Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗ ΧΑΓΗΣ ΓΙΑ ΔΙΣΤΟΜΟ

ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗ ΧΑΓΗΣ ΓΙΑ ΔΙΣΤΟΜΟ

Ratings: (0)|Views: 17 |Likes:

More info:

Published by: Γιάννης Χαραλαμπίδης on Feb 03, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/27/2013

pdf

text

original

 
3 FÉVRIER 2012ARRÊTIMMUNITÉS JURIDICTIONNELLES DE L’ÉTAT (ALLEMAGNE c. ITALIE ;GRÈCE (INTERVENANT))
___________
JURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITIES OF THE STATE (GERMANY
v.
ITALY:GREECE INTERVENING)3 FEBRUARY 2012JUDGMENT
 
T
ABLE OF
C
ONTENTS
 
Paragraphs
C
HRONOLOGY OF THE PROCEDURE
1-19I. H
ISTORICAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
20-361. The Peace Treaty of 1947 222. The Federal Compensation Law of 1953 233. The 1961 Agreements 24-254. Law establishing the “Remembrance, Responsibility and Future”Foundation 265. Proceedings before Italian courts 27-36A. Cases involving Italian nationals 27-29B. Cases involving Greek nationals 30-36II. T
HE SUBJECT
-
MATTER OF THE DISPUTE AND THE JURISDICTION OF THE
C
OURT
37-51III. A
LLEGED VIOLATION OF
G
ERMANY
S JURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITY INTHE PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT BY THE
I
TALIAN CLAIMANTS
52-1081. The issues before the Court 52-612. Italy’s first argument: the territorial tort principle 62-793. Italy’s second argument: the subject-matter and circumstances of the claims in the Italian courts 80-106A. The gravity of the violations 81-91B. The relationship between
 jus cogens
and the rule of Stateimmunity 92-97C. The “last resort” argument 98-104D. The combined effect of the circumstances relied upon byItaly 105-1064. Conclusions 107-108IV. T
HE MEASURES OF CONSTRAINT TAKEN AGAINST PROPERTYBELONGING TO
G
ERMANY LOCATED ON
I
TALIAN TERRITORY
109-120V. T
HE DECISIONS OF THE
I
TALIAN COURTS DECLARING ENFORCEABLE IN
I
TALY DECISIONS OF
G
REEK COURTS UPHOLDING CIVIL CLAIMSAGAINST
G
ERMANY
121-133VI. G
ERMANY
S FINAL SUBMISSIONS AND THE REMEDIES SOUGHT
134-138O
PERATIVE CLAUSE
139___________
 
 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICEYEAR 201220123 FebruaryGeneral ListNo. 1433 February 2012JURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITIES OF THE STATE(GERMANY
v.
ITALY: GREECE INTERVENING)
 Historical and factual background.Peace Treaty of 1947 
⎯ 
Federal Compensation Law of 1953
⎯ 
1961 Agreements
⎯ 
 2000 Federal Law establishing the “Remembrance, Responsibility and Future
Foundation
⎯ 
 Proceedings before Italian courts
⎯ 
Cases involving Italian nationals
⎯ 
Cases involving Greek nationals.
*
Subject-matter of dispute and jurisdiction of the Court.Subject-matter of dispute delimited by claims of Germany and Italy
⎯ 
No objection to jurisdiction of the Court or admissibility of Application raised by Italy
⎯ 
Article 1 of the EuropeanConvention for the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes as basis of jurisdiction
⎯ 
Limitation
rationetemporis
not applicable
⎯ 
The Court has jurisdiction
⎯ 
The Court is not called upon to rule onquestions of reparation
⎯ 
Relationship between duty of reparation and State immunity
⎯ 
No other question with regard to the Court’s jurisdiction.
*

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->