STATEOFMAINECIVIL
TDBANKN.A.
fjkja
FIRSTMASSACHUSETTSBANKN.A.
Plaintiff,
v.
TWILAA.BUTLER
fjkja
WOLFANDCHARLTONA.BUTLERJR.
prose
Defendant
and
Defendant-Intervenor.
COUNTYOFPENOBSCOTSUPERIORDISTRICTCOURT
CaseNo.:BANSC-RE-2010-1B7Judge:
J!NJUNCTIYERELIEFSOUGHT)[)EFENDANT'SMOTIONTOCOMPELPLAINTIFFSRESPONDTO)[)EFENDANT'SFUTUREDISCOVERYREQUESTSBYWAYOFCOURTSUPERVISEDDISCOVERYINCORPORATEDI[)EFENDANTSEXHIBITSANDMEMORANDUMOFLAW.JURYTRIALDEMANDED
[Defendantsfiledconcurrentlythefollowing:]NoticeofMotion,Defendant'sSeparateStatementofUndisputedFacts,DefendantsObjectiontoPlaintiffsWitnesses,AffidavitsandExhibits,IncorporatedMotionToStrikeandMemorandumoflaw,SwornAffidavitofDefendantTwilaA.Butler
fjkja
Wolf,DefendantsObjectionToPlaintiffsMotionforaLiftingofStayAndMotionForSummaryJudgment,Defendant'sMotiontoDisqualifyOpposingCounselIncorporatedMotionforSanctions,DeclaratoryandPermanentInjunctiveReliefMemorandumofLawandSupportingExhibits.[ProposedOrderGrantingDefendantsMotion]DateofHearing:_TimeofHearing:_
DEFENDANT'SMOTIONTOCOMPELPLAINTIFFSRESPONDTODEFENDANT'SFUTUREDISCOVERYREQUESTSBYWAYOFCOURTSUPERVISEDDISCOVERYINCORPORATEDDEFENDANTSEXHIBITSANDMEMORANDUMOFLAW,TITLETOREALeROPEBTYINVOLVED
~~~~~~~
WRY
IBI4LDEMANDEIl
NOW,comeDefendantspursuanttolocalrules,particularlyS(d),Defendant'sherebymovethisCourttocompelPlaintiffsandcounseltorespondtoDiscovery
visavis
bywayofCourtSuperviseddiscovery;beingbasedonthefollowingfacts:
DefendantsMotionToCompelCourtSupervisedDiscovery
STATEOFMAINECIVILCOUNTYOFPENOBSCOTSUPERIORDISTRICTCOURT
-BACKGROUND-
1.Requestforinformation,Pre-Discoveryphase,bywayofQualifiedWrittenRequest,hereinafter"QWR,"wassubmittedtoPlaintiffs,throughcounsel,beingobviouslyboundtoa"DutyofCare"and"DueDiligence,"aswelltheprofessionalrequirements,bothasanofficerofthecourt,andrequiredbytheMaineBar.2.HavingreceivedDefendant'sQWRmailedonoraboutApril25
th
andreceivedonoraboutApril
27th2011;
asreferenced,inPlaintiffs,ResponsetoDefendants,Pre-Discovery,QWR,wasargumentativeandultimatelyresultedindenyingofcredulouslegalrequestsforedificationastowho[exactly]arePlaintiffs?Whatisthisloantheyarespeakingofandbeingtoldatmediationandbywayofelectronicdatatransmission,
knowninthecommonvernacularasemailbetweenboththePlaintiffsand,atthetimeDefendantsattorneysfromPinetreeLegal,emailingeachotheraboutthatcrazywhoisaskingaboutandpointingoutthemultipleactsoffraudandassuchDefendantsoffer
It
If
DefendantsExhibit
"A.""Al""A2""A3"
ami
"A4".M-.£6
liS
3.Defendantsnevermade,noragreedto,norwereDefendantseverdisclosed[to],period,inanyway,atall,notevenremotely,asrequiredbybothTILAandRESPA,nottomentionthenumerousStateandFederalcommonlawfrauds,currentlyatbar,thatPlaintiffsdespitebeingwellaware,ofthefact,[that]they,donot[i]nfacthave,inhand;asamatteroflaw,thatpieceofrealproperty,"TheNote,"asdescribedbyformerlawprofessor,andcurrentattorneyatLaw.DefendantsExhibit"B.",4.Plaintiffsmusthaveinhand,thedocumentsrequired,theoriginaldocuments,bywhichtoenforcetheirnotionthattheyowntheloaninquestionandthatitwasinfact
DefendantsMotionToCompelCourtSupervisedDiscovery
N
Q)
C(
ro
Q.,
STATEOFMAINECIVILCOUNTYOFPENOBSCOTSUPERIORDISTRICTCOURT
madetoDefendantsandinthatmannerprovetheirrightthroughtheprovingofstandingtheyknowtheycannotdo.5.Plaintiffsarewellawareofsuch,orshouldbe,havingdoneduediligence,onecanreasonablyassumethiswasdone;ifoneisgoingtoassertandorcontendsomethingastrueandthedifferencebeingtheperceptionthattheyareeitherinnocentlygatheringawitnessestestimonyorguiltilyofsuborningperjuredtestimony,itwouldseemthepersonwoulddothe"DueDiligence"requiredbylaw,itbeingjustgoodcommonsense.6.Asimplereadingandunderstandingofbasicpropertylaw,contractlawetc...providingworkrulesanypracticingattorneyhasreadandknows,asamatterofdaytodayworkproductgeneration,shouldknowandshouldhaveappliedthatknowledgehere.7.ThusPlaintiffs,ascanbereasonablyinferredfromtheircolorableactions,areneverthelessattemptingtoforecloseonapieceofpropertytheyknow,orshouldknowiscurrentlyonappeal,andareattempting,again,todefraudtheStateofMaine,theirclientsandthishonorablecourt.Plaintiffs,counsel'sactions,arequestionable,ethically,atbest.Criminalandactionablebehaviorthatissuretoleadtotheirdisbarmentat
worstandmoreaquestionforajurytodecide,indetermining,scienter.8.Scienter,beingreasonablyinferredfromPlaintiffsactionsinmovingthecourttoliftastayandmovetofinaljudgment;onthismatter,whentheyknow,orshouldknow,thatoutlinedinHP128LD145,setforvoteandenactmentatthenextseatingoftheMaine
Legislature,willrequire,thatPlaintiffshaveinhandbeforetheyinitiateaforeclosurethedocumentsrequiredtolegallyproceed;includingallcurrentactionsbeforethecourt.Plaintiffsknoworshouldknowthattheseverysetoffacts,asoutlinedinDefendants
DefendantsMotionToCompelCourtSupervisedDiscovery
M
Q)
b.C
ell
Q..
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Defendants Motion to Compel Supervised Discovery No Exhibits 0001
Motion of Defendants to move the court to make all further discovery between plaintiffs and defendants court supervised due to the level of noncooperation of plaintiffs and their penchant for re-defining the already established legal wording…
(More)
270
Reads
3
Readcasts
0
Embed Views
Recommended
More From This User
Notes
Load more
