Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Radiation Protection in Conflict With Science by Franz Adlkofer and Karl Richter

Radiation Protection in Conflict With Science by Franz Adlkofer and Karl Richter

Ratings: (0)|Views: 21 |Likes:
Published by EMFsafety
Radiation Protection in Conflict with Science (2011)
A Documentation by Franz Adlkofer and Karl Richter

Effects of Wireless Communication Technologies: A Brochure Series by the Competence Initiative for the Protection of Humanity, Environment and Democracy. Brochure 5
Radiation Protection in Conflict with Science (2011)
A Documentation by Franz Adlkofer and Karl Richter

Effects of Wireless Communication Technologies: A Brochure Series by the Competence Initiative for the Protection of Humanity, Environment and Democracy. Brochure 5

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Science
Published by: EMFsafety on Mar 11, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/11/2012

 
For some EMF-related bibliographies see:http://www.scribd.com/my_document_collections/3440803
 
Radiation Protection in Conflict with Science (2011)
A Documentation by Franz Adlkofer and Karl Richter Effects of Wireless Communication Technologies: A Brochure Series by the CompetenceInitiative for the Protection of Humanity, Environment and Democracy. Brochure 564 pages: Free Downloadhttp://www.kompetenzinitiative.net/broschuerenreihe/brochure-series/english/radiation-protection-in-conflict-with-science.html
Contents
Foreword
5
Part I
:
A Campaign to destroy scientific findings
Franz Adlkofer and Karl Richter 1. REFLEX results are in the way of a policy that sends out all-clear signals 72. Studies on genotoxic effects of mobile phone radiation from the Clinical Division of OccupationalMedicine are suspected of fraud 83. A Council for Scientific Ethics is misused to destroy scientific data 94. The MUV rector informs the public about fraud at his university 115. The replacement of the chair of the Council for Scientific Ethics changes the initial situation 126. After July 24, 2008, further fraud claims are false testimony 147. Prof. Lerchl continues his campaign in spite of the findings by the Council for Scientific Ethics8. The newsmagazine
 Der Spiegel 
 provides Prof. Lerchl’s campaign with the desired broad public exposure179. A booklet about
 Fraudsters in the lab and their helpers
unmasks its author as an unbridled slanderer 1910. A workshop of the German Research Association for Radio Applications hopes to be able to finallyeliminate the MUV research results 2111. Using a defamation-friendly forum on mobile communication radiation finally turns the campaignagainst the REFLEX results into mudslinging 2312. Despite of the verdict not guilty of data fraud the Vienna research results and the reputation of theresponsible scientists remain damaged 26
Part II: Scientific flaws in the German Telecommunication ResearchProgramm

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->