International Journal of Research in Computer ScienceeISSN 2249-8265 Volume 2 Issue 2 (2011) pp. 7-14© White Globe Publicationswww.ijorcs.orgwww.ijorcs.org
UNIFICATION OF RANDOMIZED ANOMALY IN DECEPTIONDETECTION USING FUZZY LOGIC UNDER UNCERTAINTY
Research Scholar/Bharathiar University, Asst.Prof & Head / CSE, NIET,Coimbatore, India.
Research Scholar, Dept. Of Computer Science, St.Xavier’s College, Tirunelveli, India.
Associate Professor & Head, Dept. Of Computer Science, St.Xavier’s College, Tirunelveli, India.
In the recent era of computer electroniccommunication we are currently facing the criticalimpact of Deception which plays its vital role in themode of affecting efficient information sharing system. Identifying Deception in any mode of communicationis a tedious process without using the proper tool for detecting those vulnerabilities. This paper deals withthe efficient tools of Deception detection in whichcombined application implementation is our main focus rather than with its individuality. We propose aresearch model which comprises Fuzzy logic,Uncertainty and Randomization. This paper deals withan experiment which implements the scenario of mixture application with its revealed results. We alsodiscuss the combined approach rather than with itsindividual performance.
Deception, Detection, Uncertainty, Fuzzylogic, Randomness
INTRODUCTIONDetection of Deception is useful for managers,employers, and for anyone to use in everydaysituations where telling the truth from a lie can helpprevent you from being a victim of fraud/scams andother deceptions .
Identifying the Deception
Deception detection between relational partners isextremely difficult, unless a partner tells a blatant orobvious lie or contradicts something the other partnerknows to be true .
Fuzzy logic is the part of artificial intelligence ormachine learning which interprets a human’s actions.Computers can interpret only true or false values but ahuman being can reason the degree of truth or degreeof falseness. Fuzzy models interpret the human actionsand are also called intelligent systems .Fuzzification is the process of changing a real scalarvalue into a fuzzy value. This is achieved with thedifferent types of fuzzifiers. Fuzzification of a real-valued variable is done with intuition, experience andanalysis of the set of rules and conditions associatedwith the input data variables. There is no fixed set of procedures for the fuzzification .
Uncertainty must be taken in a sense radicallydistinct from the familiar notion of risk, from which ithas never been properly separated. Although the termsare used in various ways among the general public,many specialists in decision theory, statistics and otherquantitative fields have defined uncertainty, risk, andtheir measurement as follows:1.
Uncertainty: A state of having limited knowledgewhere it is impossible to exactly describe existingstate or future outcome, more than one possibleoutcome.2.
Measurement of Uncertainty: A set of possiblestates or outcomes where probabilities are assignedto each possible state or outcome.3.
Risk: A state of uncertainty where some possibleoutcomes have an undesired effect or significantloss.4.
Measurement of Risk: A set of measureduncertainties where some possible outcomes arelosses, and the magnitudes of those losses variables.
The Dictionary of Oxford defines 'random' as"Having no definite aim or purpose; not sent or guidedin a particular direction; made, done, occurring, etc.,without method or conscious choice; haphazard." Thisconcept of randomness suggests a non-order or non-coherence in a sequence of steps or symbols, such thatthere is no intelligible pattern or combination .II.
PROPOSED RESEARCH MODELThe following figures show the basic and itsexpanded form for the proposed model.