Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Nov 9, 2010, Sheriff Services Fredericton (Regional Office) internal documentation regarding the illegal eviction of October 23, 2009, RTIPPA 'Right to Information Protection of Privacy Act' actually works, better than I expected, although much redaction, here is proof illegal eviction - impugned Orders, as the Residential Tenants of New Brunswick are intended to be protected by Rentalsmen responsible to implement Residential Tenancies Act.

Nov 9, 2010, Sheriff Services Fredericton (Regional Office) internal documentation regarding the illegal eviction of October 23, 2009, RTIPPA 'Right to Information Protection of Privacy Act' actually works, better than I expected, although much redaction, here is proof illegal eviction - impugned Orders, as the Residential Tenants of New Brunswick are intended to be protected by Rentalsmen responsible to implement Residential Tenancies Act.

Ratings: (0)|Views: 445|Likes:

Nov 9, 2010 granting of RTIPPA Info Request from Justice Department regarding October 23, 2009 residential tenant eviction incident. Fredericton, Sheriff Services, (Regional Office), Sheriff Keith Ball, are observed to be trusting seasoned Lawyer George H. LeBlanc, of Moncton, Cox & Palmer, George H. LeBlanc who allegedly on behalf of Mortgagee Royal Bank of Canada and Mecca Corporation purposefully circumvent the Residential Tenancies Act of New Brunswick, therefore go instead to Court of Queens Bench, Moncton Trial Division, before Mr Justice Zoel R. Dionne who is not advised during a ex parte ("for one party" without NOTICE to defendant Andre Murray ) Court Hearing of Motion for Orders, that THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT of NEW BRUNSWICK was Legislative Assembly drafted, issued, then ratified as 'NOTWITHSTANDING' all others Acts of New Brunswick. Therefore no one my circumvent the Chief Rentalsmen. Chief Rentalsmen must first render a decision on matters concerning residential tenancy, then, and only then, perhaps landlord vs tenant are dead locked Chief Rentalsmen may give recommendation to a inter mediator from Court of Queens Bench. What has occurred for so many years, perhaps because of a need for expensive legal challenge... is that lawyers have circumvented the ultimate authority of RENTALSMEN who are appointed by law to administer the RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT Of NEW BRUNSWICK. Currently this matter is before the SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. As Andre Murray has filed to highest Court in the Land for final Ruling based on RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT Of NEW BRUNSWICK moreover CHARTER CHALLENGES as found within Andre Murray's Application for Leave of the Court of SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

Court file MC-0642-09: IN THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF NEW BRUNSWICK, TRIAL DIVISION, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF Moncton. Court File Number: MC/0642/09, BETWEEN: Plaintiffs ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd. a body corporate, and Defendant, ANDRE MURRAY.



http://justicedonedirtcheap.blogspot.ca/



The Lawsuit is over alledged conversion of property, and became litigation based on interpretation of the Residential Tenanies Act of New Brunswick and The Property Act of New Brunswick.



Nov 9, 2010 granting of RTIPPA Info Request from Justice Department regarding October 23, 2009 residential tenant eviction incident. Fredericton, Sheriff Services, (Regional Office), Sheriff Keith Ball, are observed to be trusting seasoned Lawyer George H. LeBlanc, of Moncton, Cox & Palmer, George H. LeBlanc who allegedly on behalf of Mortgagee Royal Bank of Canada and Mecca Corporation purposefully circumvent the Residential Tenancies Act of New Brunswick, therefore go instead to Court of Queens Bench, Moncton Trial Division, before Mr Justice Zoel R. Dionne who is not advised during a ex parte ("for one party" without NOTICE to defendant Andre Murray ) Court Hearing of Motion for Orders, that THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT of NEW BRUNSWICK was Legislative Assembly drafted, issued, then ratified as 'NOTWITHSTANDING' all others Acts of New Brunswick. Therefore no one my circumvent the Chief Rentalsmen. Chief Rentalsmen must first render a decision on matters concerning residential tenancy, then, and only then, perhaps landlord vs tenant are dead locked Chief Rentalsmen may give recommendation to a inter mediator from Court of Queens Bench. What has occurred for so many years, perhaps because of a need for expensive legal challenge... is that lawyers have circumvented the ultimate authority of RENTALSMEN who are appointed by law to administer the RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT Of NEW BRUNSWICK. Currently this matter is before the SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. As Andre Murray has filed to highest Court in the Land for final Ruling based on RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT Of NEW BRUNSWICK moreover CHARTER CHALLENGES as found within Andre Murray's Application for Leave of the Court of SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

Court file MC-0642-09: IN THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF NEW BRUNSWICK, TRIAL DIVISION, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF Moncton. Court File Number: MC/0642/09, BETWEEN: Plaintiffs ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd. a body corporate, and Defendant, ANDRE MURRAY.



http://justicedonedirtcheap.blogspot.ca/



The Lawsuit is over alledged conversion of property, and became litigation based on interpretation of the Residential Tenanies Act of New Brunswick and The Property Act of New Brunswick.


More info:

Published by: Justice Done Dirt Cheap on Feb 29, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/17/2013

pdf

text

original

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->