Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Sprint vs San Diego Appeal 9th Circuit

Sprint vs San Diego Appeal 9th Circuit

Ratings: (0)|Views: 2 |Likes:
Published by David Sanger

More info:

Published by: David Sanger on Feb 24, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/23/2013

pdf

text

original

 
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 
S
PRINT
T
ELEPHONY
PCS, L.P., aDelaware limited partnership,
Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee,
andP
ACIFIC
B
ELL
W
IRELESS
LLC, aNevada limited liability company,dba Cingular Wireless,
Plaintiff,
v.Nos. 05-56076C
OUNTY OF
S
AN
D
IEGO
, a division05-56435of the State of California; G
REG
D.C. No.
C
OX
, in his capacity as aCV-03-1398-BTMsupervisor of the County of SanDiego; D
IANNE
J
ACOB
, in herOPINIONcapacity as a supervisor of theCounty of San Diego; P
AM
S
LATER
, in her capacity as asupervisor of the County of SanDiego; R
ON
R
OBERTS
, in hiscapacity as a supervisor of theCounty of San Diego; B
ILL
H
ORN
,in his capacity as a supervisor of the County of San Diego,
 Defendants-Appellees/ Cross-Appellants.
Appeals from the United States District Courtfor the Southern District of CaliforniaBarry Ted Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding
12699
 
Argued and SubmittedJune 24, 2008—Pasadena, CaliforniaFiled September 11, 2008Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, andAndrew J. Kleinfeld, Michael Daly Hawkins,A. Wallace Tashima, Sidney R. Thomas, Barry G. Silverman,Susan P. Graber, Ronald M. Gould, Marsha S. Berzon,Richard C. Tallman, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.Opinion by Judge Graber;Concurrence by Judge Gould
12700S
PRINT
T
ELEPHONY
PCS v. C
OUNTY OF
S
AN
D
IEGO
 
COUNSEL
Daniel T. Pascucci and Nathan R. Hamler, Mintz Levin CohnFerris Glovsky and Popeo PC, San Diego, California, for theplaintiff-appellant/cross-appellee.Thomas D. Bunton, Senior Deputy County Counsel, Countyof San Diego, San Diego, California, for the defendants-appellees-cross-appellants.Andrew G. McBride and Joshua S. Turner, Wiley Rein LLP,Washington, D.C.; William K. Sanders, Deputy City Attor-ney, San Francisco, California; Joseph Van Eaton, Miller &Van Eaton, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C.; John J. Flynn III,Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott, LLP, Irvine, California;T. Scott Thompson, Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP, Washing-ton, D.C.; and Elaine Duncan and Jesus G. Roman, VerizonCalifornia, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, for amici curiae.
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:The Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (codified as amended in U.S.C. Titles 15, 18& 47) (“the Act”), precludes state and local governments fromenacting ordinances that prohibit or have the effect of prohib-iting the provision of telecommunications services, includingwireless services. In 2003, Defendant County of San Diegoenacted its Wireless Telecommunications Facilities ordinance.San Diego County Ordinance No. 9549, § 1 (codified as SanDiego County Zoning Ord. §§ 6980-6991, 7352 (“the Ordi-
12703S
PRINT
T
ELEPHONY
PCS v. C
OUNTY OF
S
AN
D
IEGO

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->