Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
8Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Response to Motion To Dismiss Barack Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge

Response to Motion To Dismiss Barack Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge

Ratings: (0)|Views: 400 |Likes:
Published by Freedom&Liberty
This is the Reponse to Barack Obama's Motion to Dismiss in the ballot challenge appeal to Superior Court in Fulton County Georgia
This is the Reponse to Barack Obama's Motion to Dismiss in the ballot challenge appeal to Superior Court in Fulton County Georgia

More info:

Published by: Freedom&Liberty on Mar 02, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/29/2014

pdf

text

original

 
1
CODY ROBERT JUDYPro Se3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite 2Ogden, UT. 84403(801)497-6655Email: codyjudy@hotmail.com  Web Site: www.codyjudy.us  ___________________________________________________________________FULTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURTSTATE OF GEORGIA__________________________________________________________DAVID FARRAR,CODY ROBERT JUDY,RESPONSE TOMOTION TO DISMISSPetitioner(s),v.
Case #
2012-CV-211398BARACK OBAMA, Judge: Cynthia D. WrightSECRETARY OF STATERespondent(s).___________________________________________________________COMES NOW, Petitioner(s), CODY ROBERT JUDY pro se, and DAVID FARRAR,also pro se, and submits respectfully to the Fulton County Superior Court this,
RESPONSE TOMOTION TO DISMISS
. Petitioner(s) do so pursuant to the Courts consideration,announcement, and directive sent by email March 1
st
,2012 that a response was due March 2
nd
 2012 by 9:45AM, in light of the circumstances of the Appeal requiring a decision prior to theMarch 6
th
, 2012 Democratic Party primary. Whereupon the Democratic Party and all eligiblevoters would not be biased from a reversal,
of the Administrative Court‟s recommendation and
thereupon Secretary of State Brian Kemps decision: sustaining in the Appeal that Barack Obamawas not eligible to be placed upon the Georgia Ballot for the office of President of the United
 
States of America in the coming Nov. 2012 election allowing time for said Democratic Party tosubmit a name(s), established by the Petitioner(s) herein as Cody Robert Judy, who is aregistered Federal Election Commission candidate for President of the United States in theDemocratic Party, eligible under the Constitution as a natural born citizen, being born in IdahoFalls, Idaho in 1965 to parents who were Citizens after the adoption of the Constitution andmeeting all the requirements of eligibility, providing competitive standing in the presidentialrace, to Secretary of State Kemp in order to be placed upon the Ballot established for PrimaryVoters in Georgia attending the March 6
th 2012
Super Tuesday Primary.
ARGUMENT FIRST DEFENSE FAILS
1-
 
Respondent list nearly two (2) pages of court cases in foot note one (
1
) with thesummation and presumption that application of those cases be asserted in this particularcase
stating boldly, „not a single case has ever be
en
upheld‟.
Petitioner(s) will elaborateon the application of a few of those cases as it applies in these instances since Respondenthas brought them up, introduced them, and expects the Court to Dismiss this case becauseof them, in affect absorbing them on account of standing and as a provocative insult in
„harassing‟ the Respondent.
 2-
 
Petitioner(s) asserts that Ballot Challenges have been upheld in many instances, however
in Mr. Barack Obama‟s relative challenges most
 
cases have been dismissed for „lack of standing‟ or in other words as the
District Courts related no one had standing, howeverthe 9
th
Circuit Court appellate judges said:a.
 
The individuals who were politically connected to the race should hold aninterest in a fair outcome
 – 
including whether there was an ineligible candidateaboard the ticket.
1
 
 
b.
 
The opinion from judges Harry Pregerson, Ray Fisher and Marsha Berzonexplained the concept is called "competitive standing," and they affirmed it aslegitimate grounds for concern.
1
 c.
 
"This notion of 'competitive standing' has been recognized by several circuits,"the opinion said. "We, too, have upheld the notion of 'competitive standing.' InOwen v. Mulligan, we held that the 'potential loss of an election' was an injury-in-fact sufficient to give a local candidate and Republican Party officials standing. Inthat case, the candidate for local office sued the Postal Service for giving his rivala preferential mailing rate, in violation of its own regulations."
1
 The opinion said the case had the candidate and party officials seeking "to preventtheir opponent from gaining an unfair advantage." However, in Obama's case, thecourt panel simply said once the inauguration was held, the claims evaporated andthe judges wrote, "Once the 2008 election was over and the president sworn in,Keyes, Drake and Lightfoot were no longer 'candidates' for the 2008 generalelection. Moreover, they have not alleged any interest in running against PresidentObama in the future.(
i
) "Therefore, none of the plaintiffs could claim that theywould be injured by the 'potential loss of an election,'" the court said.
1
 i.
 
This is an interesting note further demonstrating the legitimacy of thePetitioner(s) cause as Mr. Cody Robert Judy did run in 2008 and is alsorunning in 2012 and sued both Sen. John McCain and Barack Obama fornot being eligible as is discussed further on page 5 of this complaint.d.
 
It is also important to note the Appeals decision never went so far as stating thatBarack Obama was eligible to be President by the demands of qualification forsaid office in the United States Constitution or Supreme Law of the Land.

Activity (8)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Freedom&Liberty added this note
Sure makes you wonder doesn't it. Boy its a cryn shame for sure.
Billy Norton added this note
They are all in the tank for the userper. I can't help but wonder what power he is holding over everone's head. Are all of our public officals corrupt??
jjandbobscribd liked this
silverbull8 liked this
Jack Ryan liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->