Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this

Table Of Contents

0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Duran v. United States Bank

Duran v. United States Bank

Ratings: (0)|Views: 85|Likes:
Published by www.BaileyDaily.com

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: www.BaileyDaily.com on Feb 07, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Filed 2/6/12
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIAFIRST APPELLATE DISTRICTDIVISION ONESAM DURAN et al,Plaintiffs and Respondents,v.U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,Defendant and Appellant.A125557 & A126827(Alameda CountySuper. Ct. No. 2001-035537)Following a bifurcated bench trial, defendant U.S. Bank National Association(USB) has appealed the resulting $15 million judgment in this wage and hour class actionbrought under Business and Professions Code section 17200 (section 17200). Theplaintiffs in the class action are 260 current and former business banking officers
(BBO‘s) who claimed they were misclassified by USB as outside sales personnel exemptfrom California‘s overtime
laws, and were thus unlawfully denied overtime pay. Inaddition to arguing the case should not have been certified as a class action, USB
contends the trial court‘s trial management plan deprived it of its constitutional due
process rights in that the plan prevented it from defending against the individual claimsfor over 90 percent of the class. We agree the trial management plan was fatally flawedand reverse the judgment. We also conclude the case must be decertified, and reverse anorder awarding certain expert witness fees to plaintiffs.
We remand the two named
 plaintiffs‘ meal and rest break period violation claims for reconsideration in light of the
The two consolidated appeals are from the judgment after court trial (A125557) and from an
award of expert witness fees with respect to plaintiffs‘ expert witness Miles Locker (A1268
California Supreme Court‘s ruling in
 Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court 
(2008)165 Cal.App.4th 25, review granted October 22, 2008 (S166350).
In January 2005, when plaintiffs moved to certify this case as a class action, USBreportedly operated over 130 traditional bank branches in California with approximately40 persons
then currently employed as BBO‘s. Each BBO was typically assigned towork with one to four bank branches. BBO‘s report to sales managers who in turn report
to regional managers. Regional managers report to a division manager who then reportsto the executive vice president.
USB applies a uniform wage exemption to BBO‘s, categorizing them as exempt
outside salespersons to whom USB is not obligated to pay overtime and related wages.
 The outside salesperson exemption is set forth in Labor Code section 1171, which states:
―The provisions of this chapter [including Labor Code section 1194]
shall apply to andinclude men, women and minors employed in any occupation, trade, or industry, whethercompensation is measured by time, piece, or otherwise, but shall not include anyindividual employed as an outside salesman . . .
.‖ California Industrial Wage
Commission Wage Order No. 4-2001 (Wage Order No. 4) (codified at Cal. Code Regs.,
tit. 8, § 11040) defines an ―outside salesperson‖ as a person ―who
customarily and 
regularly works more than half the working time away from the employer’s place of 
selling tangible or intangible items or obtaining orders or contracts for products,
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 8, 2011. A decision should issue shortlyafter this opinion is filed.
California employees are generally entitled to overtime pay for work of more than eight hours aday and 40 hours per week. (See, e.g., Lab. Code, § 510; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11040 et seq.)There are, however, several classes of employees who are exempt from overtime laws, such asoutside salespersons.
Labor Code section 1194, subdivision (a), authorizes an employee who received less than theapplicable legal minimum wage or overtime compensation to seek recovery from his or heremployer.
services or use of facilities.‖
(Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11040, subd. 2(M), italicsadded.)The BBO classification was created after USB merged with another bank in 2001,when an existing small business banker (SBB) position was redesignated with the BBO
title. A May 1997 job description states that SBB‘s were responsible for ―developing and
managing small business banking customer relationships by advising on and selling awide range of financial services to include: credit, deposit, cash management and other
applicable bank products and services.‖ Persons in this c
lassification were also
responsible for ―growing the business through prospecting, networking, cross
-selling and
relationship management in order to develop and expand the relations with [USB].‖SBB‘s were encouraged to ―build strong customer relationship
s and analyze data to
determine the customer‘s business needs and financial condition.‖ This job description
was essentially retained when the BBO position was created in 2001.
However, a 2002 job description specifies that more than 80 percent of a BBO
‘s time should be spent on―Outside Sales Activity.‖
Of the five functions listed in the job description under thisheading, several are required to take place outside branch offices.
 I. The Complaint
On December 26, 2001, Amina Rafiqzada, acting on behalf of herself and othersimilarly situated current and former USB employees,
filed a class action complaint
While Labor Code section 1171 uses the term ―outside salesman,‖ the regulation that is the
primary focus of this opinion uses the
term ―outside salesperson.‖ For the sake of consistency,we will use the term ―outside salesperson.‖
For convenience, this opinion will use the BBO abbreviation to refer to both SBB‘s and BBO‘s,
with exceptions made in reference to individual plaintiffs.
USB does not maintain any documents showing the daily or weekly hours worked by BBO‘s.
For example, BBO‘s are expected to consult with customers and prospects at their place o business ―in order to understand their current business practices and
identify their financial goals
and needs.‖ BBO‘s are also expected to represent the bank at various civic and community
functions, and to conduct joint outside sales calls with other branch employees at potential
customers‘ places of business.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->