Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
12-02-07 Florida Patriots Speak Out Against Government Abuse _ Bob Hurt

12-02-07 Florida Patriots Speak Out Against Government Abuse _ Bob Hurt

Ratings: (0)|Views: 50|Likes:
Florida Patriots Speak Out Against Government Abuse
By Bob Hurt, 7 February 2012 - for immediate release and broad distribution
Foreword. If you want to “cut to the chase,” watch this two-hour uncut video of a patriot meeting and this one-hour video on loyalty oaths in Florida. Find this document at http://www.scribd.com/doc/80878142
ABC News Producer Dan Lieberman called me in mid-January 2012 to tell me he come to Florida the following week and wanted to interview. He had read articles I had written and posted to my blog and Lawmen group. I hadn’t known him as any particular news producer. I said “Sure.”
Dan came into my home and interviewed me on his small camera. He seemed interested in sovereign citizen. I told him I thought myself the wrong person, and he said he thought I was exactly the right person. I explained that I didn’t consider myself a member of any “sovereign citizen” group. Dan asked me to round up others willing to be interviewed.
Dan proceeded to ask me whether I believed any circumstances justify violence against government. I explained that violence means unlawful physical force, and that both the Constitution of Florida and the Declaration of Independence fully justify the use of physical force to “alter or abolish their form of government”.
Florida Patriots Speak Out Against Government Abuse
By Bob Hurt, 7 February 2012 - for immediate release and broad distribution
Foreword. If you want to “cut to the chase,” watch this two-hour uncut video of a patriot meeting and this one-hour video on loyalty oaths in Florida. Find this document at http://www.scribd.com/doc/80878142
ABC News Producer Dan Lieberman called me in mid-January 2012 to tell me he come to Florida the following week and wanted to interview. He had read articles I had written and posted to my blog and Lawmen group. I hadn’t known him as any particular news producer. I said “Sure.”
Dan came into my home and interviewed me on his small camera. He seemed interested in sovereign citizen. I told him I thought myself the wrong person, and he said he thought I was exactly the right person. I explained that I didn’t consider myself a member of any “sovereign citizen” group. Dan asked me to round up others willing to be interviewed.
Dan proceeded to ask me whether I believed any circumstances justify violence against government. I explained that violence means unlawful physical force, and that both the Constitution of Florida and the Declaration of Independence fully justify the use of physical force to “alter or abolish their form of government”.

More info:

Published by: Human Rights Alert, NGO on Feb 08, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/09/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 
Human Rights Alert 
2231 S Court, Palo Alto, CA 94301Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
 
Blog:
 Scribd: 
12-02-07 Florida Patriots Speak Out Against Government Abuse
Florida Patriots Speak Out Against Government Abuse
By Bob Hurt, 7 February 2012 - for immediate release and broad distribution
Foreword
. If you want to “cut to the chase,” watch thistwo-hour uncut videoof a patriot meeting and thisone-hour videoon loyalty oaths in Florida. Find this document athttp://www.scribd.com/doc/80878142  ABC News Producer Dan Lieberman called me in mid-January 2012 to tell me he come to Florida the following weekand wanted to interview. He had read articles I had written and posted to my blog and Lawmen group. I hadn’t knownhim as any particular news producer. I said “Sure.”Dan came into my home and interviewed me on his small camera. He seemed interested in sovereign citizen. I told himI thought myself the wrong person, and he said he thought I was exactly the right person. I explained that I didn’tconsider myself a member of any “sovereign citizen” group. Dan asked me to round up others willing to be interviewed.Dan proceeded to ask me whether I believed any circumstances justify violence against government. I explained thatviolence means unlawful physical force, and that both the Constitution of Florida and the Declaration of Independencefully justify the use of physical force to “alter or abolish their form of government”.
Florida Constitution of 1838
ARTICLE I.
 
 
Declaration of Rights.
 
That the great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized andestablished, we declare:Section 1. That all freemen, when they form a social compact, are equal; and have certaininherent and indefeasible rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life andliberty; of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property and reputation; and of pursuing their own happiness.Section 2. That all political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are foundedon their authority, and established for their benefit; and, therefore, they have, at all times, aninalienable and indefeasible right to alter or abolish their form of government, in such manner asthey may deem expedient.
Declaration of Independence of 4 July 1776, paragraph 2 
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from theconsent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, itis the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundationon such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effecttheir safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind aremore disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms towhich they are accustomed. But when a long train of 
 
abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the
 
Page 2/2 February 8, 2012
same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty,to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.  Such has beenthe patient sufferance of these collonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyrannyover these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world. [litany of abuses follows]
 
Let us see this matter clearly. Every government employee and registered voter swears anoath to support theConstitution.
US Constitution
Article II Section 1 Clause 8
 
 
Before he [the President] enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:  "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I willl faithfully execute the Office of President
 
of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitutionof the United States."
 
