involvementand with involvement of policethe extradition act article 95---shengen requests---were specifically to be regarded as . . .for a transitional period---even though they came from police----(not good) habitual simple scheme---request by public prosecutors----why the nords are so simple---why.