P a g e 6
On the other hand, respondents: a)
HONORABLEEXECUTIVE SECRETARY
EDUARDO R. ERMITA
, is being sued inhis capacity as Executive Secretary and as implementor of Republic Act No. 9495. He may be served with writs, summons,pleadings, orders, decision and other court processes at his officeat Room 234, Mabini Hall, Malacañang Palace, Manila; b)
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET ANDMANAGEMENT
, is of legal age, married, with principal officeaddress at Department of Budget and Management, MalacañangPalace, Manila; c)
COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS
holds office atIntramuros, Manila, where all of them, in their indicatedrespective principal offices, may be served with summons, writsand other processes of this Honorable Court.
IINATURE OF THE PETITION
This is a
Petition for Certiorari
under
Rule 65
to declare theunconstitutionality of Republic Act No. 9495, and COMELECResolutions Nos. 8533, 8534, 8535, 8537, 8538 and 8539, alldated November 12, 2008; This is also a special civil action for
Prohibition
to enjoin,forbid, and prohibit the above-named respondents fromimplementing, enforcing, and effecting Republic Act No. 9495 andthe questioned COMELEC Resolutions, particularly:
Add a Comment