Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Request for Re-Hearing In Obama Illinois Challenge

Request for Re-Hearing In Obama Illinois Challenge

Ratings: (0)|Views: 572 |Likes:
Published by Pamela Barnett
Request for rehearing of Obama ballot challenge because Objector's evidence was excluded from the public record.
Request for rehearing of Obama ballot challenge because Objector's evidence was excluded from the public record.

More info:

Published by: Pamela Barnett on Feb 06, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/14/2012

pdf

text

original

 
BEFORE THE DULY CONSTITUTED ELECTORAL BOARDFOR THE HEARING OF AND PASSING UPON OBJECTIONS TOTHE NOMINATION PAPERS FOR CANDIDATES FOR THE OFFICE OFPRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
IN THE MATTER OF THE OBJECTIONS OF )MICHAEL JACKSON )TO THE NOMINATION PAPERS OF BARACK ) 12SOEBGP104OBAMA AS A CANDIDATE FOR THE NOMINATION )TO THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED )STATES TO BE VOTED UPON AT THE )MARCH 20, 2012 ELECTIONS. )
OBJECTOR’S EXCEPTION TO
RECOMMENDATIONOF THE ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS DATE 2/2/12, AN IMMEDIATE RE-
HEARING OF OBJECTOR’S CASE IS WARRANTED BECAUSE OBJECTOR’S TIMELY
SUBMITTED EVIDENCE WAS LEFT OUT OF THE PUBLIC RECORD FORCONSIDERATION BY THE BOARD
NOW COMES Objector Michael Jackson, self-represented, and moves to takeException to Illinois Stat
e Board of Election’s Recommendation dated February 2,
2012.Regarding RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD TO DISMISS OBJECTION underthe
RULES OF PROCEDURE -ADOPTED BY THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONSSITTINGAS THE DULY CONSTITUTED STATE OFFICERS ELECTORAL BOARDFOR THE HEARING AND PASSING UPON OBJECTIONS TONOMINATING PAPERS SEEKING TOPLACE ESTABLISHED POLITICAL PARTY CANDIDATES ON THE BALLOT FOR THE MARCH 20, 2012 PRIMARY ELECTION (*,**)
, Objector takes EXCEPTION to thefollowing:1.
 
OBJECTOR CONTESTS
BOARD’S
ACTION OF HIDING FROM THE PUBLIC
RECORD THE OBJECTOR’S HEARING EXAMINER EXCEPTION DATED
 
1/31/12 AND OBJECTOR’S NATURAL BORN LAW MEMORANDUM AMICUS
BRIEF THAT PROVES BARACK OBAMA IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
 During the hearing conducted Feb. 2, 2012 on the Objection, Objectorrequested to speak before the Board, but he was denied. Regardless of whether the timely submitted aforementioned Exhibit and Exception to the
Hearing Examiner’s Recommendation to Board were erroneously excluded
or spoliated from the Illinois Public Record, an immediate emergencyrehearing on the evidence submitted by the Objector is warranted
 
by theboard.
Candidate Obama’s attorney argued and
the Board appears to erroneouslybelieve that dicta from an Indiana Appellate Court case (Anekey v.Governor of Indiana 916 N.E. 2d 678 (In. App. 2009)) overrides the U.S.Supreme Court precedent Minor v. Happersett on the definition of NaturalBorn Citizen.
Candidate Obama is a Constitutionally ineligible candidate for Presidentand he cannot possibly have valid nomination papers, because anynominating petition signed would be fraudulent on its face.The Illinois State Election Board has been duly informed of Candidate
Obama’s U.S. Constitutional ineligibility under Article II, Section 1, Clause
5, of the U.S. Constitution.If the Board allows Candidate Obama on the ballot, they commit massivefraud against the citizens of the state of Illinois.Respectfully Submitted,s//Michael Jackson ______________________________Michael Jackson, OBJECTOR
 
2/3/2012*
 
In cases where a hearing examiner is appointed, the Board shall not issue a finaldecision until a proposal for decision submitted by the Hearing Examiner is servedupon the parties and
an opportunity is afforded each party to take exceptions
,whether written or oral, and, if the Board so permits, oral argument before theBoard. The Board will make a final ruling on the objection and
 
may consider thefollowing as part of its consideration and appraisal of the record: the petition andthe objection thereto, the hearing transcript, the hearing examiner's outline,recommendations and
 
proposal for decision, and any exceptions, briefs, exhibits,offers of proof or arguments presented by the parties.**
 
The Chairman shall make all necessaryevidentiary rulings, subject to appeal to the entire Board. Where a hearingexaminer has been appointed, he or she will receive all evidence and makeall evidentiary rulings, subject to review bythe entire Board. The Board will not retry issues heard by a hearingexaminer unless the hearing examiner has excluded evidence the Boardbelieves should have been admitted.
In such cases the Board will hear theexcluded evidence and such other evidence as may be appropriate inresponse to the matter excluded.
The Board will not hear evidence thatcould have been but was not presented to the hearing examiner, nor willthe Board consider objections that could have been, but were not raised inthe original objection.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->