Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
6Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Nov. 10, 2009, SELF REPRESENT, Mecca Corporation President Richard McGuigan accepts Andre Murray offer of $89,000 lawyer Hugh J. Cameron raises the extortion price to $100,000 with new conditions requiring purchaser to wave all liabilities past, current or further

Nov. 10, 2009, SELF REPRESENT, Mecca Corporation President Richard McGuigan accepts Andre Murray offer of $89,000 lawyer Hugh J. Cameron raises the extortion price to $100,000 with new conditions requiring purchaser to wave all liabilities past, current or further

Ratings: (0)|Views: 34|Likes:

http://justicedonedirtcheap.blogspot.ca/ CLICK HERE FOR VIDEO. "Of course, any such agreement for sale will include a Release, in a form acceptable to our client and the Royal Bank, in favour of both our client and Royal Bank, with respect to the alleged improper eviction and, also, the immediate withdrawal of your Appeal, without costs to either party. This will allow the sale to you to be completed on terms acceptable to our client." At this point in time, of writing the above excerpt of herein provided letter, Lawyer Hugh J. Cameron had continues to have a "cease and desist" against Cameron for uttering threats to Andre Murray, inter alia (Latin: amongst other things) saying in no uncertain words that should Andre Murray not grant access to Hugh J. Cameron when he attends 29 Marshall Street, Fredericton, New Brunswick the residence of Murray at that time should Murray not grant Hugh J. Cameron access then the men, which will be accompanying Hugh Cameron, would somehow force their way inside Andre's house... with out consent... of course this is preposterous and extremely absurd remarks coming from a man who calls himself a lawyer. This of course is the reason for Hugh J. Cameron wanting "immediate withdrawal of your Appeal" also a" Release" from all liability suffered by victim Andre Murray to date.

Court file MC-0642-09: IN THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF NEW BRUNSWICK, TRIAL DIVISION, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF Moncton. Court File Number: MC/0642/09, BETWEEN: Plaintiffs ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd. a body corporate, and Defendant, ANDRE MURRAY.



http://justicedonedirtcheap.blogspot.ca/



The Lawsuit is over alledged conversion of property, and became litigation based on interpretation of the Residential Tenanies Act of New Brunswick and The Property Act of New Brunswick.

http://justicedonedirtcheap.blogspot.ca/ CLICK HERE FOR VIDEO. "Of course, any such agreement for sale will include a Release, in a form acceptable to our client and the Royal Bank, in favour of both our client and Royal Bank, with respect to the alleged improper eviction and, also, the immediate withdrawal of your Appeal, without costs to either party. This will allow the sale to you to be completed on terms acceptable to our client." At this point in time, of writing the above excerpt of herein provided letter, Lawyer Hugh J. Cameron had continues to have a "cease and desist" against Cameron for uttering threats to Andre Murray, inter alia (Latin: amongst other things) saying in no uncertain words that should Andre Murray not grant access to Hugh J. Cameron when he attends 29 Marshall Street, Fredericton, New Brunswick the residence of Murray at that time should Murray not grant Hugh J. Cameron access then the men, which will be accompanying Hugh Cameron, would somehow force their way inside Andre's house... with out consent... of course this is preposterous and extremely absurd remarks coming from a man who calls himself a lawyer. This of course is the reason for Hugh J. Cameron wanting "immediate withdrawal of your Appeal" also a" Release" from all liability suffered by victim Andre Murray to date.

Court file MC-0642-09: IN THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF NEW BRUNSWICK, TRIAL DIVISION, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF Moncton. Court File Number: MC/0642/09, BETWEEN: Plaintiffs ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd. a body corporate, and Defendant, ANDRE MURRAY.



http://justicedonedirtcheap.blogspot.ca/



The Lawsuit is over alledged conversion of property, and became litigation based on interpretation of the Residential Tenanies Act of New Brunswick and The Property Act of New Brunswick.

