Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
mesa state's option attack

mesa state's option attack

Ratings: (0)|Views: 153 |Likes:
Published by Michael Schearer

More info:

Published by: Michael Schearer on Nov 16, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/09/2014

pdf

text

original

On behalf of the Mesa State College

coaching staff and football team, I would like to thank the American Football Coaches Association for allowing us to be a part of theAFCA Summer Manual. It is a great honor to be associated with such a fine organization. We have grown consid- erably as a team and a coaching staff from the many articles featured in the AFCA manuals.

In 1980, I was fortunate to have the opportunity to play for Pat Dye at the University of Wyoming. Al Kincaid was the offensive coordinator for the Cowboys and the next year took over as head coach. These great coaches and their triple option attacks have had an influence on me ever since then. I believe in and have enjoyed using the triple option both as a player and a coach.

It is as a coach that I have grown to truly appreciate the capabilities of option offense. While coaching at the high school level I spent a lot of time with the Air Force Academy staff. Coach Ken Hatfield and especially Coach Fisher DeBerry and their staffs\u2019 philosophies have been instrumen- tal in developing our option attack. A t Mesa State we have improved every year with the option game. In my first season in 1998 we finished the season 5-6, which was the most wins in five years. In 1999 we finished 6-5, which was the first win- ning season since 1990. The offense fin- ished seventh in the nation in rushing o ffense. The 2000 season was even better and included a 10-3 finish along with a conference championship and the first conference win in the Division II playoffs. Offensively we finished fourth in the nation in rushing offense and ninth in the nation in total offense. The credit belongs to the players who have worked hard every day and believed in the system and what we are trying to accomplish. We are continu- ing to model our program after the AFA and especially try to instill the discipline and teamwork that they have. Darin Robidoux, Pete Cyphers, and I coordinate the offensive package together. We have nine different option series, three of which we will discuss in this article. The three phases, which will be discussed, are the inside veer, counter lead, and lead option series. All phases of our offense hinge off of the option game.

Our offensive philosophy is as follows:
1.No less than four yards a play.
2.100 percent ball security
3.Win time of possession.
4.Finish

The base of our offensive attack begins with the inside veer. The option play has designed alternatives (fullback-dive, quar- terback-keep, halfback-pitch) that enable the offense to threaten across a broad front. The option play is best when it uses the entire width of the field. The synchro- nized reaction of the play to defensive movement destroys team recognition and makes the defense play responsibilities rather than team pursuit. Our strategy changes responsibilities by using alternate plays, blocking schemes, and formations that control defensive movement.

The option alternatives must be syn- chronized so that maximum separation can be obtained. The option premise is that no one defender can defend two threats. The pivot point of the play is the course of the fullback, or what we call the crease. The area from the crease to the sideline is the potential width of the play or what we call the perimeter. We try to attack this area with speed and create a bad angle for the defense.

Because the same play can be run to both sides, the inside veer requires five defenders in the perimeter to both sides to stop the play. This creates a numbers advantage that the defense can only neu- tralize by getting an extra man in the perimeter.

The philosophy of the triple option is to try to deceive the opponent as well as have the ability to let three different people carry the ball. It also allows the offense the free- dom to not block a dominating defensive player. We emphasize this point because we do not have the luxury to recruit just any player. We have to try to get players that want to come to Mesa State that fit our sys- tem and team approach.

There are two basic fronts you can have, an eight-man front and a seven-man front. The eight-man front will most likely consist of no middle linebacker and no nose guard. The seven-man front will usu- ally have a middle linebacker and no nose guard or a nose guard and no middle line- backer. (Diagram 1A & 1B).

The read key is the first man outside the offensive guard, or outside the B gap. The read key will always be on the line of scrim- mage, and he is the defender who is to be optioned for the dive aspect of the offense. Usually four things can happen on the read area:

\u2022
AFCA Sum m er M anual
\u2014
2 0 0 1
\u2022
Joe Ramunno
Head Coach
Mesa State College
Grand Junction, Colo.
Run with the Mavericks:
Mesa State\u2019s Option Attack

1.Mesh Charge (Diagram 2)
2.Squat (Diagram 3)
3.Upfield (Diagram 4)
4.Q Stunt (Diagram 5)

The quarterback wants to key the inside pad of the read key. The fullback will have his hand at six feet from the quarterback\u2019s heels. He will take a six inch step at the guard, soft squeeze the football and feel

the hand of the quarterback leave the
stomach to know to take the ball.

If the quarterback does not give the ball to the fullback, he will attack the inside leg of the pitch key, which is the next man out- side the read key. The pitch key can be on or off of the line of scrimmage. The pitch key can do four things:

1. Sink (Diagram 6)
2. Slow Play (Diagram 7)
3. Upfield (Diagram 8)
4. Hot (Diagram 9)

The following drawings will show how the inside veer is blocked against the seven and eight man fronts (Diagrams 10 & 11).

The counter lead option is part of our double option series. This play is intended to get to the perimeter and stretch the

defense horizontally, as well as take pres- sure off the quarterback. On this play we want to attack the perimeter and pitch off the corner. The success of the play depends on the block of the tackle. He must get his reach block for the play to be effective, or the defense can stretch the play to the sideline.

The quarterback\u2019s action is to reverse out and press the outside. We still want to attack the inside leg of the pitch key and make him commit. The pitch key can slow play or be hot. This makes it easy for the quarterback and allows him to be more aggressive. Diagram 12 will show the counter lead option against the eight-man front.

Our lead option is part of our double
option series with full reach blocking up
\u2022
AFCA Sum m er M anual
\u2014
2 0 0 1
\u2022
Diagram 1A
Diagram 1B
Diagr am 2
Diagr am 3
Diagr am 4
Diagr am 5
Diagr am 6
Diagr am 7
Diagr am 8
Diagr am 9
Diagram 10
Diagram 11
Diagram 12

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->