utterly deprive the plaintiff of civil rights secured to her by the Constitution and laws of theUnited States, as well as those of the State of Connecticut, and by any notion of commonhuman decency. This conspiracy was so low, and so shadowy, and motivated by suchpetty ambitions as to resemble nothing so much as a sad, cruel parody of an organizedcrime family. In this case, armed with badges and authority, the conspirators took aim atthe plaintiff with the intent to punish her for her political affiliations and beliefs, and at thesame time to further their own political aspirations and designs on town control. Whentheir cancerous conspiracy came to light, they offered "protection" and favors. Theplaintiff, undeterred, would not be so deprived of her rights and she brings this actionseeking justice.
By way of the acts and omissions, policies and practices more fully described below,the defendants caused the False Arrest and Malicious Prosecution of the Plaintiff Erica
and said claims arise under the Fourth Amendment to the United StatesConstitution. The defendants also engaged in conduct that denied the plaintiff equalprotection of the laws as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, and retaliatedagainst the plaintiff for having exercised rights guaranteed to her under the FirstAmendment. In the manner described herein, the defendants deprived the plaintiff of herright to be free from false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, defamationand intentional infliction of emotional distress under the laws of the State of Connecticutwhich is invoked under the supplementary jurisdiction of this court.3. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under the provisions of
1343(3) and1367(a) of Title 28 and §§1983 and 1988 of Title 42 of the United States Code.