Page 3/8 March 11, 2012
Netsphere Inc et al v. Baron et al
(3:09-cv-00988) in the US District Court, Northern District of Texas: False docket notes with nodocket numbers and/or with no hyperlinks to records.
Netsphere Inc, et al v Jeffrey Baron
(10-1120) in the US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit: Thecorruption in the US District Court is permitted to continue unbridled, to this date. [
Numerous filings with the US Court of Appeals, 5
Circuit, did not put an end to the alleged racketeering inthe US District Court in Texas.Appeal from the Ex Parte Order Appointing Receiver was filed on December 3, 2010, and continues to thisdate. The docket of the US Court of Appeals notes numerous other related filings.
The US Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction over simulated orders and judgments of the US District Court.Therefore, all such cases in the US Court of Appeals, are opined as fraud on the court as well.Regarding District Judge ROYAL FURGESON, who pretends to appear as Presiding Judge inthe case,papers filed in the US Court of Appeals by the Defendant quote the from official transcripts:
THE COURT: You realize that order is an order of the Court. So any failure to comply with that order iscontempt, punishable by lots of dollars, punishable by possible jail, death.
THE COURT: They do and I have jurisdiction, too. So I'll tell you what.... You want to challenge the court order, Ihave the marshals behind me. I can come to your house, pick you up, put you in jail. I can seize your property,do anything I need to do to enforce my orders. I'm telling you don't screw with me. You are a fool, a fool, a fool,a fool to screw with a federal judge, and if you don't understand that, I can make you understand it. I have theforce of the Navy, Army, Marines and Navy behind me.
Regarding Attorney PETER VOGEL, who pretends to appear as Receiver both in the District Court and in theCourt of Appeals, papers filed in the US Court of Appeals by the Defendant note:
“Attorney Peter Vogel is a colleague of the district judge and the two blog together on Karl Bayer’s blog site.”
“Peter Vogel, at this minute, is marching forward, billing daily in a billing frenzy, at a rate of almost $10,000.00per day.”
“Peter Vogel and his law firm were adverse to Jeff Baron– literally specialists in suing him (and Ondova). Theyapparently developed this specialty in violation of their ethical duties – after acquiring attorney-client confidentialmaterial Jeff Baron disclosed to Peter Vogel in 2001.”
Regardless, the US Court of Appeals continues to patronize the conduct of the US District Court in this case:
On December 8, 2010, Circuit Judges PATRICK HIGGINBOTHAM, JERRY E SMITH, andCATHARINA HAYNES, denied Baron’s initial Motion for Stay pending Appeal, in an unsigned order,which bears no stamp of the Clerk of the Court.