Article VI Clauses 2 and
3
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof;and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall bethe supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing inthe Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
 
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several StateLegislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the severalStates, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Testshall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
 
Florida ConstitutionArticle V Section 5.Public officers
.
 
Each state (b) and county officer, before entering upon the duties of the office, shall give bond as required by law, and shall swear or affirm:
 
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, protect, and defend the Constitution andGovernment of the United States and of the State of Florida; that I am duly qualified to hold officeunder the Constitution of the state; and that I will well and faithfully perform the duties of (title of office) on which I am now about to enter. So help me God.”,
 
Article VI Section 3.Oath
.Each eligible citizen upon registering shall subbscribe the following:“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will protect and defend the Constitution of the United Statesand the Constitution of the State of Florida, and that I am qualified to register as an elector under theConstitution and laws of the State of Florida.”
 
Florida StatutesPublic 876.05 employees; oath
.
 
 
Page 3/3 February 8, 2012
All (1) persons who now or hereafter are employed by or who now or hereafter are on the payroll of thestate, or any of its departments and agencies, subdivisions, counties, cities, school boards and districts of thefree public school system of the state or counties, or institutions of higher learning, except candidates for federal office, are required to take an oath before any person duly authorized to take acknowledgments of instruments for public record in the state in the following form:I, , a citizen of the State of Florida and of the United States of America, and being employed by or anofficer of and a recipient of public funds as such employee or officer, do hereby solemnly swear or affirm that I will support the Constitution of the United States and of the State of Florida.
 Voters and government employees must obey their oaths. That means they must enforce the constitutions’ restrictionson government power, and enforce the constitutions’ guarantees of rights of the people. Everything works well untilsome government employee commits crimes or abuses procedures. Such behaviors constitute torts against the peopleeven if one cannot measure the damage. Such behavior, when ignored or encouraged by other government employeesor voters becomes a “good old boys network” which operates outside government authority under color ofconstitutionality or color of law. I refer to such perpetrators of crime in government as “Gerps.” Gerps comprise andoperate the “good old boys network” in government that abuse the people and encroach on rights of the people throughgovernment excess.Ultimately, Gerps formulate a devious, clever color-of-law violation of the ideals of good government in the form of “publicpolicy.” Public Policy constitutes a form of treason against the Constitutions. It constitutes a betrayal of trust thatbreaches government’s obligation to retain constitutional structure, operate within constitutional restraints, and enforcethe guarantee of rights of the states and the people. “The People” have both the right and duty to put the governmentright back in its box by summarily terminating Gerp behavior or excising Gerps from government altogether withprejudice.Let us understand this clearly. The government itself is good. In a sense, it IS the Constitution’s spiritual presence. Thepeople IN government, who perform jobs in and for government, who swore oaths to support the constitutions, enforcethe structure of government and guarantee of rights IF they do their jobs. When they don’t do their jobs and begin actingunder color of law to do evil, iniquitous, or criminal things, thereby BEG the people to intervene. Intervention shouldconsist of correcting them or excising them from government. It’s that simple. And whoever first witnesses or detectsthe correct themAnyone with half a brain knows what it means when “the people” try to discontinue abuse by government perpetrators ofcrime. The Gerps respond with physical force and jail or kill their adversaries among “the People” who tried to effect theircorrection or excision. The people know this, so they try to use administrative, legal and political processes to effect thecorrection or excision of Gerps. In many cases, particularly in the cases of judges, legislators, county commissioners,sheriffs, IRS agents, governors, and presidents, that has become statistically impossible. When people face theimpasse typical of the American legal and political system, they naturally start thinking about their other options fordealing with Gerps: physical force.Physical force, even
strong 
physical force, differs from violence in the sense of reasonableness. Violence connotesunlawful or unreasonable, explosive use of physical force. The Revolutionary War became explosive, with each sideexerting strong force against the other. Our nation’s founders considered their use of physical force justified, and theviolent reaction of the British adversary unjustified. Their logic makes sense. You put up with abusive invasion of rights just so long and you reach a breaking point. Then you act to stop it. When gentle, reasoned actions have no effectexcept to increase the abuse, you resort to use of force, and if necessary violent and deadly force.We of good sense try to soften the terminology, but we simply cannot. We try to inject reason and patience into it, butwe can only do it to an extent, and then we must wash our hands of reason and embrace the cataclysm that follows theinjustice like night follows day. And, whether or not government employees and philosophers like it, the circumstancesof abuse or rights encroachments can fully justify a violent reaction. We have seen this dozens of times in the pastcentury in countries all over the world, including the USA.When reviewing them, we should take note that both the American Revolution and the War of Northern AggressionBOTH constituted CIVIL wars – wars against established authority that overstepped Constitutional authority and pushedthe abused to their breaking point. The Revolution ousted the Gerps. The War of Northern Aggression didn’t, in spite ofthe loss of over a million American lives.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->