FEBRUARY
2012
3
In 2008,
8.5million
womenworldwide had
serious
medicalcomplicationsfrom
unsafe
abortions.Abortion rates are
higher
incountries wherethe procedure is
illegal
.
Abortion rates were lowestin Western Europe (~12/1000)and highest in Eastern Europe(~43/1000). The North Americanrate was
~19/1000.
Almost all
unsafeabortions
were in
developingcountries
, where thenumber of family planning andcontraceptive programs havestopped increasing.About
47,000 women
across the globe died fromunsafe abortions in
2008
.There are higherabortion rates andregions with
morerestrictivelegislation
.
Nearly half
of allabortions worldwide are unsafe.Better access to birth control indeveloped countries resultedin
fewer unwantedpregnancies
.
FOR
HEALTH,
FOR
WOMEN,
FOR
LIFE.
T
here is an unfortunate dichotomy in ourculture that says one either has to be “pro-choice” or “pro-life”, as if those who agreewith keeping abortion legal are in e
ect “an-ti-life.” This is how many conservatives havecome to adopt the term “pro-abortion” whenreferring to anyone under the pro-choicebanner. But let it be stressed that no one, re-gardless of political or religious a
liation, ispro-abortion. There is no anti-life sentimentto be found, but rather the acknowledge-ment that a necessary evil must be providedin order to protect the mental and physicalwell-being of women across the globe. Re-produced here is a study from Gilda Sedgh,et al. that brings to light the dangers of out-lawing abortion, and shows how one can bepro-choice and still be pro
-life.
Source: “Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to2008,” by Gilda Sedgh et al.
The Lancet
-Abortions per 1000 women ages 15-44
Why “pro-choice” doesn’t mean “anti-life.”