andinwhichhestatedthatheandhisclientwererefusingtocometocourt.Thedayoftrial,whenRespondenthadnoeventsordutiesonhisofficialpublicschedule,andaftertheSecretaryofStatehadwarnedhimthathisfailuretoappearwouldbeathisownperil,theRespondentandhislawyerneverthelessfailedtoappearforcourtandfailedtocomplywithPetitioner'svalidNoticetoProduce.TheRespondentthusnotonlypresentednoevidenceofhisownastohiseligibilityforoffice,buthefailedtoproducesignificantpiecesofevidencetowhichPetitionerwaslegallyentitled.InviewoftheforegoingmisconductandfailingsofRespondentandhislawyer,andconsideringRespondent'stotaldisregardofthelawsofthisStateandthejudiciarythereof,itappearsthat
itisRespondent,
andnotPetitioner,who"ignore[s]proceduralandevidentiaryrequirements,"whois"inpursuitofapoliticalagenda,"andwhosefactualassertions-whichhefailstosupportwithanyevidence-ar~"basedonfantasy."Petitioner,farfromseekingto"harass"anyone,issimplyavailinghimselfoflawfulproceduresunderGeorgialawinordertoproperlyraiseandhavefinallydeterminedtheissueofwheth~rRespondent,
whosefatherwasaforeignnationalandneveraUnitedStatescitizen,
isa"naturalbornCitizen"eligibleunderArticleIIoftheConstitutionforthePresidencyoftheUnitedStates.Inthatregard,Petitionercontendsthatthe
Page-3-