secretary of state, or the equivalent within a government hierarchy, which is the office that handles foreignrelations, these are the most senior agents of the State who are permitted to make agreements between thesovereign governments, such as treaties.For all governments, which is to say, pretty much all of them, a notary certificate is sufficient to allow adocument to be recognised in a foreign jurisdiction, but to further improve the protection against forgery, theApostille was invented as a means to get certification extended beyond the simple notary acknowledgementsuch that all signatories to the Apostille Convention will then accept such a document, originating from,usually, the 'private capacity' of the author of an instrument.To clarify, 'private capacity' means an act (authoring of a document) that does not involve a public entity, whichis usually just another way of saying a branch of government. Such instruments can include private contracts between people and declarations, which are usually referred to as 'Deeds' or 'Titles', which usually involve anindividual human or an entity staking a claim upon some piece of property or right.
The Extrinsic Fraud of Birth Certificates as Identification
An example of such a deed or title is the filing of the record of the birth of a child. Such instruments arecompleted and filed by a person in their private capacity. The reason for this is that, as an intangible, fictionalentity as the government cannot produce real (or moveable), physical property. Only a living flesh and bloodhuman being is capable of producing a child, for example. Thus the record of such an act by a living human being can only be made in their private capacity.These deeds, therefore, memorialise an event that is outside of the ownership of the State. In the specific case of birth registrations, therefore, the registry that accepts such filings of public records of events is thereforeholding such titles and deeds in trust, as the granting of this title can only be done in the private capacity of theauthor of such deeds, it cannot logically be said that such an instrument is the property of the State, but rather that the State is obliged to ensure that the record is kept for public inspection and protected from loss. Theseobligations are the essential components of what a trustee does in a trust agreement. The trustee does not gainthe right to personally profit from the property entrusted to them, for this would be a breach of trust.The fact of it being a trust arrangement, the filing of a record of birth, is not made explicit, for the reason of it being the basis of a package of information which is intended to then be used by the State in an act of extrinsicfraud. Extrinsic fraud means deception through omission of information vital to determining the proper courseof action by the victims of such fraud. Intrinsic fraud, to contrast, means to fabricate information. Since theinformation is produced by the party making such a record, it cannot be said that the State is engaging inintrinsic fraud, because the information is not produced by them.By not expressing this arrangement as an expressed trust agreement, they can then use the information to createa new instrument, in this case being a file record in the database of the registry accepting such lodgements of records to be acknowledged and recognised by the public. This transcription of the original filing then allows itto be implicit that anything issued out of this record is the property of the State. The form which this takes is theBirth Certificate.The fraud comes into this because this certificate is in fact issued from the transcript, and not authorised by theoriginal author of the original filing. It is often written upon the birth certificates issued by the registries of many governments stipulating that the birth certificate is not to be used as identification, while at the same timerequiring the presentation of this document in order to establish accounts for receiving the services of the State.By requiring the presentation of the Birth Certificate, or other instruments which require the presentation of theBirth Certificate in order to establish accounts, be they directly with the government or corporations under a public charter issued by the State, they acquire the tacit agreement that the person presenting such an instrumentas identification is acting as an agent of the State, and by this, bound then to the rules governing the activities of the State, also known as “Acts” or “Statutes” and deceptively referred to as Laws, which, unqualified, is afraudulent label, because they are only the laws of those in the employ or service of the State.This then permits the state to prosecute persons deemed to have breached these rules governing the activities of the State and its' agents, and is the fundamental basis of 'victimless crimes' such as possession of contrabanditems such as drugs or weapons, or the violation of transport department rules such as running a red light thatdoes not lead to any harm to any other person's property. These are marketed by the State as being in thePage 3 of 7