WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2012
3
The Presiding Officer.
The Floor Leader.
Senator Sotto.
Mr. President, I move that we dispense with the reading of the February 21, 2012
Journal
of the Senate sitting as an Impeachment Court, and consider the same as approved.
The Presiding Officer.
Any objection?
[Silence]
There being none, the February 21, 2012Journal of the Senate sitting as an Impeachment Court is hereby approved.The Secretary will now please call the case.
The Secretary.
Case No. 002-2011, in the Matter of Impeachment Trial of Honorable Chief Justice Renato C. Corona.
The Presiding Officer.
Appearances.The Floor Leader.
Senator Sotto.
Yes, for the Prosecution, Mr. President.
Representative Tupas.
Good afternoon, Mr. President, Your Honor. For the Prosecution panelof the House of Representatives, same appearances.
The Presiding Officer.
Noted.The Defense.
Mr. Cuevas.
For the Defense, Your Honor, the same appearance.
The Presiding Officer.
Noted.The Floor Leader.
Senator Sotto.
Mr. President, before the business for the day, Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiagowould like to be recognized.
The Presiding Officer.
The lady-senator from Iloilo is recognized.
Senator Defensor Santiago.
I beg the indulgence of our colleagues in making this manifestation.Our Constitution provides under Article III, which is entitled “The Bill of Rights,” Section 1, “No personshall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be deniedthe equal protection of the laws.” Section 1 is only one sentence. It consists of two parts, what lawyerscall the “due process clause,” and number two, what lawyers call, the “equal protection clause.” Andyet, Section 1 is so powerful that even if you deleted the entire Bill of Rights and remained only withSection 1, every single Filipino citizen would still be entitled to the entire panoply of human rightsenshrined in our Constitution.
Ganoon katindi ang bigat ng
equal protection clause
at ng
due processclause.
Ngayon
, the business for the day is the due process clause. Because, yesterday, Prosecutionwanted to present a PAL officer and the Presiding Officer ruled that because bribery is not allegedunder Article III, then Prosecution cannot present that PAL officer. I support that ruling. In fact, Iinsist on it because of the due process clause of our Constitution. The due process clause is soimportant that, as I said, in the view of certain constitutional experts with tripartite democracies likeours all over the world,
tanggalin mo na ang buong Saligang Batas, iwan mo lang ang
due process
at ang
equal protection clauses,
meron ka ng
protection
ng buong Saligang Batas para sakarapatang pantao.
That is how important due process is.