Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
7Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Myrie Final Reply Brief Filed

Myrie Final Reply Brief Filed

Ratings: (0)|Views: 4,163 |Likes:
Published by David Oscar Markus
Mark Myrie's (Buju Banton) Reply Brief filed in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals by David Oscar Markus
Mark Myrie's (Buju Banton) Reply Brief filed in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals by David Oscar Markus

More info:

Published by: David Oscar Markus on Mar 10, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/30/2013

pdf

text

original

 
NO. 11-13077AA
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
 Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.MARK ANTHONY MYRIE,a/k/a Buju Banton
 Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee
On Appeal from the United States District Courtfor the Middle District of FloridaDistrict Court Case Number 8:09-CR-572REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT ANDRESPONSE BRIEF OF THE CROSS-APPELLEED
AVID
O
SCAR
M
ARKUS
M
ONA
E.
 
M
ARKUS
A.
 
M
ARGOT
M
OSS
M
ARKUS
&
 
M
ARKUS
,
PLLC
Attorneys for Appellant/Cross-Appellee40 N.W. 3 Street, Penthouse One
rd
Miami, Florida 33128Telephone No. (305) 379-6667Facsimile No. (305) 379-6668THIS CASE IS ENTITLED TO PREFERENCE (CRIMINAL APPEAL)
Case: 11-13077 Date Filed: 03/09/2012 Page: 1 of 63
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CITATIONS............................................iSTATEMENT OF THE ISSUEPRESENTED BY THE GOVERNMENTS CROSS-APPEAL.........1STATEMENT OF THE CASE........................................2SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT..................................11ARGUMENT.....................................................12I.THE GOVERNMENT HAS NOT REFUTED ITSFAILURE TO PROVE MYRIE GUILTY ON COUNTSONE AND FOUR.......................................12II.MYRIE WAS ENTRAPPED BY A NEFARIOUSGOVERNMENT AGENT................................19III.MYRIES SPEEDY TRIAL RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED......28IV.(CROSS-APPEAL) THE DISTRICT COURT PROPERLYENTERED A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL ONTHE § 924(C) GUN COUNT..............................33CONCLUSION...................................................54CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE...................................55CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.......................................55
Case: 11-13077 Date Filed: 03/09/2012 Page: 2 of 63
 
i
TABLE OF CITATIONSCASES:
 Bloate v. United States
130 S. Ct. 1345 (2010).....................................31, 32
 Burks v. United States
437 U.S. 1 (1978)............................................51
 Edwards v. United States
2011 WL 1357687 (M.D. Fla. April 11, 2011).....................24
 Jacobson v. United States
503 U.S. 540 (1992).................................24, 26, 27, 28
Pinkerton v. United States
328 U.S. 640 (1946)......................................
 passimScott v. Harris
550 U.S. 372 (2007)
...........................................
3
Stirone v. United States
361 U.S. 212 (1960)..........................................50
United States v. Alvarez
755 F.2d 830 (11th Cir. 1985)..................................40
United States v. Arbane
446 F.3d 1223 (11th Cir. 2006).................................14
United States v. Bailey
235 F.3d 1069 (8th Cir. 2000)..................................38
United States v. Bannister 
285 Fed. Appx. 621 (11th Cir. 2008).............................35
Case: 11-13077 Date Filed: 03/09/2012 Page: 3 of 63

Activity (7)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->