You are on page 1of 1

The plaintiff further states that it is Dan and Abby s job is to look out for the safety of the

skiers. We agree with this statement. However, the plaintiff has f ailed to show that Dan and/or Abby breached this duty at any time. ...a moderately skilled skier such as Craig claimed to be... .. Craig decided to knowlingly violate the established norms taught to all begin ning skiers and cut across the slope... Dan and Abby The Defendant cannot be held liable for the inappropriate and unfor eseeable actions of its patrons such as Craig's action... Alex is guilty of contributory negligence His negligence in following NYS Articl e 18 #4 contributed directly to the accident. The amount his inactions contribu ted should be in line with his knowledge and ability, which is by his own admisi on, Expert. {possible new last paragraph} As shown, Alex had a duty to ski responsibly. He clearly breached this duty when he struck fellow skier Craig on the slope. This breach of duty has caused monitary loss to the Defendant in lost wages and lega l fees. We therefore ask the Jury to return a decision for the Defenedant and a ssess damages of $30,000 to cover these expenses.

You might also like