Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
1Center or American Progress | China and the Collapse o Its Noninterventionist Foreign Policy
China and the Collapse of ItsNoninterventionist Foreign Policy
Past Diplomatic Practices Collide with Rising Economicand Political Realities
Ken Sofer March 8, 2012
Introduction
In a move ha sparked inernaional condemnaion and anger, China and Russia onFebruary 4 veoed a U.N. Securiy Council resoluion condemning he Syrian gov-ernmen’s brual crackdown on anigovernmen proesors. Reecing widespreadsenimen, Secreary o Sae Hillary Clinon said, “Wha happened yeserday ahe Unied Naions was a ravesy .
1
Ou on he srees Syrian and Libyan proesersresponded o he veo by spraying grai on he walls o and hrowing rocks and eggsa he Chinese Embassy in Libya.
2
Chinese diplomas view heir veo o he Syria resoluion as par o heir long-sand-ing oreign policy principle o “non-inererence in oher counry’s inernal aairs”( bu ganshe neizheng).
3
Since he 1950s his principle helped China mainain a low prole on he global sage, economize on miliary spending, maximize he resourcesdireced oward domesic economic growh, and build oreign policy relaionships wih a wide variey o regime ypes.imes are changing, however, and in recen years noninererence is jus as likely o bringmajor inernaional condemnaion—no only rom he Wesern powers, bu also romhe ciizens o developing naions ha would radiionally have suppored his approach.Te primary reason or his shif is China’s economic expansion. Chinese companies areinerering in oher counries as never beore—pulling Beijing ino relaions wih requenly unsable regimes around he world—which oday pis China’s radiional oreign policy principle o noninervenion agains he realiy o is economic ineress in he 21s cenury.How will Chinese oreign policy change as a resul o hese new ensions? Tis issue brie examines specic insances abroad where Chinese acions or invesmens are causing he breakdown o he naion’s once-deermined noninervenionism. We hen look a he
 
2Center or American Progress | China and the Collapse o Its Noninterventionist Foreign Policy
pressure o change is oreign policy in more deail—boh wihin China and around he world—beore skeching ou where we hink China may end up in he coming years.
 The history of China’s noninterventionist foreign policy
Te principle o noninervenion in he domesic aairs o oher naions daes back ohe 1950s, when China’s revoluionary zeal and rm posiion in he communis bloclef i acing an increasingly hosile inernaional environmen. Foreign policy en-sions drained resources, wheher in he orm o wars or he limiaions on economicineracion wih is noncommunis neighbors. Chinese leaders responded wih a new sraegy ha would allow hem o economize hose resources and ocus on inernaldevelopmen. China began o build parners wihin he global nonaligned movemen by promoing noninervenion in he domesic aairs o oher naions—in sark conraso he Sovie Unions saed policy o inernaionalizing he socialis revoluion or America’s saed policy o promoing democraic movemens worldwide.Noninervenionism ook on new imporance under Deng Xiaoping beginning in helae 1970s because o Deng’s emphasis on a“low prole” oreign policy so ha Chinacould ocus exclusively on inernal economic developmen.
4
Chinese leaders elha an over-engaged oreign policy could hamper China’s economic needs by eiherresricing he counry rom key rading parners or by prioriizing miliary spend-ing over economic invesmen. Indeed, many emerging economic powers, includingIndia, Brazil, Souh Arica, and, up unil he Arab Spring, urkey,adoped noniner- venionis policies or similar reasons.
5
China’s noninervenion principle also serves he domesic poliical ineress o heChinese Communis Pary. Te Chinese governmen is an auhoriarian regime isel,and i is own ciizens rise up in regime-hreaening mass proess, hen i does no wanoreign governmens inervening in is domesic aairs and using sancions or oherinernaional policy levers o make i harder or Beijing o mainain inernal cohesionand conrol. Chinese leaders used he same noninervenion language o criicize heinernaional sancions ha ollowed he 1989 iananmen proess. Deng Xiaopingresponded o pos-iananmen sancionsby saing ha oreign governmens “were noqualied o punish China” or he iananmen crackdown, and ha Chinese leaders“would never permi oher counries o inerere in China’s inernal aairs.”
6
More recenly, Chinese leaders have used his same language when warning he UniedSaes no o inerere in ibe, Xinjiang, or aiwan. A Chinese Foreign Minisry spokes-man reerred o a U.S. law promoing inernaional religious reedom, seemingly ar-geed a Chinese crackdowns in ibe, as “ wanon inererence in China’s inernal aairs under he preex o religious reedom.
7
Similarly, Chinese Vice Foreign Miniser Zhang
 
3Center or American Progress | China and the Collapse o Its Noninterventionist Foreign Policy
Zhijun reerred o Presiden Barack Obama’sdecision o upgrade aiwanese F-16 gher jesas “a serious inervenion in he inernal aairs o China.
8
For he mos par his approach has enabled Chinese leaders o keep a low-proleoreign policy and o avoid he diplomaic dispues and resource-draining conics harequenly characerized Wesern and Sovie oreign policy during he Cold War. As a permanen member on he U.N. Securiy Council, China has generally opposedinervenions, bu ried o do so quiely by absaining insead o by veoing inernaionalacion. Te recen Syria voe was only he eighh ime since he People’s Republic o China joined he U.N. Securiy Council in 1971 ha China used is veo power, as com-pared o 123 imes or he Sovie Union/Russia and 82 imes or he Unied Saes.
China’s rising economic engagement abroad makes noninterferenceproblematic
Chinese economic developmen surged over he pas 30 years, leading is business com-muniies—sae-owned enerprises and privae companies alike—o expand more andmore ino he global economy as par o he Communis Pary’s “going ou” sraegy  , which encourages inernaional invesmen by Chinese companies.
9
Amid his chang-ing realiy, China atemped o mainain is radiional policy o diplomaic and miliary noninervenion—even as Chinese businesses engaged in greaer economic inerven-ion in he very same areas where he inernaional communiy seeks o poliically ormiliarily inervene. Tese economic ineress may orce China o rehink he wisdom o a noninervenion policy in he long erm as i becomes more dicul o mainain.Since he economically reorm-minded Deng Xiaoping assered conrol over heChinese leadership in he lae 1970s, China’s gross domesic produc—he larges mea-sure o all goods and services produced in China—has grownrom $148 billion in 1978
FIGURE 1
China’s U.N. Security Council vetoes
2012
Condemnation o Syrian human rights abuses
2011
Sanctions against Syria
2008
Sanctions against Zimbabwe
2007
Condemnation o Myanmar’s human rights abuses
1999
Extension o U.N. peacekeeping operation in Macedonia
1997
Establishment o U.N. peacekeeping operation in Guatemala
1972
Admission o Bangladesh to the United Nations
1972
Resolution on ceasefre or Yom Kippur War
Source: United Nations Bibliographic Information System
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more