Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Powell v Obama, Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, Fulton County Superior Court, 3-2-2012

Powell v Obama, Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, Fulton County Superior Court, 3-2-2012

Ratings: (0)|Views: 7,488 |Likes:
Powell v Obama, Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, Fulton County Superior Court, 3-2-2012

http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html
Powell v Obama, Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, Fulton County Superior Court, 3-2-2012

http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html

More info:

Published by: Article II Super PAC on Mar 02, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/02/2012

pdf

text

original

 
INTHESUPERIORCOURTOFFULTONCOUNTYSTATEOFGEORGIAKEVINRICHARDPOWELL,
*
Petitioner
*
CIVILACTIONV.
*
FILENO.'2012CV211528BARACKOBAMA,
*
Respondent
*
PETITIONER'SRESPONSETORESPONDENT'SMOTIONTODISMISS
NowcomesPetitionerKevinRichardPowell,byandthroughundersignedcounsel,andrespondstoRespondentBarackObama'sMotiontoDismisshereinasfollows:
PRELIMINARYSTATEMENT
RespondentObama'sMotiontoDismissinitiallyclaimsthattheinstantcaseisoneinaseriesofcasesfiledacrossthecountrysince2008in"[aJnefforttoharass"Respondent.Respondentfurtherclaimsthatthoseindividuals,presumablyincludingPetitionerherein,bringingchallengestoRespondent'squalificationsforoffice"ignoreproceduralandevidentiaryrequirementsbecausetheirclaimsarewithoutmerit,basedonfantasy,andofferedinpursuitofapoliticalagenda.
H
Finally,Respondentclaimsthathe"wasaUnitedStatescitizenfromthemomentofhisbirthinHawaii
u
andthattherefore,"allConstitutional(sic)qualificationshavebeenmet.
H
Areviewof
Page
-1-
 
therecordinthisaction,however,revealsthatRespondent'sassertionsarecompletelymisguided.Petitionerfirstnotesthatnoindividual,includingRespondentObama,hasa
vestedright
tobethePresidentoftheUnitedStates.AnindividualseekingtoholdtheOfficeofthePresidencyisexpectedandrequiredtocomplywiththeprovisionsoftheConstitution,includingtheeligibilityrequirementsforthepresidency,andthelawsoftheUnitedStatesandtheSeveralStatesthereof.Withtheforegoinginmind,PetitionerwouldpointoutthatitwasRespondentObama,infact,whoinitiatedthesubmissionofhisnameasacandidatetobelistedontheGeorgiaDemocraticPresidentialBallot.Likewise,inaccordancewithhisrightsunderGeorgialaw,PetitionerraisedanadministrativechallengetotheRespondent'squalificationsasa"naturalbornCitizen"pursuanttoArticleIIoftheUnitedStatesConstitution.Respondentandhislawyertried,unsuccessfully,tohavePetitioner'schallengedismissed.RespondentwasthenlegallyservedwithaNoticetoProduce,requiringhimtoappearattrialandtobringcertaindocumentsanditemsofevidencewithhim.TheRespondentdidnotobject.Whenthetimefortrialwasimminent,theRespondent'slawyerwrotealettertotheGeorgiaSecretaryofStateinwhichheboldlycriticizedandattackedtheadministrativelawjudge
Page-2-
 
andinwhichhestatedthatheandhisclientwererefusingtocometocourt.Thedayoftrial,whenRespondenthadnoeventsordutiesonhisofficialpublicschedule,andaftertheSecretaryofStatehadwarnedhimthathisfailuretoappearwouldbeathisownperil,theRespondentandhislawyerneverthelessfailedtoappearforcourtandfailedtocomplywithPetitioner'svalidNoticetoProduce.TheR~spondentthusnotonlypresentednoevidenceofhisownastohiseligibilityforoffice,buthefailedtoproducesignificantpiecesofevidencetowhichPetitionerwaslegallyentitled.InviewoftheforegoingmisconductandfailingsofRespondentandhislawyer,andconsideringRespondent'stotaldisregardofthelawsofthisStateandthejudiciarythereof,itappearsthat
itisRespondent,
andnotPetitioner,who"ignore[s]proceduralandevidentiaryrequirements,"whois"inpursuitofapoliticalagenda,"andwhosefactualassertions-whichhefailstosupportwith.anyevidence-are"basedonfantasy."Petitioner,farfromseekingto"harass"anyone,issimplyavailinghimselfoflawfulproceduresunderGeorgialawinordertoproperlyraiseandhavefinallydeterminedtheissueofwhetherRespondent,
whosefatherwas
a
foreignnationalandnever
a
UnitedStatescitizen,
isa"naturalbornCitizen"eligibleunderArticleIIoftheConstitutionforthePresidencyoftheUnitedStates.Inthatregard,Petitionercontendsthatthe
Page
-3-

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->