Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
See Premium Plans
 
THEHIGHCOURT
or
JUSTICECHANCERV'
otvtsto»
VOiCEMAilCLAIMANT
en
NEVVSGROUfNEWSPAFtERS
UMiTECt.
(2)GLENNMUlCAIREGENER!CPART!CULARSOFCLAIMTheParties1.[IdentifyoftheVoiceMailInterceptionClaimant]2.TheFirstDefendantwasthepublisheroftheNewsoftheWorldnewspaperwhich(untilitsrecentclosure)hadaconsiderablereadershipinthisjurisdictionandwhichalsopublisheditscontentonitswebsite
,corn.
3.TheSecondDefendantwasaprivateinvestigatorengagedbytheFirstDefendantthroughhisservicecompanytoprovide"researchandinformationservices"fromaboutOctober1998untilthearrestoftheSecondDefendanton
8
August2006
CEairnanf§mobH®t@!epfi"v:me
eommunteeticns4.Atallrelevanttimes,theClaimanthadamobilephonetelepnoneserviceI!vhichs/heusedregularly("theClaimant'sMobileTelephone'}ThismobiletelephonenumberlsprivatetotheClaimantAtallrelevanttimestheClaimantusedthevoicemailserviceprovidedbyhis/hermobiletelephoneprovider.[TheClaimant'smobiletelephoneserviceprovider,numberanduseofvoicernail]6.TheClaimantsparticularuseofmobiletelephonesandconcernsabout
 
securityifanyandreasonsforchangingmobilestelephones
if
any.[.
7.TheCLaimant'smobiletelephonecommunicationsand
vo.cernails
lef!
by
andfortheClaimant,
together
with
themeans
ofaccessingsuchmessages,includinganyuniquedirectdialnumbers,thepasswords,pinnumbers,areprivateandconfidentialandfailwithinthescopeoftheClaimant'srights
prote-ctedunder
Artide
8oftheEuropeanConventionon
~'iurnan
Rightsand
inrespectof
\ftfhfch
theCiairnanthadandhasa
reasonable
expectationof
privacy.
8.The
Claimant
has,andatallrelevanttimeshashad,areasonableexpectationofprivacyinrespectofthefo!!owinginformation("theMobileTelephoneInformation"):8.
i
Her/Hismobiletelephonenumberandtheinformationnecessaryto
accessvoicernailmessages,namelytheDDN(ifthiswasneeded)and
PINnumber;82Thefactthat
2
particular
person
has
reft
avoicemaiimessagefor
her/him;
8.3Thetimeanddateofthat
votcernail
message,andthecaller'stelephonenumber;
8A
The
contentsofthat
voicemait
message;
8.5Thefactthats/hehasleftavoicernailmessageforaparticularperson;8,6Thetimeanddateofthatvoicemanmessaqe,andnumberofthe
telephoneusedbytheClaimanttoleavethemessage;
a.7Thecontentsofthatvoicernailmessage;and8,8Thenamesandteiephonenumberoftheindividualswithwhoms/he
communicatedbyI"1wbf!etelephone,Tefephonecall,textandiocanondataofthemobiletelephone,
9.TheDefendantsandeachofthemkneworoughttohaveknownthattheMobHeTelephoneInformationwas
confidential,privateandwithinthescopeoftheprotectionaffordedRights.Article
[3
oftheEuropeanConventiononHuman
10.TheClaimantreliesupontheadmissionsmade
by
theFirstDefendant'sLeadingCounsel
on12May2011,intheagreedStatementinOpenCourt
andtheOrdermadeon27May2011("theMiller"c\dmissions"),inthe
2
 
proceedingsbroughtagainst
tile
DefendantsbySiennaMiller("theSiennaMillerAction")andintheFirstDefendant'sAdmissionofFactsdated
n
December2011.",1.TheDefendantsandeachofthemowedtheClaimantadutyofconfidencearid/oradutytorespecttheprivacyoftheClaimantinrespectoftheMobileTelephoneInformation.TheClaimantreliesupontile
Miller
AdmissionsandtheadmtssionsmadeinactionbroughtagainstthesameDefendantsintheKellyHappen,BenJackson,JoanHamme/[andJudeLawactions.
TheF'irst
ILhafendcmi's
EngagementoftheSecondDefendant:"theArrangement"
12.inoraboutOctober1998theSecondDefendantfirstenteredintoanarrangementinrespectofthe
NewsoftheWorld
("theArrangement")withtheFirstDefendantunderthetermsofwhichheagreetoobtain,onrequest,informationaboutspecificindividualsandthirdpartiesconnectedtothem,suchastheirfamilyand/orfriendsand/orcolleaguesbyunlawfulmeansincludingbyinterceptingmobilephonevoicemailmessages.13.
p,s
admitted
ill
theFirstDefendant'sAdmissionofFacts,theArrangementcontinueduntilthearrestoftheSecondDefendanton7August2006,14.AsadmittedintheFirstDefendant'sAdmissionofFacts,theArrangementwasevidencedbyaseriesofwrittenagreementsbetweentheFirstDefendantandtheSecondDefendant(orcompaniescontrolledbyhim),including:
(8)
6June2001:
8
confidentialityagreementbetweentheFirstDefendant(signedbyJournalistAreferredtointheConfidentialSchedule)andtheSecondDefendant(inthename"PaulWilliams")concerningtheprovisionofcontidentlalinformation
by
theSecondDefendant.(b)
ft,
contractdated1September2001signed
by
JournalistAonbehalfoftheFirstDefendantand
EUfO
ResearchandInformationServicesLimited(8companycontrolledbytheSecondDefendant)foraperiodof12months.UnderthiscontracttheSecondDefendantwaspaid£1769.23perweek:£92,000perannum.(c)!i,letterof3greeiTlentdated1September2002be-tween
News
or
theWorld
(signedbyJournalistA)andEuroResearchandInformationServicesforafurtherperiodof12months.UnderthiscontracttheSecondDefendantwaspaid£1769.23perweek:£.92,000perannum.
3
Search
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
    • Notes
    Load more