PENNSYLVANIAIn re: Barack Hussein Obama, II
Barack Hussein Obama,Aka Bmack
ObamaObjecticn of: Charles F. Kerchner, Jr.
MOTION FOR TESTIMONY
Objectors have moved for an order permitting testimony via SKYPE or "similarcomputer conferencing method" at the hearing in this matter scheduled for March 1,2012.ObjectOls assert that their "expert witness" -whose identity and location objectors fail todisclose -"has a prior commitment requiring his presence
Objectors suggest that Candidate or unspecified "other participants" may "require SKYPE orsimilar computer conferencing method in order to participate." Motion,
Objectors' Motion is meritless and should be denied for several reasons:
As discussed in detail
the Motion to Strike and Dismiss filed simultaneouslywith this Memorandum, Objectors' Petition is utterly devoid
merit. Objectors lack standing tochallenge President
nomination petition. Moreover, this Court does not havejurisdiction to determine the qualifications
a candidate's eligibility under the U.S. Constitutionforthe office
the United States. Objectors' filing is legally meritless and shouldbe stricken and dismissed. There is no need for an evidentiary hearing at all, much less oneconducted through the remote "testimony"
unspecified persons who are not present in thecourtroom.