This explanatory note constitutes the comparison of the result interpretation of a gas-dynamic research on the one of Western Siberia

fields. The well opens Senomanian gas pool. The first variant of research interpretation (attachment 1) is made by field users geology service applying standard methods described in the guidance of gas and gas-condensate well research. The second variant is made by SIAM company with the appliance of modern methods of research data processing using the PanSystem Software (attachment 2). Table 1 Standard methods SIAM methods The list of received parameters A and B filtrational coefficients formation pressure AOF of well A and B filtrational coefficients formation pressure AOF of well Permeability Skin-factor D coefficient that characterize a dArcy low decline Single impermeable border As you may see from the table 1, applying the modern methods of well-testing interpretation you may get a longer list of the received parameters. The presence of wider range of parameters allow conducting of the overall design oversight: 1. Permeability - layer efficient permeability oversight enable to estimate in differ way the influence of the water breakthrough and the interlayer development on the current well production, particularly in comparison with the last period research; 2. Skin-factor this parameter would allow to estimate the wellbore zone condition not only in a terms of quality, but also in a terms of quantity. In this particular case the skin-factor value is close to zero and it tells about good wellbore and reservoir communication; 3. Turbulence coefficient D is the additional parameter that is introduced in dArcy equation to take account the fluid stream deflection from the laminar flow; 4. Single impermeable border given the generated authoring system the presence of such borders may tell of neighbor well influence on the analyzed well production. It also may be connected with geology (structure abnormalities, replacing, collector pinching out) that is particularly important on the stage of well and objects development and producing tests. Yet the research is the additional source of information while prepare the geology model of the field the list of research result can be enhanced significantly and it may be differ from one research to other if there are some specific features in the well and the reservoir operation. (the presence of hydraulic fracturing, secondary porosity, bottom water, partial collector opening by well etc.)

Attachment 1

Act of WT survey results

Results
Filtration coefficient values: ""= 0.731263; ""= 0.000045 Absolute free production rate 3585.5 thousand cu.m/day Reservoir pressure: 56,55 bar

Plots

* Instrumental data are not included in this report as a measure of trade select

Attachment 2 Filtering features determination Results:

Permeability: 77.6 Pseudo-radial skin: -0.72 D: 2.93E-06 1/(cu.m/day) Boundary type: Single Distance till impermeable boundary: 61.20 m Transmissibility: 0.32 cu.m/MPa*sec piezoconductivity: 0.33 sq.m/sec Extrapolated pressure (reservoir): 56.6 bar Liner flow coefficient (B): 0.0006 (bar)/(cu/m/day) Non-Darcy flow coefficient (F): 3.21E-10 (bar)/(cu/m/day) Linear flow coefficient (B)(2) 0.0008 (bar)/(cu/m/day) Non-Darcy flow coefficient (F)(2): 2.04E-10 (bar)/(cu/m/day) Free production rate: 2.32E+06 cu.m/day

Plots