Democracy For Sale: Subverting Voting Rights, Collective Bargaining and Accountability Under Michigan's Emergency Manager Law, Final Report of U.S. House Judiciary Committee Democratic Staff, February 21, 2012
U.S. House Judiciary Committee Democratic Staff Report on the legal implications of Michigan’s Emergency Manager law. The Report represents the first comprehensive legal analysis of the Emergency Managers law since its adoption. Foremost among the Report’s detailed findings is the conclusion, based on expert testimony (including preeminent academic expert Professor Kenneth Klee) and legal precedent that the Emergency Manager law is unconstitutional because it violates the contracts clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Report also identifies other serious legal and management issues The Report also contains several recommendations, including amending the law; collaborative actions by local, state and federal authorities; and increased federal oversight of the law.
U.S. House Judiciary Committee Democratic Staff Report on the legal implications of Michigan’s Emergency Manager law. The Report represents the first comprehensive legal analysis of the Emergency Managers law since its adoption. Foremost among the Report’s detailed findings is the conclusion, based on expert testimony (including preeminent academic expert Professor Kenneth Klee) and legal precedent that the Emergency Manager law is unconstitutional because it violates the contracts clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Report also identifies other serious legal and management issues The Report also contains several recommendations, including amending the law; collaborative actions by local, state and federal authorities; and increased federal oversight of the law.
Democracy For Sale: Subverting Voting Rights, Collective Bargaining and Accountability Under Michigan's Emergency Manager Law, Final Report of U.S. House Judiciary Committee Democratic Staff, February 21, 2012
U.S. House Judiciary Committee Democratic Staff Report on the legal implications of Michigan’s Emergency Manager law. The Report represents the first comprehensive legal analysis of the Emergency Managers law since its adoption. Foremost among the Report’s detailed findings is the conclusion, based on expert testimony (including preeminent academic expert Professor Kenneth Klee) and legal precedent that the Emergency Manager law is unconstitutional because it violates the contracts clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Report also identifies other serious legal and management issues The Report also contains several recommendations, including amending the law; collaborative actions by local, state and federal authorities; and increased federal oversight of the law.
Democracy for Sale: Subverting Voting
Rights, Collective Bargaining and
Accountability under Michigan’s
Emergency Manager Law
Interim Report and Recommendations of the
House Judiciary Committee Democratic Staff
February 21, 2012Democracy for Sale: Subverting Voting Rights, Collective Bargaining and
Accountability under Michigan's Emergency Manager Law
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Background Facts -
Findings
1. ‘The EM Is Unconstitutional Because It Violates the Contracts Clause of the
Constitution .. re
A. What Public Act 4 Provides
B. What the Constitution Provides
5 C. How the EM Law Violates the Contract Clause ..
1, The EM Law Authorizes the Substantial Impairment of
Collective Bargaining Agreements .......
2. Public Act 4 Does Not Promote a Legitimate Public
Purpose ..
3. Public Act 4 Fails the Reasonable and Necessary
Requirement for Constitutional Sufficiency .
D. A Constitutional Altemative to the EM Law Already Exists
I Other Controversial Aspects of the EM Law Will Likely Lead to a
Legal Morass . pudusuenepereesosaadaue 10
A. Limiting Voting Rights and Representative Government ...... 10
B. Possible Violation of Other Michigan and State Constitutional
Protections ... — “13
C. Violations of Mi hhigan’ s Open Meetings Act 14
D. __ Possible Invalidity of Stop-Gap Measures to Thwart Citizen's
Petition Drive cesses ais
IIL The Michigan EM Law Has Not Worked 15
‘A Inconsistent Application and Failure to Meaningfully Steogthen
Jurisdiction’s Finances . 15
B. Examples of Abuse, Mismanagement, and Conflict of Interest
under the Michigan EM Law . . 2 16
Recommendations ....... Bee EEEEEERHEe Re Bae ais
1. New Legislation is Needed. 218
1. A Multi-Pronged Approach is Needed to Respond to the Economic Harm Cause
by the Loss of Manufacturing Jobs and the Recession ..........022..006..19
A. Role of Local Government ce 19
B. Role of State Government ....... “19
C. Role of the Federal Government -20
I. Greater Oversight of the EM Law is Needed 221
End Notes . 23
Appendix . = 28
Michigan Emergency Manager ChronologyMichigan Emergency Manager Law, Final Enrolled Bill
Emergency Manager Law Description
Internal Bill Analysis of Emergency Manager Law, Prepared by Michigan Department of
Treasury
Letter to Department of Justice from Ranking Member Conyers, December 1, 2011
Forum Witness Testimony
Statement on Constitutionality of Michigan Emergency Law Prepared by
Professor Kenneth N. Klee, UCLA School of Law
Statement on Compliance with Voting Rights Act of Michigan Emergency
Manager Law Prepared by Professor Jocelyn Benson, Wayne State Law School
Statement of Joseph L. Harris, Emergency Manager, City of Benton Harbor, MI
Statement of John C. Philo, Legal Director, Sugar Law Center
Statement of James Spiotto, Chapman and Cutler, LLP