More info:

Published by: Justice Done Dirt Cheap on Mar 01, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/17/2013

pdf

text

original

 
from: Hugh J. Cameronhcameron@smss.com to: andremurraynow@gmail.comdate: Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:59 PMsubject: FW: WITHOUT PREJUDICEWITHOUT PREJUDICEDear Mr. MurrayMr. McGuigan has sent your email (below) to me for response.As he advised you previously, when you first called him, his companyagrees to sell you the Property for the sum of $100,000.00 on an "as is"basis, without further adjustments.If you agree to purchase the Property, and have the funds to do so, thenplease deposit those funds, in trust, with your own lawyer. Please havehim or her contact me to arrange to close the transaction.Given the pending resumption of the Appeal hearing, this must be donebefore noon on Thursday. This can all be accomplished in that timeperiod.If you do not have a lawyer, you need one, as we are not in a positionto act for both sides of the transaction.Of course, any such agreement for sale will include a Release, in a formacceptable to our client and the Royal Bank, in favour of both ourclient AND Royal Bank, with respect to the alleged improper evictionand, also, the immediate withdrawal of your Appeal, without costs toeither party. This will allow the sale to you to be completed on termsacceptable to our client.If this is acceptable to you, please confirm this by return email.If it is NOT acceptable to you, then please continue your Appeal.Please note that this response to your offer to our client to buy theProperty is on a WITHOUT PREJUDICE basis, meaning, that this agreement,if concluded, is not an admission of liability by anyone, whatsoever,and neither you, nor our client, will disclose these discussions(which you instigated) to the Court at any time.This is not subject to any further negotiation or extension.
 
 Please refer any and all responses to me. Mr. McGuigan will not beresponding to any communication to him, except through me.Thank you and regards,Hugh Cameron----Original Message-----From: Andre Murray [mailto:andremurraynow@gmail.com]Sent: November-10-09 7:52 AMTo:richard@meccacorporation.com Subject: Follow up on discussionDear Richard McGuiganI must say I did enjoy or discussion regarding the Auctioned Mortgagesale property on Marshall Street!I do apologize for the delay in a follow up on our discussion.Note as of 23rd of October I was surprised at my Marshall StreetResidence in the early am by the sound of a door handle being forciblyremoved by a person whom identified himself as a property managementprofessional contracted by Royal Bank Of Canada to enforce the evictionof myself from 29 Marshall Street.There he was standing in front of me, just outside the house with thehandle of and for the front door of civic address 31 Marshall Street inhis hand.He quickly served me the court order referencing 29 Marshall Streetwhich I pointed out was next door. He did not care about that "minordetail"furthermore stated "I do not care what you say about that you are out of here any way"Please Richard understand that I do not in any way blame you for this.The Royal Bank Of Canada solicitor and a solicitor acting on behalf of acertain501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate hired a Process Server and causedcertain Court documents, which are required by the Rules Of Court, to
 
be served upon the defendant Andre Murray not less Ten days before anytrial hearing.The documents where left by the Process Server at the base of a door inever use.Furthermore , that I might obviously appear and Counter Claim wasprevented.Why was the hearing being held in Moncton in a separate Jurisdiction -highly unusual I am told!The fact is this may have worked in their favor as I was not notifiedand the trial - hearing went a head EX PARTE the request - a MOTION FORAN ORDER TO VACATE ANDRE MURRAY from 29 Marshall Street was granted.Moving ahead quickly Richard I just left a APPEAL COURT HEARINGregarding this same matter yesterday, where it was revealed that I doin fact have a legal binding tenancy of 29 Marshall Street & 31 MarshallStreet.What now!?The hearing had to be Adjourned and will continue later... ( shortage of time for the judge to hear more).As interesting as all this may seem it is exhausting and becomingtedious.I am not enjoying life and my world is literally and physically upsidedown.I want all this distraction to go away.I am not interested in creating a MAKE WORK PROJECT for a bunch of lawyers....shuffling back and forth between Moncton contrary to Rulesof Court #45.02 and ultimately at our expense.Forgive me for sounding skeptical but resolving legal matters quicklycould put a lawyer guy out of business. Correct!!I have plans to marry and Marshall Street was going to be my fixer upperproject home.The absentee Landlord whom I have never met ( only email and regularmail correspondence ) convinced me to invest in the good old house andpromised ownership within four years if I should care to Exercise myRight Of First Refusal Contractual Agreement.When on the forth year I attempted to Exercise my Right Of First Refusal

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->