Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Newer Coram Nobis Aug 24 2011 Winona

Newer Coram Nobis Aug 24 2011 Winona

Ratings: (0)|Views: 135|Likes:
Published by winona mae marzocco

More info:

Published by: winona mae marzocco on Feb 08, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/08/2012

pdf

text

original

 
IN THE COURT OFFAMILY COURT SUFFOLK COUNTYTHE STATE OF NEW YORK CASE # V-17642-09FICTITIOUS FOREIGN STATE V-17639-09P-16952-09N-16863-09VsJUDGE JAMES F.QUINNWinona Mae : Palmiotti
_____________________________ 
Non corporate entityCONTEMPT OF CONSTITUTION ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE; NATURE ANDCAUSE OF WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS & A DEMAND FOR DISMISSALFOR LACK OF JUDICIAL, SUBJECT MATTER AND PERSONALJURISDICTION
 Now comes Winona Mae : Palmiotti a non corporate entity with a
CONTEMPTOF CONSTITUTION ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE; NATURE AND CAUSE OFWRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS & A DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JUDICIAL, SUBJECT MATTER AND PERSONAL JURISDICTION
The Petitioner objects to the plaintiff filing into the Court and object to any judgment for it lack Judicial, Subject Matter and Personal jurisdiction pursuant to 12 (b) (1), (2) and12 (b) (6) failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and Pursuant theEleventh Amendment, The Reconstruction Act of 1867 -1868 and to FRCP Rule 4 (j)
 
1. This Court is defined under FRCP Rule 4 (j) as a FOREIGN STATE as definedunder 28 JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE under USC 1602 -1611FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY ACT (FSIA) is being jurisdictionally challengeand full disclosure of the true jurisdiction of this Court is now being demand.Any failure to disclose the true jurisdiction is a violation of 
15 Statutes at Large,Chapter 249 (section 1), enacted July 27 1868
Chap. CCXLIX. ---An Act concerning the Rights of American Citizens in foreign StatesWhereas the rights of expatriation is a nature and inherent right of all people,indispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness;and whereas in the recognition of this principle this government has freely receivedemigrants from all nations, and invested them with the right of citizenship; and whereasit is claimed that such American citizens, with their descendants, are subjects of foreignstates, owing allegiance to the government thereof; and whereas it is necessary to themaintenance of public peace that this claim of foreign allegiance should be promptlyand finally disavowed; Thereof.Be it enacted by the Senator and the House of Representatives of the UnitedStates of American in Congress assembled, That any declaration, instruction, opinion,order, or decision, of any officers of is government which denies., restricts , impairs or questions the rights of expatriation , is hereby declared inconsistent with the fundamental principles of this government.2.Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and civil Rule of Procedure 8(a)and 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2) and (12(b)(6) the State of NEW YORK , Defendant ,, respectfullymoves this Court to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendant based on: (1) a lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the Eleventh Amendment; (2) lack of personal jurisdiction over the Defendant because the Defendant is Citizen as defined in Article IIIsection 2 clause 1; of the Constitution (3) lack of standing; and (4) failure to state a claimupon which relief may be granted. Pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment to the UnitedStates Constitution, this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear suits in law or for moneydamages or in Controversies between the State and Citizen of the same State. Pursuant toFederal Rules of Civil Procedure and civil Rule of Procedure 4 (e) ,(f) improper service
 
to the defendant as the defendant is a Citizen protect by the 11
th
amendment. The Statefailed to state its complaint in this action.3. As an America Citizen I hold the inherent right of the 11
th
amendment. The judicial power shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity or 
(even incontroversies created by the state government or federal government),
commencedor prosecuted by a Foreign State. If this FOREIGN STATE is misusing the name of thisAmerica Citizen by placing it in all caps or misusing the last name or using the term“person” as a CORPORATION all complaints and suit against such CORPORATION fallunder the FSIA and the DEPT OF STATE OFFICES in Washington DC. DC now has to be notify pursuant to 22 CFR 93.1 -93.2. A copy of the FSIA has to be filed with thecomplaint to the defendant’s chief executive officer of that CORPORATION.4. MUNICIPAL, COUNTY, OR STATE COURT lacks jurisdiction to hear anycase under the FOREIGN STATE definitions. This jurisdiction lies with the UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT COURT under the FSIA Statutes pursuant to 28 USC 1330.5. Because the Defendant is a non corporate entity and is not registered with anySecretary of State as a CORPORATION the Prosecution has
FAILED
to state a claim towhich relief can be granted under 12(b) (6). Therefore this matter 
 
must be dismissed for lack of political, persona, and subject matter jurisdiction, Venue and under the 11
th
amendment.6. The Petitioner will remind the Court and the Plaintiff of the EleventhAmendment of the Constitution .That Judicial Power of the United States Shall
NOT
beconstrued to extend to any suit in law or equity, ( This also means, even controversies brought in by the Plaintiff as this is in Article III section 2 clause 1 ) commenced or 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->